Skip to comments.
Bringing it on
Augusta Free Press ^
| 9/06/04
| K.L. Marsala
Posted on 09/06/2004 6:38:58 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: kattracks
GOT SENATE RECORD? BRING IT ON!
21
posted on
09/06/2004 7:51:02 AM PDT
by
TigersEye
(Let's hear about your Senate record already, John!)
To: Made in USA
What shark?
Just kidding
22
posted on
09/06/2004 8:00:56 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
To: kattracks
"Bring it ON -
And Don't Question MY Patriotism!
"Don't Question MY Authority!"
hmmm, Kerry & Cartman related???
23
posted on
09/06/2004 8:12:17 AM PDT
by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
To: sarasotarepublican
Exactly. Preaching to the choir. How does this now-popular and organized group (FR) peacefully assemble its position and it many common believers to actually promote change?
We here all seem aware of the problems, but no one person has the individual ability to promote change or even accountability from leaders from either party (i.e. - our border control).
How does a new "party" emerge in a two party system, without radically changing one of the two existing parties? And how do we organize to gently demand that an existing party make such radical changes?
The answer is not through education, nor through our elected leaders, and the answer is not the MSM. The answer is not violence, and it is not demonstration. It seems that the answer must be open, honest and public discourse at all levels, including national debate provided through and reinforced with internet communication.
Instead of a staged socialist-run debate (the upcoming presidential candidate debates), we need something broadcast effectively, with a disciplined conversation/arguments from both sides. For instance, take a strong spokesperson from each party, have them debate without screaming, insulting, etc., and actually attempt to rationally discuss the issues. Imagine issuing a simple challenge to debate on-line three or four significant issues by internet - Coulter vs. McCualife, for instance.
At that point, I believe the BS would have to stop, much in the same manner as the A/P story about Bush speaking about Clinton's health was corrected when the reporter's credibility was challneged for stating "boos" existed when they did not.....
As you seem to suggest, if rational discourse (i.e. the truth) is no longer defined as provable and objective reasoning, it seems rather necessary and therefore pointless to discuss this only among ourselves....
24
posted on
09/06/2004 8:14:09 AM PDT
by
bobono
To: kattracks
25
posted on
09/06/2004 12:04:16 PM PDT
by
GailA
( hanoi john, I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, before I impose a moratorium on it.)
To: kattracks
26
posted on
09/06/2004 11:46:14 PM PDT
by
Christian4Bush
(I approve this message: "One committed "war crimes"; the other, "Moore crimes." Both are wrong.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson