MODESTO False alarm near ex-Peterson home

sfgate.com ^ | 6/23/04 | Charlie Goodyear

[juzcuz]

Have you EVER seen Jackie Peterson shed a tear over Laci or HER grandson??
---
No, but I've seen her breathing alot of oxygen..I think, or who knows what's in that tank attached to her nose.... lol..

[Canadian Outrage]

I don't get FOX sis so please KEEP ME POSTED!!

[Canadian Outrage]

Yes I wonder too LOL!!

[sissyjane]

Never Mind---

It's the Ed Steele stuff that we already know about!

[juzcuz]

It's a further slice and dice of Brochini..

[Howlin]

Good for you! I thought about doing the exact same thing, but had a houseful of people and couldn't compose A thought, much less a whole email!

[juzcuz]

I'm starting to feel sorry for Poor Brochini... awe poor guy..

[Howlin]

Is it just me, or are the talking heads 1) Mostly pro-defense, and 2) completely out of control?

These people are like a living force that need to be fed constantly.........it's unbelievable!

[Canadian Outrage]

That's okay, may they air it often!!

[Howlin]

I'm sick of them tearing him apart. But it tells me one thing: Geragos doesn't think he has anything at all that will prove his client's innocence. I know he doesn't have to, but if his client WAS innocent, he'd be able to prove it!

Don't forget: nobody saw Laci after 7:00 P.M. on the 23rd, but she was dead.

Where was Scott? Nobody saw him either.

[sissyjane]

It totally -sucks-to use my youngest son's favorite saying!!

This is worse than the OJ trial, because at least then we had the opportunity to watch the trial!!

[Canadian Outrage]

Remember Geragos was gonna go a step further and NAME the REAL KILLERS. In fact, they could be making an arrest very soon, maybe in about 2 hours!! CRIPES WHY would anyone believe ANYTHING Geragos has to say? He's a great manipulator and liar but he's also a pompous Ass. He ALWAYS, in every single trial, makes these courthouse steps, GRANDIOSE statements about what hee's going to show or produce. Does he EVER do it - NO!!

[juzcuz]

Don't forget: nobody saw Laci after 7:00 P.M. on the 23rd,
---
No, 8:30 PM on the 23rd Sharon talked to Laci..
There are no witnesses after that time. What was Snotts alibi? Well, she was dressed in my blue pj's.....

[MEG33]

Be happy...and Greta isn't there.It's over....and "Bronchini is sloppy, stupid, almost criminal to delete that woman's observations from his report...String him up(my take on the consensus of the panel)Sigh...

Ignore that Steel said the info was in another report...they did... and chastised him for even saying it.

[Howlin]

Nobody SAW her after 7:00 P.M. And nobody saw him either.

[juzcuz]

Right- But, her mother talked to her at 8:30 Pm on the 23rd. So something happend after that...

[Howlin]

Police say so-called missing details provided to Peterson defense

BRIAN SKOLOFF, Associated Press Writer
Friday, June 25, 2004

---

(06-25) 13:43 PDT REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (AP) --

Modesto police said Friday that Scott Peterson's lawyer tried to trick the jury into believing authorities conspired to hide a sympathetic witness when, in fact, police detailed the account in reports provided to the defense.

It was a blow in the short-term to the prosecution's double-murder case against Peterson because it looked like a detective intentionally deleted the witness account from his report after realizing it didn't fit with their theory that Peterson killed his pregnant wife.

But it may now work in the prosecution's favor as the trial trudges on into its second month, experts said Friday.



http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/a/2004/06/25/state1643EDT0102.DTL

[juzcuz]

Your link- Loyola/Levenson
"I don't think the prosecution would be as sloppy as everybody thinks they are," Levenson said. "Basically, they can now say that Geragos' big attack was nothing but a whimper and he's trying to trick the jury because he doesn't have anything else."

I agree... He's capitalizing on LE's mistakes because that's all the offense he has. Where's the Purple car, the Brown/tan van, The Time for abduction ...???

[hergus]

"Is it just me, or are the talking heads 1) Mostly pro-defense, and 2) completely out of control?
These people are like a living force that need to be fed constantly.........it's unbelievable!"

You're right on both 1 & 2.....it's like they want ot get gigs via the airways like G did. When they start screaming I mute them....there is no intelligent conversation about the case. Just TH's trying to shout their opinion (defense vs prosecution) over each other. None of them know as much as most of us usually.

Janie Weintraub sure isn't the excellent def att she represents herself to be, it was embarrassing to watch her fumble and make faces on the CTV trial from FL about the eldery men fighting online at the discount movie house that led her client to murder another man. She was awful to watch practice her craft. IMO....

[iconoclast]

I think we need an overhaul of the court system.

Can't argue with that, but I think we also need an overhaul of FOX .... Napolitano's a liberal, ACLU type, a-hole (IMHO).