Posted on 07/30/2004 2:49:23 PM PDT by swilhelm73
We can dredge up and analyze the history of the Viet Nam war until hell freezes over to determine what some young kids did or did not do in the 60's and 70's. Those answers will not tell us, however, which of these two are more qualified to lead the US for the next four years. GW Bush, while considered by many as the 'dim bulb in the pack', has reversed a recession that was handed to him, fought a war on terrorism that has not resulted in a repeat of 9/11, and seems to be a lot more believable than his opponent. John Kerry, on the other hand, seems to be a pathological liar who would appease any audience with his fibs and flip-flops................
I know a lot of guys who joined the NG and I don't think anyone had to pull any strings though they and their parents may have had more understanding about their chances of going to Vietnam than the regular Joe.
I heard tonight that President Bush's service records show he signed he did not want to go oversea's. Anyone else hear he had checked that box when he signed up?
I'm needing to find out how we can disprove this claim by the Dems. This is their newest assertion.
I just heard it tonight on Hannity and Colmes (I think it was Hannity and Colmes). 7/30/04
Anyone else hear this?
See my question in post 24. Thanks
BTTT!!!!!!!
Um, don't think that box ever existed. Those who joined the NG take them same oath as everyone else.
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.