Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jesus and Muhammad: A Core Difference Between Islam and Christianity's Central Figures
Amazing Universe ^ | July 13, 2004 | Steven

Posted on 07/16/2004 11:24:28 AM PDT by StevenAU

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: StevenAU

i feel so cheated, people keep telling me islam is the religion of peace. i hate when im lied to.


21 posted on 07/16/2004 12:36:49 PM PDT by wing84th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
"Flat wrong. First, it was Jesus who suggested disciples take swords with them on their travels"

: "TO make this statement you're taking one verse out of context. It demonstrates someone with no real knowledge of the bible as a whole, rather someone who has read bits and pieces or listened to someone else on a website somewhere."

The meaning of the verse is clear. How exactly would "context" change it? I have just re-read the verse and the verses before and after it. I see no ambiguity.

22 posted on 07/16/2004 12:51:54 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
"Flat wrong. First, it was Jesus who suggested disciples take swords with them on their travels"

: "TO make this statement you're taking one verse out of context. It demonstrates someone with no real knowledge of the bible as a whole, rather someone who has read bits and pieces or listened to someone else on a website somewhere."

The meaning of the verse is clear. How exactly would "context" change it? I have just re-read the verse and the verses before and after it. I see no ambiguity.

How does one tell, for sure, just who has "real" knowledge of the Bible, anyway. Just you, maybe?

23 posted on 07/16/2004 12:52:55 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

A little misleading. Firstly, I wouldn't exactly call Jesus a pacifist. Anyone who could, singlehandedly, drive out the moneychangers from the temple was no pacifist. Secondly, his advice and teachings were geared toward the individual, not groups. Thirdly, I wouldn't exactly call adultery a minor sin.


24 posted on 07/16/2004 12:55:16 PM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

the whole flipping the tables deal was an example of where
we get the term "righteous indignation". If someone is in
your church(or in this case, temple) and defiles it...there
you go. I don't see Marines/Soldiers shooting at non-combatants while hiding in a church. That said, any religion
can be "hijacked" to do evil, some are just way more
susceptible to it than others.In this case Islam.If you can't read and have everything spoon fed to you in a madrass
from age 0...you get Ronald McWahabbi.


25 posted on 07/16/2004 1:00:08 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
People who would make your argument are the exact same kind of people who read Matthew 6:6 and then say that Jesus commanded us to not pray in public.

Again, you are welcome to educate me.

26 posted on 07/16/2004 1:02:04 PM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kezekiel

Finally, someone who understands. Some are called to peace, some are called to war. He equips us for the mission we are to fulfill. It is written that He did not come to bring peace.


27 posted on 07/16/2004 1:05:33 PM PDT by lifelongsoldier (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Mohammed didn't have any sons--he only had daughters. Maybe Allah was trying to tell him something.


28 posted on 07/16/2004 1:05:52 PM PDT by Hollywoodghost (Let he who would be free strike the first blow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
The meaning of the verse is clear. How exactly would "context" change it? I have just re-read the verse and the verses before and after it. I see no ambiguity.

There is a possible interpretation that would suggest Jesus only told them to get a sword so that there would be a sword present in Gethsemane for Peter to use to cut off the servant's ear. Since Jesus has been telling his disciples that prophecy must be fulfilled, one could say that the sole purpose of the sword is to fulfill a prophecy. I think that's a bit weak, though.

29 posted on 07/16/2004 1:07:42 PM PDT by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Old Mo never said he was God or the Son of the same--He was just the messenger of God. If he was, he got the message twisted all around. In fact he even said Jesus (Yesu) was greater than he was (This he did get right).


30 posted on 07/16/2004 1:07:47 PM PDT by Hollywoodghost (Let he who would be free strike the first blow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Muhammed is a violent pedophile.

MIGHT I ENHANCE THIS STATEMENT?...

Muhammed is a violent pedophile who died--and stayed dead.

31 posted on 07/16/2004 1:15:06 PM PDT by I'm ALL Right! ("We are going to take things away from you for the common good." translated = "I AM A COMMUNIST")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU

Mother Theresa was very much like Jesus. On the other hand, Osama Bin Laden is very much like Muhammad! 'Nuff said.


32 posted on 07/16/2004 1:18:27 PM PDT by Nataku X (You hear all the time, "Be more like Jesus." But have you ever heard, "Be more like Muhammed"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
I wonder what Jesus would have said about the Israelites slaying Canaanites in the Old Testament. Would he have approved?

I think so!

33 posted on 07/16/2004 1:33:34 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Siamese Princess
To be fair, Christian rulers of the 7th century were by and large a ruthless bunch, but no one holds Justinian and Theodora or any of their royal Christian contemporaries as models for humanity for all time.

What do you mean, "To be fair"? Justinian wasn't the founder of a religion.

34 posted on 07/16/2004 2:14:23 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Revelation 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, 8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

2Kings 19:34 For I will defend this city, to save it, for mine own sake, and for my servant David's sake. 35 And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.

It does seem that God (and all Christians agree that Jesus is God) does use war to destroy his enemies. So I do not think you can say Jesus is a pacifist.

35 posted on 07/16/2004 2:34:32 PM PDT by protest1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
This one is soooooooooooooooooo easy.

Jesus never planned, rehearsed, and executed the slaughter of hundreds of his ideological enemies.

Muh did.

36 posted on 07/16/2004 2:38:47 PM PDT by ChadGore (Vote Bush. He's Earned It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conserv13

Do you have that in a bumper sticker?

I want one.....make it five.


mc


37 posted on 07/16/2004 2:39:51 PM PDT by mcshot ("When you don't think too good, don't think too much" Ted Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: StevenAU
This is so odd that I saw this article today, I have been thinking deeply on this the past couple days;

Something no one is pointing out is the similarities between Muhammad and David Koresh and L. Ron Hubbard-rather than him and Moses and Jesue. The major difference is that Muhammad was successful in sustaining his flock. Both Muhammad and Koresh used their "deity" to have all the women they could want, including the underaged. All 3 were able to use their "religion" for immense personal wealth and power within their community.

Many would shudder to make this comparison publicly I have thought, like Muhammed personally, forget the crusades where Christian followers, but Muhammed himself used the sword to convert people-and L.Ron using deceitful economic pracities and dishonest marketing to convert-all to follow themselves to their direct benefit.

Jesus was humiliated, left this earth with a tunic and sandles, a handful of followers, and nothing else. The other 3 left with alot more money, women, prestige, and power. History has dismissed L.Ron Hubbard and David Koresh as the selfish, powerhungry frauds they were, I hope for the Arabs that one day they are smart enough to do the same to Muhammed.

38 posted on 07/16/2004 4:17:13 PM PDT by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Recall David Dreier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

"If you...have everything spoon fed to you in a madrass
from age 0...you get Ronald McWahabbi."

Well put. Jim Jones was able to do it with so-called Christians, too.


39 posted on 07/16/2004 4:19:21 PM PDT by beelzepug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson