Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. at War With Beijing, Reports Cite China as No. 1 Threat
newsmax.com ^ | June 17, 2004 | Charles R. Smith

Posted on 06/21/2004 12:55:23 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last
To: Rockitz
The ability to strike all US targets will most certainly give them more confidence that we would not volitionally respond to a Taiwan offensive or be capable of responding should they venture a first strike against us.

Good point. Would we be willing to risk the destruction of a dozen U.S. cities? We're not even willing to risk higher prices!

My, my, what the free traitors have created! I wonder who the Dragon will consume? And will the traitors admit their culpability when the blood of 30,000,000 Taiwanese coats their greedy little hands? Probably not, for it would require a measure of decency.

61 posted on 06/21/2004 6:09:09 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

"Send boarding parties to capture the errant ships... "

Jeez. You're kidding I hope.

"China would last less than 15 without oil imports. "

The Chinese are in a much better position to move to a war/subsistance footing than are Americans.

No Walmart and there will be riots in America.


62 posted on 06/21/2004 6:16:40 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hollywoodghost

You've been reading Clancy, haven't you?


63 posted on 06/21/2004 6:17:47 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; Poohbah
Oh no, he's not kidding. See also his views on trade and the U.S. Government.

Take a look at his post number 89, in an FR thread.

the link is here

64 posted on 06/21/2004 6:20:41 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

"I didn't realize that Taiwan was the only place in the world to get those components."

While I agree with most of what you've said re: China, I do think that on the semiconductor front, we(during the Clinton years) have placed ourselves in a somewhat vunerable position.

When I was a brand new EE, I worked in weapons system design and we were NOT allowed to design in ANY electronic components that were from offshore.

Hell, even Motorola now has most of its semiconductor fabs in China.

I personally think this IS a real threat. One part you can't get can take down a whole weapons system.

Regards,
EEDUDE







65 posted on 06/21/2004 6:20:41 PM PDT by EEDUDE (Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase; hchutch
The Chinese are in a much better position to move to a war/subsistance footing than are Americans.

You must believe that centralized economic planning really works. In reality, without oil, China's ability to distribute food crashes, followed by the ChiCom population. Kindly note that we also would not be exporting food to China in the event of a shooting war.

No Walmart and there will be riots in America.

You sound exactly like the Islamists who believed that destroying the World Trade Center would cause the infidels to surrender.

This is the United States, not France. Perhaps you may riot if there is no Wal-Mart; the rest of us will merely invoke Rule .308 on those foolish enough to riot.

66 posted on 06/21/2004 6:23:04 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Hollywoodghost
Then, they will march on Viet Nam seeking the oil reserves and keep heading south.

As though they haven't tried that a few times over the last thousand years. Maybe the Chinese are hoping one of these days they'll finally get lucky with that country.

67 posted on 06/21/2004 6:25:32 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: neutrino

Yo, girly-man, it's pretty bad form to drag flame wars from thread to thread. Besides, crybaby, you got your way--I'd stay in America, after all, and engage in leaderless resistance against you and your fellow looters.


68 posted on 06/21/2004 6:28:00 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

"the rest of us will merely invoke Rule .308 on those foolish enough to riot."

The reason the Chicomms will be able to deal with their people's deprivation. They have no .308.


69 posted on 06/21/2004 6:28:07 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Then, they will march on Viet Nam seeking the oil reserves and keep heading south.

As though they haven't tried that a few times over the last thousand years. Maybe the Chinese are hoping one of these days they'll finally get lucky with that country.

If that happens, I know some Vietnam vets who will send warm emails to Hanoi.

70 posted on 06/21/2004 6:29:11 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
The reason the Chicomms will be able to deal with their people's deprivation. They have no .308.

You are, of course, presuming that the ChiComs will be able to feed their own troops, or that there will be enough troops.

The PLA will be outnumbered approximately 1,000 to 1 by citizenry looking to eat them.

71 posted on 06/21/2004 6:30:48 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Yo, girly-man, it's pretty bad form to drag flame wars from thread to thread.

Hmm? Just reminding everyone of your words. Which is precisely what I told you I would do.

Besides, crybaby, you got your way--I'd stay in America, after all, and engage in leaderless resistance against you and your fellow looters.

Really? And I suppose that means the Government of the U.S. as well? Please, tell us more!

72 posted on 06/21/2004 6:34:01 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If China gets to 2010 without invading Taiwan, they *WON'T* invade Taiwan.

Its the *NEAR TERM* (the next three or four years) that i'm worried about... the recent oil spike was China starting to compete for the same oil we use. China is going to be very thirsty for oil in the next five years and that is probably what would trigger a war or an adventure...

why Taiwan? perhaps because they (think) they have a legitimate claim on it... will it do them any good? well, it will cause all their naval vessels to become artificial reefs and kill off all their excess male population (although that probably isn't what they had in mind)

73 posted on 06/21/2004 6:35:09 PM PDT by chilepepper (The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Please provide me historical evidence where an unarmed populace overthrew a fully armed dictatorship during a time of war.

Its a matter of conditioning. The chicoms are hardly a generation removed from Mao. They don't have the moral capacity to resist being told what to do.


74 posted on 06/21/2004 6:35:12 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
"It isn't just investors who are making the Chinese army stronger - those who buy Chinese goods at Wal Mart have a portion of the blame also."

'Zactly. You should see the slack jawed, sh*tfaced looks I get when I explain to folks that the proceeds from the sale of goods made in China go directly to the Chinese military-industrial complex. They don't understand that part of the $5 they spent on a shower curtain at the Great Wal-Mart of China could very well go to buy a mortar shell to be dropped in the future on our guys. "But, but, but..." they stammer, "the Chinese are our friends, aren't they? That's what they say on CNN..."

Will our lust for cheap imported toasters, TVs, and shower curtains be our undoing?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

75 posted on 06/21/2004 6:36:19 PM PDT by wku man (Breathe...Relax...Aim...Squeeze...Smile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
The PLA will be outnumbered approximately 1,000 to 1 by citizenry looking to eat them

Really? Like at Tiananmen Square?


76 posted on 06/21/2004 6:37:23 PM PDT by neutrino (Against stupidity the very Gods themselves contend in vain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Please provide me historical evidence where an unarmed populace overthrew a fully armed dictatorship during a time of war.

Russia, 1917 comes to mind.

Perhaps you can explain to me how China is going to be making all of these big strategic waves on the international scene AND have enough troops to keep the lid on at home.

The ENTIRE ChiCom army would be outnumbered 1,000-1 by starving peasants looking to cook Private ChiCom for dinner. (Hey, he's Atkins-friendly).

Note that much of the Army would be deployed to combat zones, leaving that much fewer troops available for domestic-head-busting.

77 posted on 06/21/2004 6:38:53 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
Please, tell us more!

And spoil the surprise for you? No, good sir. You and your ilk will merely have to take your chances with armed citizens seeking to resist tyranny...which is why I won't ever have to bother with the option, because folks like you are too crazy to get elected and too cowardly to risk a coup.

78 posted on 06/21/2004 6:42:40 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: neutrino; hchutch

China needs to import massive quantities of oil as it is, and that situation will only get worse. We control the tap.

And an armored division without fuel is merely an expensive collection of oversized paperweights.


79 posted on 06/21/2004 6:44:43 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Mister Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!" -- President Ronald Reagan, Berlin, 1987)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Perhaps you can explain to me how China is going to be making all of these big strategic waves on the international scene AND have enough troops to keep the lid on at home.

A 100 million man army.

Your entire scenario is based on a starving chinese population. I don't see it.

And what is killing millions of people to Communists?...its nothing, they do it before breakfast.


80 posted on 06/21/2004 6:49:03 PM PDT by Rebelbase ( aka Gassybrowneyedbum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson