Skip to comments.
Killian Signed a Doc with a Different Typeface and Other Diffs One Year Later (FR EXCLUSIVE)
Bush ANG Doc Dump Feb. 2004 ^
| February 14, 2004
| Bush ANG Doc Dump Feb. 2004
Posted on 09/09/2004 7:04:34 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
This is one more brick in the wall supporting the case that the CBS docs are forgeries (every little bit helps).
NEED TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE!:
Could a FReeper please post the JPEG into this thread so all can see (and I don't burn up all of my allowed bandwidth)?
Thanks in advance.
To: litany_of_lies
To: litany_of_lies
3
posted on
09/09/2004 7:08:24 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: litany_of_lies
4
posted on
09/09/2004 7:08:26 PM PDT
by
dalebert
To: mabelkitty
6
posted on
09/09/2004 7:08:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
(What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
To: Josh in PA
Thanks for jumping on it so quickly.
To: litany_of_lies
I too have been to a site where GWB ANG records are posted -the signature and block for Killian do not match the CBS Hoax - I can e-mail them to someone as a word attachment for posting
8
posted on
09/09/2004 7:09:45 PM PDT
by
VRWCTexan
(History has a long memory - but still repeats itself)
To: Josh in PA
You just guaranteed his bandwidth will be strangled.
9
posted on
09/09/2004 7:09:53 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: litany_of_lies
How do you figure the secretary's initials were redacted? Also, is this memo in proportional type like the fake CBS memo's?
10
posted on
09/09/2004 7:10:33 PM PDT
by
Rokke
To: johnwayne
No super script in the 111th.
11
posted on
09/09/2004 7:10:43 PM PDT
by
stockpirate
(Dick Morris; Before he spoke, supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor)
To: Izzy Dunne
DOH!! I'm a buffoon.
Somebody with power, delete my message..
CRIPES! :(.. sorry.
To: johnwayne
Texes? I'm I seeing this correctly?
To: litany_of_lies
Also... compare the redacted info in this document, compared to the May 4th, 1972 redaction... you can actually read the redacted information in the May 4th, 1972 document as I have illustrated here after increasing the brightness... http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/BushGuardmay4.pdf
14
posted on
09/09/2004 7:12:55 PM PDT
by
oolatec
To: litany_of_lies
One more nail in the coffin containing Dan Rather's reputation.
RIP, MF.
15
posted on
09/09/2004 7:12:56 PM PDT
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: litany_of_lies
This looks more like a real doc to me.
16
posted on
09/09/2004 7:12:57 PM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(Only dummies play poker with George W. Bush.)
To: Rokke
This memo (now visible) is in an "equal-space" font (older-tech). It's NOT proportional, which is what my point #1 refers to.
To: flevit
We're getting closer - check out this thread ...
18
posted on
09/09/2004 7:13:21 PM PDT
by
11th_VA
(While Kerry lied, good men died ...)
To: litany_of_lies
The date really stands out:
6 Sep 73 on the authentic memos
vs
18 August 1973 on the CBS memos
To: Rokke
The memo from Bush is NOT in proportional font. Pick any two words - one above the other - on the page. Note that each letter and space line up exactly with the letter and space above/below it.
"I respectfully" and "and reassignment" from lines 1 and 2 line up precisely - no proportionality.
20
posted on
09/09/2004 7:14:21 PM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
