Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1st chemical attack by terrorists in Iraq:
WorldNetDaily ^ | 6/26/04 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 06/26/2004 12:19:17 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: wagglebee

Well he said he had them before he said he didn't have them. So Kerry has his bases covered.


41 posted on 06/26/2004 12:50:48 PM PDT by james_f_hall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Did this happen today?

Any other news source reporting this??


42 posted on 06/26/2004 12:51:27 PM PDT by sissyjane (You're either with us or against us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
You have to understand liberals, they're not WMD unless they are found all together, assembled, armed and aimed at the USA with the capability of getting them here on a missile.

OTOH, if they are located in the USA an assualt rifle is a WMD.

43 posted on 06/26/2004 12:51:41 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop; Cap Huff; Boot Hill

Anyone subscribe to Farrah?


44 posted on 06/26/2004 12:52:05 PM PDT by Dog (In Memory of Pat Tillman ---- ---- ---- American Hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It seemes this article has only one sentance that actually relates to its title, stuff like that pisses me off.


45 posted on 06/26/2004 12:52:27 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

To be fair, the weapons depots are not necessarily WMD....mostly not in fact.

But, it is a fact that some WMD have been found.

Very old WMD, but still WMD. This is why it probably is not making more news (I wouldn't be reporting much on WMD left over from when everybody knew they were making it).

However, does anybody know if they were required to get rid of their WMD from the 1980's? Surely UN resolutions required such. If so, this shows a clear breach of the UN resolutions on WMD, and that makes it news. I still would not blast it above the fold on the front page, but it would be worthy of below the fold, front-page coverage if this is the case.

And surely it is as many times as Iraq was supposed to destroy its weapons. Does anybody know for sure?


46 posted on 06/26/2004 12:53:29 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh in PA

Either Saddam "destroyed" this particular weapon or Saddam "never built" it. Democrats, enemies, terrorists, or dictators, they all speak the same language, perhaps because they are one in the same.


47 posted on 06/26/2004 12:53:44 PM PDT by dufekin (John F. Kerry. Irrational, improvident, backward, seditious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dog
How reliable is this guy?

He's essentially worthless. Knows less than nothing about defense/security issues. Hypemonger.

48 posted on 06/26/2004 12:53:57 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
It seemes this article has only one sentance that actually relates to its title, stuff like that pisses me off.

As is so often the case with WND.

49 posted on 06/26/2004 12:55:36 PM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi

I would need some sort of verifiable source.....the WMD mention of the attack takes up the lede and I think another paragraph or two, with the rest being background on the threat of an attack.

That isn't exactly convincing that their claim that a WMD attack occurred within the green zone is accurate. They don't even have a source for the claim.

It is true that some WMD have been found, however.


50 posted on 06/26/2004 12:55:52 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

300 Tons of "scrap metal" was sold by Iraq in the 3 months before the war started to Turkey and some other country's. The "scrap metal" turned out to be MWD manufacturing equipment. How come this wasn't on the main stream media?


51 posted on 06/26/2004 1:01:25 PM PDT by Groutrig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

From: http://www.dod.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040626-secdef0943.html

SEC. RUMSFELD: With respect to the first question, the so-called Iraqi Survey Group, which is a multi-national group, are pouring over documentation and interviewing former Iraqi scientists. The first head of that group, Mr. David Kay, concluded, as has his successor, Mr. Delfer, that in fact Iraq had filed a fraudulent declaration to the United Nations. The process of uncovering chemical or biological or nuclear program materials is continuing and within the last week a number of weapons containing various types of chemicals have in fact been found and are currently being tested. The last piece that I saw suggested it was mustard gas. And although it's a first report, it appeared to be old and something that had not been declared as the declaration to the United Nations required. Time will tell what else might be found.


52 posted on 06/26/2004 1:02:24 PM PDT by rwfok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Exactly..


53 posted on 06/26/2004 1:03:09 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Groutrig
I know there have been some extraordinarily radiation level readings taken of scrap metals from Iraq.
54 posted on 06/26/2004 1:04:36 PM PDT by cripplecreek (you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I know there have been some extraordinarily radiation level readings taken of scrap metals from Iraq.

They weren't "extraordinary" there was simply radiation. Someone decided to sell scrap from their old reactor, apparently.

55 posted on 06/26/2004 1:10:25 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit

The libs have a mantra (1) the U.S. is evil (2) Hussein was a benevolent dictator who meant us, Israel, and his people no harm (besides Israel is evil too and deserve what they get) (3) he had no wmds and didn't ally with terrorists (4) the U.S. is evil (5) there are no terrorists inside Iraq and even if they are there, they are not allied with Al-Qaeda, and anyway we created all the world's terrorists and finally (6) The U.S. is evil. If everything else fails, ignore all the evidence of your failures, stick your head firmly into the sand, and refer to 1, 4, and 6.


56 posted on 06/26/2004 1:16:21 PM PDT by driftless ( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
I did it. I seriesly apologize for my HUGH error in judgement.

You sound deeply saddened.

57 posted on 06/26/2004 1:22:51 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

OK cool, then then my previos ROC really means ROK Republic of Corea er I mean Korea.


58 posted on 06/26/2004 1:25:36 PM PDT by edchambers (Where are we going and why am I in this hand-basket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rwfok

Thanks. That is definitely newsworthy, front page newsworthy, if further testing does reveal they were not declared to the UN.


59 posted on 06/26/2004 1:25:40 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: South40; RandallFlagg
Wow, been here over 3 years and never knew.

I thought I was FReeper hip but I never heard about the moose and your sister?

Seriesly, LOL.

60 posted on 06/26/2004 1:28:41 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson