Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jonah Goldberg: Berger's Revealing Footnotes
Town Hall ^ | July 23, 2004 | Jonah Goldberg [Tribune Media Services]

Posted on 07/23/2004 7:49:37 PM PDT by quidnunc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2004 7:49:38 PM PDT by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

And to think the Bush-whackers on the left have the nerve to call President Bush's administration incompetent.


2 posted on 07/23/2004 7:55:08 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Ah, Jonah's giving me an idea for a new name for this: Smugglegate.


3 posted on 07/23/2004 7:55:18 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

bump


4 posted on 07/23/2004 7:55:36 PM PDT by js1138 (In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

I think you're onto something!


5 posted on 07/23/2004 8:00:01 PM PDT by NordP (The terrorists aren’t bullies on a playground; they’re hard core, “24” TV, head-sawing TERRORISTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

"The innocent explanation is the most likely one"

This is one of my favorite Clinton quotes ever. It's right up there with the meaning of "is".


6 posted on 07/23/2004 8:00:20 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
What would make anyone risk so much?

"Sandy, if you f&ck this up, she'll register us both into Fort Marcy Park."


7 posted on 07/23/2004 8:01:39 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Then I say unto you, send men to summon ... worms. And let us go to Fallujah to collect heads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
The rest of the article:

In an interview with the Denver Post, Clinton stuck to the most "innocent explanation," that Berger's just a slob. "We were all laughing about it on the way over here," he told the paper. "People who don't know him might find it hard to believe. But ... all of us who've been in his office have always found him buried beneath papers."

Now, I've chatted with a few people who are very experienced in the rules and procedures governing the handling of classified documents. And many of them think this "innocent" explanation is the most damning. Berger was the head of the NSA, and he was in charge of countless documents like these when he was in the White House. And here Clinton is defending him by saying mistakes like these are just plain funny because they're so typical. Berger steals documents in the lead-up the 9/11 Commission hearings because - according to his lawyer! - he was too distracted stealing notes that he couldn't keep things straight. And Bill Clinton is laughing it off. Why? Because that's so like Sandy! He was always a slob with vital national security documents.

Mr. Berger has been a top advisor to the Kerry campaign. He resigned this week to stem the damage to the Democrats. But why didn't Berger tell Kerry he was being investigated? I guess being investigated by the Justice Department for his chicanery is as laughable - and therefore trivial - a subject as losing "password" class documents and sneaking past armed guards with notes crammed into your pants.

Now, nobody ever gives this administration the benefit of the "most innocent" explanation. George W. Bush is still called a liar every day, and the Kerry campaign still says Bush misled the country, even though two massive investigations - one in Britain and one by the Senate Intelligence Committee - have exonerated Bush of that charge and cast very harsh light on his accusers, like former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.

This election - according to every observer and even the campaigns themselves - will be focused on national security and the war on terror. But the Democrats and The New York Times are convinced the real scandal here isn't Berger's antics but the leak which revealed them. I cannot recall such concern about a single leak in the last year which hurt the Bush administration.

The central debate of this election is national security. Democrats charge that Bush has fumbled it. Republicans charge that the Democrats don't take it seriously enough. Fair debate.

But now comes a senior adviser to the Kerry campaign, who helped write the Democratic platform and who set anti-terror policy in the last administration. He's been caught in a scandal in which the most innocent defense they can mount is that he was so careless, so sloppy and so dismissive of the rules that he stole - and lost! - extremely sensitive documents by accident, while illegally smuggling others. And the last Democratic Commander-in-Chief says it's not only typical, it's funny.

That may be the most innocent explanation, but it's also evidence why these guys have their work cut out if they're going to convince voters they're serious about national security.

8 posted on 07/23/2004 8:01:54 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

This cannot DIE !!!!!!!!1111111


9 posted on 07/23/2004 8:02:51 PM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

defense against criminality is an offensive to prove how sloppy
***
Rush Limbaugh should do a "hang on Sloppy" parody song, it's a natural.


10 posted on 07/23/2004 8:07:14 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
It's like a 10-year-old telling his parents he knowingly stole $5 worth of candy but in the process he accidentally shoplifted a basketball. And this guy was the National Security Adviser.

I finally realized who Berger reminds me of. Remember Michael J. Pollard, the character actor from the '60s & 70's who usually played some slow-witted retard (i.e. the idiot kid in Bonnie and Clyde)?

Berger looks like Pollard and behaves like his characters.

11 posted on 07/23/2004 8:08:49 PM PDT by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis

or maybe "hangin' sloppy ( by the neck )"


12 posted on 07/23/2004 8:09:05 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Why was Berger allowed to leave the Archives with those documents in the first place? If this is typical treatment of classified information in Washington, then we might as well declassify everything!

I have not so fond memories of platoon leaders and squad leaders being drummed out of the Army because they lost their "Confidential" communication codes during field exercises in Germany.

Classified documents were handled with great care at every unit I was assigned to. Why can't high-ranking civilians do the same?

13 posted on 07/23/2004 8:16:05 PM PDT by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
Classified documents were handled with great care at every unit I was assigned to. Why can't high-ranking civilians do the same?

Because he wasn't sloppy, he was trying to get rid of the evidence of his own incompetence as head of the NSA.

14 posted on 07/23/2004 8:26:01 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

What is it with the krinton klan?

They spend a great deal of government time either putting things into their pants or pulling things out...


15 posted on 07/23/2004 8:27:44 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund CPB, NPR and PBS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim_Curtis
It's right up there with the meaning of "is".

When I sat in front of my TV and saw the President of the United States, William Jefferson Clinton, look me straight in the eye and say, "It depends on what the meaning of the word IS, is," and the American public didn't scream for his impeachment post haste, I forever lost my faith in the American public.

16 posted on 07/23/2004 8:35:58 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Our Founders' bedrock vision: INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, not the false equality of the statist collective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

This whole Berger thing smells like something from the Clinton era - do something illegal then laugh it off when you get caught. Liberals love that approach to politics, but if Berger were a Conservative the liberals would be pounding the GOP.

This story definitely has legs, but not in the liberal media.

I'm surprised that these sensitive documents weren't photocopied before being looked at by Berger. It shows a weakness in security protocol.


17 posted on 07/23/2004 9:09:26 PM PDT by Noachian (Judicial legislation without the consent of the people is tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Here's the straight dope. These documents were regarding Islamist terrorism. Berger wanted to cover up notes that were made on early drafts (possibly by Berger himself) of these Islamist terrorism documents. He did this because those notes talk about Islamist terrorism in the American heartland in 1995, which begs the question of why X42 didn't act decisively against Islamism back then.

Bush doesn't want to touch this for various reasons-- he possibly didn't want to deal with it (possibly prefering to go against Iraq before going against Afghanistan or just didn't want to take the nation to war) or he respected the office of the presidency too much to throw X42 before the wolves (making us look like a Banana Republic) or some other reason. This Berger leak came from the Kerry camp.

Al-Qaeda’s OKC-9/11 Ties

18 posted on 07/23/2004 9:15:28 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy

No, Berger wouldn't risk this for his own legacy. He did this for someone else's legacy. He was trying to hide something bigger.


19 posted on 07/23/2004 9:21:42 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
"It's like a 10-year-old telling his parents he knowingly stole $5 worth of candy but in the process he accidentally shoplifted a basketball. And this guy was the National Security Adviser. "

Fully in compliance with the minimum standards for the Clinton administration.

20 posted on 07/23/2004 9:35:14 PM PDT by cookcounty (LBJ sent him to VN. Nixon expressed him home. And JfK's too dumb to tell them apart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson