Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pornography Plague
Leadership U ^ | Kerby Anderson

Posted on 07/14/2004 7:46:19 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 721-739 next last
To: robertpaulsen

And since we don't, you cannot claim that porn has slowed its decline.


341 posted on 07/14/2004 12:22:06 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Yep and there are some people like John Ashcroft? who think bare breasts on artwork is porn. That's not where I am coming from. I used to have a little Venus of Willendorf pendant.


342 posted on 07/14/2004 12:22:53 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
There is no law against it. If there were, these folks would not have gotten business licenses. Are you always this obtuse, or do you just save it for me.

Proof positive liberals don't think... they feel.

343 posted on 07/14/2004 12:23:22 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The law is not being enforced.

Laws against obscenity are being enforced. However, generally speaking, pornography is not obscene. Simply stated, considering how many Americans buy pornography, it would seem that porn is accepted by society.

344 posted on 07/14/2004 12:27:21 PM PDT by Modernman ("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: cherry
that goes along with what Jeffrey Dahmer's lawyer stated: that Dahmer from an early age was into porn and masterbated at least 5 times a day....he could not control his desires....

Since when is anything a criminal defense lawyer says beyond reproach? You have to be kidding me.

No offense, cherry, but if your argument rests on trusting Jeffrey Dahmer, or Ted Bundy, it's a pretty weak one.

345 posted on 07/14/2004 12:28:07 PM PDT by horatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Junior

And you cannot claim that there is no link.


346 posted on 07/14/2004 12:28:16 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

The impetus is on you to prove the link, that porn causes rapes.

You have failed to do so, since the evidence shows that as porn became more mainstream, the reporting of rapes plummeted.

To insist that somehow rape would have plummeted more had porn not been around is a curious position. I can't wait to see how you prove it.


347 posted on 07/14/2004 12:30:42 PM PDT by horatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
All of a sudden porn's acceptance by society has become the basis for your argument.

I thought it didn't matter what society thought.

Don't cry when conservatives ban porn and justify it as the people's will.

348 posted on 07/14/2004 12:30:44 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

We can justify all sorts of things as "the people's will." That's not a republic, it's the mob rule that the Founding Fathers feared.

One of the things we can justify is abortion. The majority of people believe that first trimester abortions should be kept legal - are "the people" right about that?

True conservatives don't believe in banning things willy-nilly. It only serves to feed the beast of intrusive government.


349 posted on 07/14/2004 12:33:29 PM PDT by horatio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

Once more. It has nothing to do with my partaking or not partaking of this stuff. It has to do with my right to do so if I should so choose. It is a question of liberty.


350 posted on 07/14/2004 12:34:23 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: horatio

I'm not the one who said porn should be legal because so many people buy it.


351 posted on 07/14/2004 12:35:52 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Ah. The old legality equals acceptance.

Cheating on your spouse is legal. A lot of people do it. Therefore, that indicates an acceptance by sociey.

Considering how people are buy their porn (in adult bookstores, through the mail, via the internet), I don't see the level of societal acceptance that you do. More like tolerance.

But if we've learned anything from the homosexual lobby, tolerance is but the first step towards acceptance, isn't it?

352 posted on 07/14/2004 12:37:16 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

And I haven't. I have said there is no evidence of said link, but I haven't claimed it did not exist. However, the evidence (rapes and sexual assaults declining with porn usage increasing) is evidence, however indirect, that no such link exists.


353 posted on 07/14/2004 12:37:17 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: horatio
We can justify all sorts of things as "the people's will." That's not a republic, it's the mob rule that the Founding Fathers feared.

Robespierre lives!

354 posted on 07/14/2004 12:38:20 PM PDT by Poohbah (Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I hope you didn't misss his jury nullification argument in post #301.

That's anopther one that will go over well at the NAACP convention and with his anarchist "fellow travellers."

355 posted on 07/14/2004 12:40:06 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We're talking about whether the laws against obscenity are being enforced. I'm telling you that they are and that pornography is not obscene and that states cannot therefore use prostitution laws to punish people for making it or performing in it. Remember the three part test:

1)That the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; AND

2)That the work depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable law; AND

T3) That a reasonable person would find that the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political and scientific value.

Though porn might meet 1 and 3, the people of this country, through their unwillingess to convict porn producers and through their massive consumption of porn have decided that the second requirement has not been met. Therefore, since porn is not obscene, you cannot do an end-run around the law by going after porn producers with anti-prostitution laws.

356 posted on 07/14/2004 12:44:18 PM PDT by Modernman ("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Well Pube, we learn more and more about your far left dementia every day.

Yesterday your weak position on drug abuse came to light. Do you also share your anarchist friends' belief that prostitution and the sale of human organs should be legal as well?

Share with us!

357 posted on 07/14/2004 12:44:38 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I hope you didn't misss his jury nullification argument in post #301.

If 12 of one's fellow citizens refuse to deliver a conviction, what do you propose to do about it?

358 posted on 07/14/2004 12:45:13 PM PDT by Poohbah (Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
you cannot do an end-run around the law by going after porn producers with anti-prostitution laws.

The hell we can't.

359 posted on 07/14/2004 12:47:48 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: harbinger of doom; Bella_Bru
Suppose a country was discovered where you could sell magazines of food dishes scantily clad in chives or watch streaming videos of covered plates of great grub being slowly uncovered set to great elevator music. Wouldn't some think something had gone wrong with the appetite for food?

I subscribe to Fine Cooking magazine. Who knew I was into food porn? I best burn my cookbooks.

360 posted on 07/14/2004 12:48:42 PM PDT by malakhi (Waiting for TJ to advocate the death of Julia Child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 721-739 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson