Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Sides With Pornographers Again
eagleforum.org ^
| July 14, 2004
| Phyllis Schlafly
Posted on 07/13/2004 10:11:42 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 501-518 next last
To: Servant of the 9
I don't want to see any more 'interpreting' or 'the founders really meant' on the first amendment, than I do on the second Amendment.Hate to break the news to you, but the "interpreting" is done by those who claim that pornography is "speech".
61
posted on
07/13/2004 11:07:18 AM PDT
by
inquest
(Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Better start building those jails and prepare for a slowdown of all things in this country as you will probably have to put at least half of the population in jail.
And how will you know who has it? Let me know when you send your Vice & Virtue squads around, I need to make sure I have enough ammo.
62
posted on
07/13/2004 11:07:30 AM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(It's for the children = It takes a village)
To: Melas
Conservatives don't give a damn about the laws of those countries whose socialists have succeded in unionizing their whores.
To: jwalsh07
Then there is not an undo burden requiring porn companies to assure that the delivery of porn is not to minors through the use of an ID card. You can't have it both ways.Please show us how to do that.
64
posted on
07/13/2004 11:08:06 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
To: Phantom Lord
"faster than a stripper can get naked"
just curious PL... how fast is that???
</ grin >
65
posted on
07/13/2004 11:08:13 AM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: Phantom Lord
"faster than a stripper can get naked"
just curious PL... how fast is that???
</ grin >
66
posted on
07/13/2004 11:08:19 AM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
To: Phantom Lord
You didn't see my ;-)???
I was being sarcastic.
67
posted on
07/13/2004 11:08:36 AM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(It's for the children = It takes a village)
To: Poohbah
68
posted on
07/13/2004 11:08:59 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Phantom Lord
porn has been around since the beginning of manSo has "the world's oldest profession."
So has murder.
To: Tailgunner Joe
Conservatives don't give a damn about the laws of those countries whose socialists have succeded in unionizing their whores.Just out of curiousity, how do you propose to keep pornography from other countries from being viewed by Internet users in the United States?
70
posted on
07/13/2004 11:09:23 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
To: Robert_Paulson2
Depends on the club and the pace of her first song.
71
posted on
07/13/2004 11:09:27 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Bella_Bru
72
posted on
07/13/2004 11:09:48 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Pornography is nothing but filmed prostitution. It should be completely banned. What about scenes in non-pornographic movies where an actor and actress kiss and perform other sexual conduct? Is that nothing more than filmed prostitution?
73
posted on
07/13/2004 11:10:11 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
To: jwalsh07
COPA didn't actually do anything about that issue.
Try again.
74
posted on
07/13/2004 11:10:22 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
To: Poohbah
Quite true. But minors can and do buy tobacco and alcohol routinely over the internet.Some minors and majors also routinely rape and kill people even though those acts are proscribed by law.
75
posted on
07/13/2004 11:11:16 AM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Tailgunner Joe
If you want prostitution to be legal, just say so. I do, actually.
76
posted on
07/13/2004 11:11:33 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members" -Groucho Marx)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Your probably infavor of Alabama's law that makes it illegal to sell, or own a device for the manual stimulation of the genitals aren't you.
77
posted on
07/13/2004 11:11:58 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Melas
That's because Amazon.com is a RETAILER with a website. Amazon.com is in the business of delivering REAL goods to your house.
Amazon.com also delivers music downloads, e-books, and e-docs. Their checkout process is essentially the same.
www.xxxswedes.com may or may not be in the business of delivering real goods. It could just be in the business of charging $5 to view some pictures electronically, or maybe even for free. Either way, it's a Swedish website, and congress lacks the authority to do anything about it.
Are you saying Congress has no authority because the servers are offshore? The MP3-sharing people would love to hear that.
To: Phantom Lord
Thank you for admitting that you support legalizing prostitution.
Like sell our organs. They are mine. I own them, and thus should be allowed to sell them if I want.
Of course you cannot sell your own organs, and this proves that your body is not your property.
When a woman gets an abortion, the clinic sells her baby's body parts for profit, but she doesn't see a dime.
We conservatives are going to fix the problem of mass baby-killing you social liberals are so fond of too
To: Melas
the religious law enforcement folks, disguising themselves as conservatives ARE the socialists amongst us these days.
They are liberal in their worship of govenment as the protector and provider of good... for all of us.
The idea of turning off their computer and NOT visiting such sites being a choice they can make, is superceded by the horror they sense, that somewhere out there, somebody is sinning on the internet... oh the horror of it.
80
posted on
07/13/2004 11:13:19 AM PDT
by
Robert_Paulson2
(the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 501-518 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson