Posted on 08/01/2004 2:34:26 PM PDT by kattracks
Or was something important left out of what Kerry said?
The liar is really stretching this one!!!
Name those states Dickhead, that ban eating the fish you catch.
A person who fishes pays attention to advisories that one ought not to eat fish from a polluted source.
"not allowed...????
Keep on rocking Johnny. You are killing me!
Thank you very much!
Phony Faith + Sleeve = JFnK
YOU VOTED TO BAN THE .30-30 AMMUNITION!!!!!! The NRA says Kerry usually votes against gun rights in the Senate. Kerry supports extending the ban on assault-type weapons and requiring background checks at gun shows. He opposes granting gun makers immunity from civil lawsuits.
He also voted to BAN .30-30 AMMO!
Hey dj, pacifists as the yoyo's that stand on the corner and observe genocide for some higher principle which has never, and will never, be made clear to me. His statement is right on the money.
Senator...the Second Amendment has NOTHING...NADA...ZIPPO... to do with hunting...It has to do with deposing an abusive government if the need arises.He could've fooled me!!! :)
Yes, his "faith" has served him well whenever he feels the need to fool somebody that he is a believing catholic. Funny, but I have thought that WE are supposed to serve our God and faith, NOT that IT was supposed to serve us. Oh well, I must have that wrong because Kerry would never be wrong on matters of faith. /sarcasm
**********************
the above has to be one of the most stupid comments ive ever seen.. this makes me doubt seriously whether you actually finished high school on a certain level.. comparing pacifists to three dictative regimes which have done horrendous things makes me doubt whether you have a total lack of logical reasoning or maybe you've been part of a psychologic experiment? your vote is wasted for the concerns of normal people..
He wasn't directly comparing pacifists with Stalinists, Maoists and Ba'athists; it was simply a comment that they're often "on the same side". History provides examples of this, time and again.
Now, do you have a substantive argument with which to refute xm177e2's comments? All I see so far is a personal attack. Poor form, especially on your first day.
One thing I'm sure of, is that you signed on today. I wonder why.
Say...isn't that the cartridge that your buddy, Teddy the Swimmer, wants to ban?
Typical lamestream reporting. First, his votes have been 100.000 % anti-gun, every time; he has never voted for gun rights. There is no "usually" about it. He hasn't made many votes this last year, but he took time from his busy campaign schedule to vote against gun shows and against cosmetically different firearms. Second, typical lamestream writing is evident with the "NRA says" throwaway line, apparently designed to color the following assertion. Kerry's antigun voting record is clear, but the reporter can't bring herself to simply say so outright.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.