New Reports Again Question Whether Iraq Sought Uranium in Niger (Dubya maybe didn't lie)

The New York Times ^ | July 18, 2004 | Richard W. Stevenson and David Johnson

[zarf]

Was this in the toilet paper section or did it get into the classifieds?

[Intolerant in NJ]

Were those infamous 16 words correct after all? ...they've always been correct - Britain did have reports that Iraq was seeking uranium in Niger, and has reconfirmed the reports since then - strange how a supposedly great paper like the NYT can be so weak on facts and logic........

[neverdem]

It's in the International section.

Here's the link. If they demand registration, and you decline, then you can try BugMeNot.com

Here's the URL:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/18/international/middleeast/18URAN.html

Just enter that URL into BugMeNot.com

[rebel_yell2]

When I see an article like this, I go to the NYSlimes and email it to all of my liberal friends. If enough of us did this, it would push the article into the Slimes "Top 25 Most Emailed Articles" where it would confront everyone who emails an article.

[Pharmboy]

The print edition headline for the story was slightly different:

New Reports Reopen Debate Over Whether Iraq Sought Uranium in Niger

I think this one is a bit better for the truth's side.