Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Set Republican History Free From Liberal Lies!
www.authentichistory.com ^ | August 26, 2004 | Brandon Beaver

Posted on 08/26/2004 1:55:03 PM PDT by Bush4304

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Bush4304

the left controls the schools, the media and the books no wonder the truth gets buried.


21 posted on 08/26/2004 3:20:40 PM PDT by Nat Turner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

Your missing the point, im not "refighting the civil war" at all. Im confronting popular lies that the Democrats throw out to get votes.


22 posted on 08/26/2004 6:25:51 PM PDT by Bush4304
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bush4304
Your missing the point, im not "refighting the civil war" at all. Im confronting popular lies that the Democrats throw out to get votes.

Pump ya brakes, man. I replied to Redbob, not you.


$710.96... The price of freedom
VII-XXIII-MMIV

23 posted on 08/26/2004 6:33:03 PM PDT by rdb3 ("The Republican Party is the ship and all else is the sea." ---Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Thats equally as wrong as ANYBODY who was against the civil rights laws. I was pointing out how stupid it is for the NAACP to compare Republicans to the Taliban, and to call us racist.


24 posted on 08/26/2004 6:34:33 PM PDT by Bush4304
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Bush4304
Thats equally as wrong as ANYBODY who was against the civil rights laws.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Barry was against the civil rights legislation because at that time, it was a nearly unprecedented expansion of the Federal government regulation of 'interstate commerce": effectively making anything and everything interstate commerce, and he oppsed it because the legislation was in his view, properly a matter for the States to decide, not Washington.

What is the 'that' in your post 'Thats equally as wrong ...'? Opposition to the civil rights legislation? Barry's reasons? Using Barry's opposition as a response to claims that Republicans were the party of civil rights?
25 posted on 08/26/2004 6:44:12 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko (Oh, and Dick Cheney, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Barry was against the civil rights legislation because at that time, it was a nearly unprecedented expansion of the Federal government regulation of 'interstate commerce": effectively making anything and everything interstate commerce, and he oppsed it because the legislation was in his view, properly a matter for the States to decide, not Washington.

And we know that the States had a wonderful record in that regard, right?


$710.96... The price of freedom
VII-XXIII-MMIV

26 posted on 08/26/2004 8:26:44 PM PDT by rdb3 ("The Republican Party is the ship and all else is the sea." ---Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
And we know that the States had a wonderful record in that regard, right?

I've gotta take this as sarcastic, even if you didn't 'close the html'.

Unfortunately, arguing 'States' rights' as a reason for opposing Federal government expansion opens up the argument that 'you'd be in favor of Jim Crow laws'. That's one reason I included Barry's argument that the civil rights laws were unconstitutional as regulating intrastate commerce.
27 posted on 08/26/2004 8:35:43 PM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
That's one reason I included Barry's argument that the civil rights laws were unconstitutional as regulating intrastate commerce.

But it was constitutional to use States rights to make sure that boots were always kept on my fathers necks.


$710.96... The price of freedom
VII-XXIII-MMIV

28 posted on 08/26/2004 8:44:00 PM PDT by rdb3 ("The Republican Party is the ship and all else is the sea." ---Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tsali

Were do you get your history from? The DNC!

Grant was from the north. Lived in IL.& WI. His wife was from the south and grew up in a slave owning family.
One of the things she couldn’t get over when she first came with him to live up north.
Was how it took less Blacks to do work up here.


29 posted on 08/27/2004 12:05:31 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tsali

Ulysses S. Grant
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/grant/


30 posted on 08/27/2004 12:07:38 AM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

No, I was saying that it was wrong for anybody to be against the civil rights legislation.

The whole point of this post however, is that I am EXTREMLEY SICK of the NAACP calling the republican party racest, and making those extreme gerneralizations when they are not true. The fact of the matter is, that most blacks vote democrat primarley because they have heard these lies.


31 posted on 08/30/2004 2:27:42 PM PDT by Bush4304
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson