1st chemical attack by terrorists in Iraq:

WorldNetDaily ^ | 6/26/04 | Joseph Farah

[wagglebee]

The Washington Times reports military officials have uncovered about 8,700 weapons depots and continue to find new ones.

But I thought the 'Rats said that there were no WMDs in Iraq.

[cripplecreek]

Japanese WWII weapons cache was found in china about a week ago.

[South40]

The sources say the munitions were old, but still potentially lethal.

Rendering them (and this topic) trivial, meaning it should be relegated to chat.

But, seriosly, I doubt you'll see any mention of this by the leftist media because those weapons don't exist, doncha know.

[RandallFlagg]

But, seriosly, I doubt you'll see---

I'm sure you meant, "Seriesly."

[Recovering Hermit]

...terrorists in Iraq are trying to get their hands on the Saddam Hussein regime's chemical weapons of mass destruction...

There are no WMD's in Iraq. I thought we were just there for the oil.

[South40]

I'm sure you meant, "Seriesly."

No, I didn't. I meant "seriously".

I have no idea what seriesly means.

[Recovering Hermit]

I'm sure you meant, "Seriesly."

I'm kinda liking the new "seriosly", seriesly is getting old.

I'm series, this could be a hugh change.

I'm going to take a shower now, please keep me updated.

[UNGN]

Seriesly, as in Seriesly Hugh.

or to use it in a sentence:

This is Hugh, I'm series.

[RandallFlagg]

Oh, it's a FReeper running joke. One of many intentionally misspelled words we use...

Serious = series
Huge = hugh
There's many others.

But whatever you do, doooon't mention the moose and your sister!

[mattdono]

Exactly. I'm a little confused myself. I heard the President loud and clear say there was WMDs and they were concerned about them falling into terrorist's (any terrorist's) hands.

But, then, I remember the media and the democrats saying that the President lied and there weren't any WMDs and the threat of terrorists getting their hands on any WMDs was really just "concocted down in Texas".

So, there actually was WMDs?

But...wait...um, that would mean that the media and the democrats are LYING SCUM THAT ARE ACTIVELY WORKING AGAINST THEIR OWN COUNTRY JUST TO PURSUE A NARROW POLITICAL INTEREST.

Well, well. That's certainly enlightening. Maybe the media will now massively cover this story and admit that the President and the administration were right along on?

</sarcasm>

[cripplecreek]

I asked that question and only received "are you looged in as an answer" I gave up after that.

[RandallFlagg]

What he said..

[ex-Texan]

Saddams weapons are now in the hands of terrorists.

[mattdono]

But whatever you do, doooon't mention the moose and your sister!

And, God forbid, do NOT mention cheese!

It sets off a scientific chain reaction which results in massive postings about moose, cheese, and moose & cheese.

[EGPWS]

But whatever you do, doooon't mention the moose and your sister!

LoL's!!!! ROTFLMAO

[spoiler2]

Hopefully, in the next live briefing from Baghdad, they will make a point of mentioning this, with the emphasis on 'WMD-chemical weapon attack' to the press.

[cripplecreek]

ALLRIGHT WHO GOOSED THE MOOSE?

[EGPWS]

Saddams weapons are now in the hands of terrorists.

That being the case, it's comforting to know that WMD don't exist.

Er, wait a minute....

[RandallFlagg]

I did it. I seriesly apologize for my HUGH error in judgement.

[the Real fifi]

We have found these weapons..it was reported, as for the rest of the story, I call this publication Whirled Nut Daily..take it with a grain of salt.