bring the highlanders over from scotland for crowd control.
Let them rage. If they were in charge Saddam would still be feeding people into shredders.
Politics.
Is there any doubt that if Clinton or Gore had launched a war in Afghanistan and then Iraq, even without the assist of France and Germany (who probably would have been against it anyway), the people of these nations would not be so hostile?
The 'unilateral' NATO war in Kosovo (and frankly, that was more 'unliateral' than the Iraqi campaign is) wasn't greeted with this much negativity, or at least, the negativity wasn't
And by and large, domestic critics of Clinton weren't employing anywhere near the hysterics that critics of Bush currently are.
The left, once again, are like insolent children. Ehat will it take to mature them? 30,000 dead in NYC? 60,000 thousand dead in London? 180,000 dead in coordinated worldwide WMD attacks? What?
From what I hear, Bush is handling it fine.
What else should we expect from a nation of terrorists?
See this article.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1149732/posts
"large demonstrations"
There aren't enough people in the entire country to have a really large demonstration.
Sad though, to think of how many of the NYPD and NYPD who died a hero's death on 9/11 were Irish.
Just goes to show that all you need to be to show up on the media, is to hate America.
Maybe bush should stay home and tend to business here?
eff the EU
We shall remember.
I didn't read all posts, but to comment on the headline... Of course they were hostile, they were wasted. (No offense to any Irish posters)
Bush is brave for going to a land that is still full of local terrorists(I.R.A., et al.).
Move over France. I might have to add Ireland to my list of boycotted countries.