Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Sides With Pornographers Again
eagleforum.org ^
| July 14, 2004
| Phyllis Schlafly
Posted on 07/13/2004 10:11:42 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 501-518 next last
To: Tailgunner Joe
I understand that you think this unjust, but the law is on my side.Which law would that be? In which clause or article of the Constitution did the authors and representatives of the states give over to Congress the power to control and/or prohibit pornography in their state?
341
posted on
07/13/2004 3:10:29 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: Tailgunner Joe
You perform self-exposure just fine on your own. Your bias has you blind to your dishonesty. It's so transparent.
342
posted on
07/13/2004 3:12:17 PM PDT
by
Zon
To: Tailgunner Joe
There are many things the law does not permit you to do to your own body. I understand that you think this unjust, but the law is on my side. The law permits abortion, therefore, women truly do have the "right" to choose.
Or maybe the law is wrong sometimes?
343
posted on
07/13/2004 3:13:38 PM PDT
by
timm22
To: tacticalogic
The Tenth amendment for starters.
To: Tailgunner Joe; All
"Just like the left, when they have nothing to say they just attack and smear." Unlike you, of course, who has done ZERO but call others "whores", "anarchists", etc., and have given NO justification or evidence for your own mad assertions, like the one about Christians being the only ones who will liberate Iran.
Watch out for those strippers, Joe...they're leading you astray!!
345
posted on
07/13/2004 3:14:19 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: All
"My son, be attentive to my wisdom; incline your ear to my understanding; that you may keep discretion, and your lips may guard knowledge. For the lips of an immoral woman drip honey, and her speech is smoother than oil, but in the end she is bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword. Her feet go down to death; her steps follow the path to Sheol; she does not ponder the path of life; her ways wander, and she does not know it.
"And now, O sons, listen to me, and do not depart from the words of my mouth. Keep your way far from her, and do not go near the door of her house, lest you give your honor to others and your years to the merciless, lest aliens take their fill of your wealth, and your labors go to the house of a foreigner."...[Proverbs 5:1-10]
To: timm22
Is a woman who pays for an abortion guaranteed a dead fetus?
Should women be allowed to sell their murdered fetuses?
To: Long Cut
You defend whoredom. I'm simply pointing out this fact. It's no smear.
To: inquest
From your same source:
All attempts to delude the people, or to abuse their understanding by exercise of the pretended arts of witchcraft, conjuration, inchantment, or sorcery or by pretended prophecies, shall be punished by ducking and whipping at the discretion of a jury, not exceeding 15. stripes.
Thomas Jefferson, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments
Spot on - let's follow that one as well !
349
posted on
07/13/2004 3:17:45 PM PDT
by
jimt
To: Tailgunner Joe; All
"I am ready to meet my judgement." Sure. Guys like you are NEVER around when the butcher's bill comes due. Just like other fanatics...like Arafat, bin Laden, etc...somehow, when the battle starts, they dissappear and send others to die or be killed.
Sell it to someone else.
350
posted on
07/13/2004 3:17:57 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: F16Fighter
If you want to be honest about clamoring about the First Amendment, then ANYTHING can theoretically be construed as "free speech" -- including murder and rape and threats. I suppose someone could use murder or rape as a form of speech, but those activities could still be restricted. That's because murder, rape, and threats of violence violate the rights of individuals. Your right to free speech does not extend to violating the rights of others.
However, a porno violates no one's rights, so it can't be compared to murder or rape.
351
posted on
07/13/2004 3:18:44 PM PDT
by
timm22
To: Tailgunner Joe
I'm pointing out the fact that you're a fascistic statist. No smear.
352
posted on
07/13/2004 3:19:17 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: F16Fighter
If you want to be honest about clamoring about the First Amendment, then ANYTHING can theoretically be construed as "free speech" -- including murder and rape and threats. Murder and rape are not speech or the press.
Construing actions as 'speech' is another of the evils of interpreting the Constitution.
So9
To: Bella_Bru
I never think about porn unless and until I notice a FR thread about it.
354
posted on
07/13/2004 3:20:06 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
To: Tailgunner Joe; tacticalogic; Long Cut
Which law would that be? In which clause or article of the Constitution did the authors and representatives of the states give over to Congress the power to control and/or prohibit pornography in their state?The Tenth amendment for starters.
Congratulations, Joe! You just failed Constitutional Law 101, unless you're a flaming liberal who thinks that the Tenth Amendment grants enormous power to the Federal government at the expense of the several states.
355
posted on
07/13/2004 3:20:25 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Technical difficulties have temporarily interrupted this tagline. Please stand by.)
To: Long Cut
You use the word fascist the way a commie does.
To: Tailgunner Joe
And you toss around fire and brimstone like an Islamic terrorist does.
Gee, Joe, with your debating tactics, I don't know what I'll do...
"You use the word fascist the way a commie does."
ROFLMAO!!!!
357
posted on
07/13/2004 3:24:17 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: Tailgunner Joe
Should women be allowed to sell their murdered fetuses? No. The fetus is not part of their body, it is a unique human.
358
posted on
07/13/2004 3:24:31 PM PDT
by
timm22
To: Poohbah; Tailgunner Joe
Congratulations, Joe! You just failed Constitutional Law 101Considering the article is about the USSC striking down a federal law, I think that's a pretty fair assesment.
359
posted on
07/13/2004 3:24:53 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: timm22
"... a porno violates no one's rights, so it can't be compared to murder or rape." Oh, but it violates THEIR "rights" to be free of temptation. Y'see, because THEY doubt themselves in the presence of smut, OTHERS who can must be punished.
360
posted on
07/13/2004 3:26:51 PM PDT
by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 501-518 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson