Indictment of Democrats' Hypocrisy on Iraq and terror War Success

Frontpagemagazine ^ | 6/20/04 | David Horowitz

[hermgem]

How do we get the news out?
Just yesterday the N.Y.T. published a reply to Putin's comment that he notified this administration after 9/11 of Hussein plans of attacks on the U.S.
Imagine, Putin a former head of Russia's intelligence services and now President of Russia tells the world that he knew of Hussein's intentions and notified Bush.
This runs contra to all the crafted accusations by the Times that Hussein had no plans to attack the U.S. and therefore Bush invaded Iraq without justification.
And how does the Times counter that one, their main reason to destroy Bush?
By releasing a statement quoting (anonymous) sources at the State Department who claim of not knowing of such a Putin notice after 9/11.
Wow, this must have come from a Democratic wing at State
who now make stand ins for intelligence sources to negate Putin's notification and thereby upholding the Time's crafted accusatory and destructive Bush Attacks.
The former Soviet intelligence chief and current Russian President gets contradicted by anonymous State sources (leakers) providing cover for the N.Y.Times to lend support in upholding a Bush defamation strategy based on recklessly waging a war without any reasons of being threatened by Hussein.

[Tamzee]

Bush needs to go on the offensive.

WE need to go on the offensive.

A great deal of the left's success is based on its brigades of useful idiots that pass these lies around and brainwash new useful idiots from the politically disengaged middle. We need to flood Internet boards with the truth, write thousands of letters a week to local and national newspapers and educate members of our own community.

Our troops are fighting for America overseas... it's time for us to get off our butts and do the same for her here!

[FairOpinion]

"This is the campaign of the Big Lie "

How absolutely true. But fortunately and amazingly, it seems the Dems efforts to perpetrate the Big Lie aren't working.

Americans Disagree With 9/11 Commission on Al Qaeda Iraq Link (69% think there WAS link)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1157076/posts

Many Americans believe al-Qaeda may have worked alongside the regime of Saddam Hussein, according to a poll by Harris Interactive. 69 per cent of respondents believe the deposed Iraqi leader supported the terrorist network, while 22 per cent disagree.

[Theresawithanh]

"American voters are not going to be able to sort out these lies for themselves in the absence of a strong case by the Bush team."

Maybe, but maybe not. Fair Opinion posted results of a poll that says 69% of people polled believe that there was an Iraq-Al Quaida link.

[secretagent]

I like your fighting spirit!

[Theresawithanh]

Here's the link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1157076/posts

[PGalt]

Well stated. Thanks. I've been on offense for 5+ years. It's fun. Minds can be changed. Many hardcore, mainstream propagandized, informationally challenged friends and acquaintences have "seen the light". I find it very rewarding. I know it's great for the future of this country and the world. We are making progress.

[Urbane_Guerilla]

This may be the best thing Horowitz has ever written. It would be really hard to top it for clarity and logic.

One significant aspect: Horowitz sees that W must transcend himself, put behind the absurd politics, and let himself be a war president for the reasons we are at War on Jihad.

[dix]

David is one of our best power hitters. No doubt about him having the left's number.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[section9]

Horowitz forgets something the Common Tator reminded me of once: the only thing that is new in the world is the History you don't know.

CT said that between 1932 and 1940, Republicans hated Roosevelt with an unbridled passion that is akin to the Democratic rhetoric against Bush. You can see this in the hubbub surrounding Michael Moore's film. Anyway, the press was just as much a propaganda tool as it is today, only in those days, it was resolutely Republican and pro-business (as well as anti-Union and anti-New Deal).

The Republicans lost. Sometimes in landslides. Roosevelt was the guy who was fixing the problems. Sometimes the problems weren't fixed. Sometimes the fixes were bogus. But the American people always knew that Mr. Roosevelt was fixing America and, in due time, Winning the War.

The Republicans just sat on the sidelines and bitched.

Nobody votes for people who bitch.

Horowitz is right, but only up to a point. If we started trading charges with Kerry like this, we would have to abandon the high road that got us here. In a mud fight, people will always vote for the cleaner guy. However, staying clean isn't the only thing that gets you across the finish line. Being the guy who is identified as the individual who is trying to fix the problems gets you more than halfway home.

The Dems are bitching and hating this year. W, otoh, is the guy who is fixing the problems.

They will lose. The only question is by how much.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

[GLH3IL]

This is a great piece.

I was at this chat site www.chathouse.com in the Great Hall. Had a running debate with some liberal idiots and was, of course, smoking them with fact that they couldn't challege. Instead of fighting fair...it seems someone got me kicked off of the site....and I'm been blocked from re-registering.....I've been chatting at that site since 1997. Liberals are getting desperate....they are gonna start doing alot of crazy things.

[RottiBiz]

Kudos to David Horowitz!

[stands2reason]

'nother bump