Posted on 06/20/2004 10:15:39 PM PDT by farmfriend
ping to Letter from Leslie
He wants input... let's give him some!
He certainly isn't the originator, but the timing is doubtless at his instigation.
In my naievete, I believed there would surely be more FReepers that would care about stopping something that was so danged dumb that even Gray Davis had the good sense to veto it... But Noooooooooo... Because the new Governor wants it for some inexplicable reason... It cannot be challenged by ANYONE!!!
Sad day in the mornin...
Ping
The big government grab is on. The BIG LIE is on. The Left-wing crusade is on.
Where is the average person???
Good question! I'm starting a bill tracking news letter to try to get more information out to the average person. Let me know if you are interested. Pass the word.
If I were in California this would freeze my moles off. I am just glad I don't live there, maybe I have a few more months of normality before it gets here.
Bump - to digest later
Imagine that!
</sarcasm>
The surprise is in who is doing the pushing.
has ahnold decided what land will be set aside for the mandatory exercise with the medicine ball in the giangantic
public square? will you have to wear a mao suit while you
exercise with the medicine ball?
Except for perhaps the REST of the story:
They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b2aa8747413.htm
Time for more phone calls - tell them to vote NO!
------------------------------------------------------------
CURRENT BILL STATUS
MEASURE: A.B. No. 2600
AUTHOR(S): Laird.
TOPIC: Sierra Nevada Conservancy.
HOUSE LOCATION: SEN
+LAST AMENDED DATE: 05/20/2004
TYPE OF BILL: Active
Non-Urgency
Non-Appropriations
Majority Vote Required
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Fiscal
Non-Tax Levy
LAST HIST. ACT. DATE: 06/30/2004
LAST HIST. ACTION: From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR.
Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.).
COMM. LOCATION: SEN APPROPRIATIONS
HEARING DATE: 08/04/2004
TITLE: An act to add Division 23.3 (commencing with Section
33300) to the Public Resources Code, relating to the
Sierra Nevada Conservancy.
Whack-a-mole Bump
Whew!!! Glad that wasn't a Gwakamole Bump!!! (no, I cain't remmemer how ta spell it) LOL (better to laff, than cry, right?)
Here's a snip from one:
Nationalization of Land — A Wake-Up Call
An article in the March 2002 issue of PERC Reports by Matt Ridley, entitled “Controlling the British Countryside,” should serve as a wake-up call for those in the U.S. of A. who might be concerned about the erosion of freedom and private property rights, and the gross nationalization of lands that is pervasive in this great country. It would appear that the citizenry is in a deep sleep or spend too much time at the cabaret.
Mr. Ridley, incidentally, is a well-known British author who is obviously concerned about further liberal invasions in an already socialistic society. Many would say that such intrusive behavior is foreign to America, but they had better reconsider when they hear the sequence of events that produced the current degree of land nationalization in England. The reader will undoubtedly repeatedly say “my gosh, that sounds familiar.”
According to Ridley, the process is not, of course, called nationalization, but rather it usually goes under the name of environmental policy. The effect is to remove, one by one, the property rights of landowners. It proceeds with virtually no interruption. Unfortunately, only a few people, like the author, think it is a bad thing. Obviously, they do not get it, anymore than the bulk of U.S. citizens.
(snip)
WAKE UP Everyone. Speak out now!
life IS full of synergy... :-)
whack-a-mole guac-a-mole.. lol
The last few years the environment has been taking a kicking while limo libs support wackoecoterrorism and lobby politicos to keep everyone out to "preserve" it... some stewardship that is..instead, diseased and improperly managed forest and brush land goes up in flames every year.
This act would keep folks out of the woods or at least for now stop them in their tracks and any development they currently have underway.
By no means is it going to either allow any new lands to be used for commercial or recreational purposes and will shut other such endeavors down... Ha! unless you know someone or are a major player donation-wise...
Did I get any of that right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.