Skip to comments.
The Pornography Plague
Leadership U ^
| Kerby Anderson
Posted on 07/14/2004 7:46:19 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 721-739 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
We are all still waiting for you to provide the laws that make the production of porn illegal.
And again, as previously pointed out several times, if the production of porn is ILLEGAL as you claim, then why is Vivid Video traded on the NYSE?
Face facts, porn is legal. Period.
521
posted on
07/14/2004 3:09:15 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: dorben
Something like a hostage situation seems more like your style Ala Rainbow Head
522
posted on
07/14/2004 3:10:32 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Prostitution harms people. Viewing filmed prostitution makes you an accesory to the crime. The crime was committed for your enjoyment. Prostitution is not illegal in every jurisdiction in this country. Neither is the making of porn. Unless you have some evidence proving otherwise?
523
posted on
07/14/2004 3:10:38 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: malakhi
Even the 26,250 figure would not be three times the numbers of McDonalds But it still supports the the thesis of the article.
524
posted on
07/14/2004 3:10:59 PM PDT
by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
But it still supports the the thesis of the article. On the contrary. By virtue of being demonstrably false, it undermines the author's credibility.
525
posted on
07/14/2004 3:12:41 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: robertpaulsen
Umm...I DID refute it, in the post linked. You lied and used spin. You were caught, and did NOT retract. Thus, you have no credibility.
You've also been caught in numerous misstatements of fact, as well as fallacies of logic, right here.
Now, it seems you're getting mad. Getting too hot for ya?
526
posted on
07/14/2004 3:12:43 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: steve-b
That claim may be a Clintonian "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is" bit of weaseling. For example, if the person making the claim thinks that every convenience store that has "adult" magazines for sale is an "adult bookstore," then there might well be more of them than McDonalds.
527
posted on
07/14/2004 3:12:50 PM PDT
by
jejones
To: malakhi
You've made no attempt to even find out how many adult bookstores there are in the U.S. You have only relied on my sources which you yourself impugn. You don't even know when this article was written.
528
posted on
07/14/2004 3:16:56 PM PDT
by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
To: robertpaulsen
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel? Nope. Jury nullification is.
-BumpkinBob-
529
posted on
07/14/2004 3:17:19 PM PDT
by
tpaine
(No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
To: Phantom Lord
I was attempting to agree with your post 11.
I additionally added my thougts that using a 20 year old panel report by an attorney general NOT in offced to define and restrict "free speech" was a pathetic premise.
If I misunderstood your disagreement with the thesis in general... sorry... Can I assume you agree with the article that was posted then?
or did I understand properly that you generally disagree and that you thought the original poster is asking for a good smackdown again... as you perhaps intimated in your post 11?
530
posted on
07/14/2004 3:18:05 PM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
You have only relied on my sources You mean when debating you we should NOT rely on your sources when arguing against your position?
Later you posted another source that also proved your original source to be a lie.
You have 2 options. Get better sources or quit posting on FR.
531
posted on
07/14/2004 3:18:44 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Robert_Paulson2
or did I understand properly that you generally disagree and that you thought the original poster is asking for a good smackdown again... as you perhaps intimated in your post 11? That would be correct. I either am not paying attention, totally misread your post to me, or need a beer. All 3 actually.
I got the impression from your post that you thought I was in full support of Tailgunner Joe and his outrageous claims and statements.
532
posted on
07/14/2004 3:20:33 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Phantom Lord
He's already engaged in the third option: threatening to kill those who disagree with him. He later tried to say that it was just a joke.
533
posted on
07/14/2004 3:21:02 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
To: malakhi
Absolutely, you make an excellent point. Now would you say that your an above average parent, average, or below average? Now when I ask that question, I'm thinking about all the gangland violence and perponderance rap music in my environment.
So the question becomes, how do we perserve and balance your right to raise your children as you see fit, with the rights of other children to have a better chance than given to them by their gang familes, and crack, alcohol, or work addicted parents?
They're the ones suffering because their parents, not you, refuse to provide the support and supervision they need? And in turn there is a greater chance of them causing havoc, needing welfare, etc.
I am not saying that more government is the answer. I am suggesting that philosophically, we need to change our attitude of avoiding conflict and start ensuring that the world is the place where "we" would want to be raised.
If we do the job, the government will have no need to step in and do it for us.
To: robertpaulsen
And where does Burger King fit into all this? I don't know...OTOH, I never understood why the founder of Wendy's would want to associate his daughter's name with the phrase "hot and juicy," either.
535
posted on
07/14/2004 3:23:21 PM PDT
by
jejones
To: Tailgunner Joe
You don't even know when this article was written. The "20 times the number of adult bookstores" quote you cited comes from an article entitled "The Business of Pornography", written by Eric Schlosser, and published in the February 10, 1997 edition of US News & World Report.
536
posted on
07/14/2004 3:23:24 PM PDT
by
malakhi
To: SanityFromTheLeftCoast
So the question becomes, how do we perserve and balance your right to raise your children as you see fit, with the rights of other children to have a better chance than given to them by their gang familes, and crack, alcohol, or work addicted parents? Private charity. Vouchers.
537
posted on
07/14/2004 3:23:29 PM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Phantom Lord
The source for the claim that adult bookstores outnumber McDonald's restaurants in the United States by a margin of at least three to one is: "Effect of Pornography on Women and Children," U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on Juvenile Justice, 98th Congress, 2nd Session, 1984, 227.
Take it up with them.
538
posted on
07/14/2004 3:24:12 PM PDT
by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Every time an anti-porn thread is posted here, it never fails to bring out the apologists for perversion. They hate anyone who would dare say anything against a business which debases women and destroys children. The most sick of the sick, when they become bored with these perversions, turn to little animals, hurting and killing them to satisfy their lusts. They are a sickening bunch, for sure. And every perversion they commit they have first seen it done in magazines or videos.That's why they don't want it stopped.
539
posted on
07/14/2004 3:25:24 PM PDT
by
swampfox98
(We are at war! We have been at war since 9/11. How smart do you have to be to understand this?)
To: Poohbah
It was a joke, but I have no reason to believe that the threats I was responding to were jokes.
540
posted on
07/14/2004 3:26:06 PM PDT
by
Tailgunner Joe
(You CAN legislate morality.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 721-739 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson