Posted on 07/13/2004 10:11:42 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
It makes sense, but where would you derive the authority to mandate a .sex or .xxx extension? I have doubts about the legitimacy of such an act in the USA, let alone across the WORD WIDE web. We do tend to forget that the internet isn't American.
Those who purchase, distribute or recieve pornography are aiding and abetting a crime.
All pornography should be siezed as contraband and destroyed once it is no longer needed as evidence.
Apparently common sense and common decency are too much to expect.
I defy anyone w/ children to protect them from the rampant filth and deviancy flooding our culture today.
The 1st amendment was not written for the protection of pornographers.
I think they agree. There was a move a couple of years ago by some of the big porn sites to have a .PRN or .XXX top level domain created to get people off their backs and help their customers find them, but the powers that be wanted nothing to do with it.
Some say it was because of taste. I think they are afraid to see accurate statistics on the percentage of bandwidth really devoted to porn.
So9
Right Joe, freedom be damned.
Me thinks TJ is in need of a good BJ.
Anarchy is not freedom.
Yes, one has to understand the sexuality of humans.....the most sexual animals on the planet.
Also, I have often wondered why the press and LE go after individuals as if they have committed mass murder when "porn" is found on their computers but you never see the press and LE going after the sites from which the "porn" was downloaded.
It makes one go.....Hmmmm.
I managed, are you handicapped, or just 'slow'?
The 1st amendment was not written for the protection of pornographers.
Show me where it says that in the Constitution.
So9
How is porn anarchy?
It hardly surprises me that you have a filthy mind. The reason you want net pornography to be legal is that you are addicted to it.
However, the net is the WORLD at your fingertips. We've yet to come up with a way to control the net like the cash register at the bookstore.
If you support legalized prostitution, just say so.
Why do you have such an over riding fear that somewhere, someone is having a good time?
There are ways but social liberals are against them.
Actually, I would have no problem with prostitution becoming legal. However, that's going off on a tangent. Like it or not pornography is not prostitution just because you say it is. Even if it were, the films made in countries where it's legal, wouldn't be evidence of a crime. Wakey wakey, it's the WORLD WIDE web.
Some people have a good time pumping their veins full of heroin and I won't abide that either.
Prostitution is nothing more than the combination of sex and commerce. Which are you against?
And as free, soverign individuals there are many things we should be able to do with our bodies that we currently can not. Like sell our organs. They are mine. I own them, and thus should be allowed to sell them if I want. They are the same as any other piece of private property.
Filming an act of prostitution doesn't make it legal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.