Skip to comments.
Police state, ho!
Razormouth.com ^
| 6/28/04
| John Whitehead
Posted on 06/29/2004 9:27:45 AM PDT by ksen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-263 next last
To: af_vet_rr
Hear hear.
My grandfather inserted coded messages into his RFE broadcasts. There were infiltrators at the other end of that message. The Cold War, and the hot wars you mention, were a much higher stakes game than most Americans realize.
221
posted on
07/01/2004 7:16:22 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: af_vet_rr
If there wasn't an uprising during the 8 long years of the Clinton presidency,then NOTHING will motivate anyone to do anything. Like I said to Don Joe, you might be right, but Clinton did have to turn the OKC bombing into an anti-right Kristallnacht because he was under pressure.
222
posted on
07/01/2004 7:19:06 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
Um duhhh, that would be "Reichstag fire."
223
posted on
07/01/2004 7:19:46 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: ksen
When the toy soldiers are all put back in the closet and we are safely tucked in bed.
224
posted on
07/01/2004 7:26:41 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Interests in common are commonly abused.)
To: ksen
Don't wake up the Civil Warriors, please.
225
posted on
07/01/2004 7:28:47 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Interests in common are commonly abused.)
To: eno_
If we can do it to Iran, we can do it here at home. Breaking up an IRS employee's marriage with false rumors of infidelity, or narcing on his kids' pot smoking will do much more to strike a blow than any gun. I am not sure if I am reading this correctly. Are you advocating lying to destroy?
226
posted on
07/01/2004 7:32:54 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
Comment #227 Removed by Moderator
To: cinFLA
228
posted on
07/01/2004 7:49:55 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
What do you mean? That was my question to you.
229
posted on
07/01/2004 7:52:03 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
It seems like you had a specific meaning in mind. Perhaps you could clarify. I made a comparison, which should be clear from my comment you quoted: Non-violent action is more effective.
230
posted on
07/01/2004 7:55:17 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
It seems like you had a specific meaning in mind. Perhaps you could clarify. I made a comparison, which should be clear from my comment you quoted: Non-violent action is more effective. As I posted, I was referring to your statement about using false rumors to take down IRS employees. I wanted to make sure I was reading this correctly before commenting.
231
posted on
07/01/2004 7:57:03 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
What part of this don't you get:
I made a comparison, which should be clear from my comment you quoted: Non-violent action is more effective.
I would be interested to hear your comment. Do you think violence is more effective?
I would caution you not to put words in my mouth. "Taking down" are your words regarding the IRS agents, not mine.
232
posted on
07/01/2004 8:02:18 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
Here is your comment which I posted exactly in my first post. Are you advocating destroying a man's marriage with false rumors????
"Breaking up an IRS employee's marriage with false rumors of infidelity,"
233
posted on
07/01/2004 8:11:09 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
No. I said it is more effective than killing him with bullets. I didn't advocate either.
234
posted on
07/01/2004 8:13:26 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
No. I said it is more effective than killing him with bullets. I didn't advocate eitherOk. I wanted to make sure you were not advocating such before I commented.
235
posted on
07/01/2004 8:18:07 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
I wanted to make sure No, you wanted to play provacateur, for which you should be banned.
236
posted on
07/01/2004 8:20:52 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: eno_
No, you wanted to play provacateur, for which you should be banned. Interesting. I was not sure of your post so I asked you to clarify. I made no personal insults or comments and when you answered, I accepted your answer with no derogatory comments. Would you rather I had started flaming without understanding your post? Please.
237
posted on
07/01/2004 8:23:28 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: ksen
Police state, ho!I thought this article was about Hillary Rodham Clinton.
238
posted on
07/01/2004 8:33:29 AM PDT
by
JesseHousman
(Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
To: JesseHousman
You forgot the < rimshot! > tag
239
posted on
07/01/2004 8:36:06 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
To: af_vet_rr
Voting for fring party candidates is useless,an activity to be decried and derided.The ONLY uselful activity,is to work within a majority party.Keyboard generals,for the most part,are all talk,no do.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260, 261-263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson