Lando 
Posted on 09/14/2004 9:46:33 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln
Lando
Dear Leftists/MSM:
What if there IS NO dirt? What if there's just NO DIRT?
Kerry has positioned himself such that he can ONLY throw dirt. His party is more divided than the country. Any position he takes is going to upset at least half of his party, so throwing dirt is all this scumbag has left.
Well, since there is no dirt, they're making things up. For example: forged documents and kitty's new book.
How about changing that to a picture of Kerry`s head coming out?
Well, the clarity is unusual here, but bingo, its dead on.
They're desperate because of the swiftvets. Those ads are like a corrosive acid, eating away at the framework of the Kerry campaign.
It almost seems Bill and Hillary are the best friends Republicans ever had. They handed us the Congress, then the Presidency, soon the Supreme Court and even stronger control of the Congress. Are they that inept or are they plants?
You'd think they would concentrate on things like the median family income getting smaller, or the huge increases in health insurance costs, or the almost 18pct increase in senior medicare premiums, or Osama still at-large, or privatization of social security, or overstating the 2004 deficit, or no end-plan for Iraq, or 'permanent' tax cuts, or the price of prescription medicine, or why people still worry about their jobs, or the price of fuel, or the environment, or stuff like that.
What the Democrats fail to realize is that the Republicans now have a blueprint for beating the Democrats. Fight them back, tooth and nail, make them answer questions.
This strategy has worked for Reagan against the Soviets and it has worked for Bush vs Hussein. The way good wins out over evil is to address it directly.
A Bush win in November will spell disaster for the Democrat party. Picture Democrat congressmen and senators being denied funding for pet projects. Watch the looks on their faces as the feed trough says Republicans only. Picture money going to the RNC so that each state will put up a candidate in 06 running on the premise of, "your congressman cannot bring home the bacon. I will."
Oh how sweet. Watch how we reduce spending on the backs of the Blue states. Not break them mind you. Just enough to let them know that perhaps they backed the wrong horse in 04. Bush will remind Senators like Levin, Leahy and Kennedy that their lies will come back to haunt them.
Imagine the looks on the Mullahs faces in Iran as elections are held early in 05 and the US military will pull out through Tehran and Damascus. Can't wait to see Germany and Frances faces as the oil for food scandal picks up full steam.
This is not a good time to be a Democrat. Especially one who knows that his party was hijacked from him.
Squash or cabbage come to mind.
Are you a troll?
That got Ralph going saying he was providing people with an option to vote for someone not controlled by special interest money. He then blasted both Dem's and Repub's. Next he described a number of issues like those you pointed out and indicated that these are things that should be discussed in the election campaign.
While I am a Republican and want GW to win, I do have to admit that Nader had some good things to say. I too think we should find out where Kerry stands on military budgets, the war on terrorism, the size of the federal government as opposed to font sizes, national guard services of GW, and the latest rants of Kitty Kelley.
GW has a vision for this country and Kerry is trying to keep from explaining what he will do (as he hasn't yet been told what to do by his handlers.)
Nope, but I do some volunteer advocacy work for a little guy with horns and a pointy tail.
And if Kerry steps down in disgrace, the DNC will appoint...
The issue for Democrats is no longer a Kerry win, but rather to insure that Bush has no coat tails. The best that the Dems can hope for is that Democrat voters turn to Nader rather than stay home. I noticed on some of the polls this seems to be happening. When Nader is added to the mix, Bush goes down a few points rather than Kerry.
I have nothing against the president, as I think he is a good man, I don't even think about Mr. Kerry or Mr. Nader. But I have a very bad gut-feeling/fear for our personal freedoms and what we consider as the American way of life, of many that surround and advise the president. I don't like what is going on in the Middle-east, or domestically. Therefore, I have chosen to abstain from voting this year, as I do not want to have an active part in getting either candidate elected.
Ok, Michael Moore and Kitty Kelley haven't done the trick. The way things are going, Larry Flynt will be showing up any day now.
Moore, Kelley, and Flynt -- the heavy hitters of today's Democratic Party. Don't know if Rather raises or lowers the average.
I feel blessed not to be a Democrat.
This may seem silly, but there will be a backlash against all discussion of military record, not just the forged ones. The public isn't very smart, and they will see the upcoming Swiftboat ads as equivalent to the CBS debacle.
Fortunately Bush has a nice lead and Kerry has nothing positive to offer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.