[Mr_Mary_Jo_Kopechne]

Please add to the list I came up with, or tell me why you think I am off on any of the points above.

This is my first post, please forgive or move if it qualifies as vanity.

[onyx eyes]

Darlin' you are perfectly fine.

[narby]

You mean the "Bush Was Selected Lady"??? (BWS Lady)

[MindBender26]

Who paid for her trip to NYC?

Follow the money; follow the crime.

[hole_n_one]

Nicely done!

[VisualizeSmallerGovernment]

Rather asks if she feels this way because there were other politically connected people in the Guard at the time, and Knox answers yes.

Name 5.

[Howlin]

This is a great list!

Add:

but hearsay of pilots that served with Bush delivered by a secretary with a known partisan bias is credible?)

UNNAMED PILOTS!!

[VisualizeSmallerGovernment]

"Knox tells us that we accurately reported the falsified documents".

Rather is going to be a laughing stock for generations if he sticks with this line.

[narby]

7) Knox mentions twice that other pilots who knew Bush was not fulfilling his obligation Knox - "his time there, it seemed the other fellows were, I am going to say this, sort of resentful for his attitude." Rather - "and what was his attitude" Knox - "well, that he really didn't have to go by the rules" Rather - "he didn't really have to go by the rules?" Knox - "it seemed that way to me"

Some effort needs to be done to contact squadron mates of Bush and counter this (C)BS.

[bitt]

kudos.

[Iam1ru1-2]

"(As an aside, the left apparently thinks that 250+ swift vets who served with Kerry but not on Kerry's boat are not credible, but hearsay of pilots that served with Bush delivered by a secretary with a known partisan bias is credible?)"

T O U C H E ! !

[timestax]

RATHER

UNCOMFORTABLE

[greatgranny]

I listened to that "report". It seemed to me that rather was leading her on for the answers. I think that rather as well as the woman are a bunch of !@#$%^&*. I won't say what I really want to because I try not to swear. But I am really getting steamed over this. I also don't want to get banned.

[DJtex]

I didn't want to actually watch that crap, but I knew that some brave souls here would for me. Do you think that this woman who they flew up to NYC, who said that the memos are fake, do you think that 60 Minutes now will start backing away from these forgeries or did Dan Rather even talk about that?

[blake6900]

Knox said she didn't type these memos but Rather never asked her if she had typed any memos similar to these regarding Bush. She did say she would have typed them differently but the main question, "did you ever type memos like these about George W. Bush?" was never asked or answered.

[1L]

Like most left wing journalists, Rather started with a conclusion and worked his way backward.

[arasina]

Very well done, sir. Thought provoking.

[Niks]

There's no "who", "what", "when" and "where" in her statements. Sounds like just her "feelings". That's not evidence. It's Rather pathetic, don't you think?

[harpo11]

Can it be that CBS's m.o. and overall strategy has been to destroy republican presidents. I'm wondering how much they cooked up fraudulent information going all the way back to Nixon?

CBS should be heavily fined and cancelled for their pernicious and egregious actions. I despise CBS News and their advertisers.

And, furthermore, CBS will no longer be a station my family will view for anything they wish to broadcast. They are banned from my television viewing until they exterminate the vermin that resides within their bowels and flush it out.

[bayourod]

That interview was obviously extensively edited, like almost every sentence was jerky. They must not have had time to get Michael Moore's editor.

Wouldn't be surprised to see her repudiate the interview soon.

[Nosterrex]

I would add that in an earlier article, Mrs. Knox said that she hardly knew Lt. Bush. It's amazing how quickly she remembered all these details. I wish I could find that link to the interview she gave to a Texas paper. Maybe someone here can recall it?