Skip to comments.
A "Cure" for Promiscuity ??
06/19/04
| vanity
Posted on 06/19/2004 7:26:10 AM PDT by genefromjersey
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: genefromjersey
Consider the implications of that for a moment-then consider the implications of doing the same thing to humans !Does Bill Clinton count as human?
2
posted on
06/19/2004 7:30:12 AM PDT
by
Redcoat LI
(You Can Trust Me , I'm Not Like The Others.....)
To: genefromjersey
NOW has no authority to make anything mandatory.
3
posted on
06/19/2004 7:31:15 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
To: genefromjersey
I think this has already been done. God did this a long time ago, but man has followed other directions.
4
posted on
06/19/2004 7:32:55 AM PDT
by
TommyDale
To: genefromjersey
"How long do you think it will take before NOW makes such a gene transplant mandatory for men??"
make it mandatory for women too.
5
posted on
06/19/2004 7:34:25 AM PDT
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: genefromjersey
NOW's reaction is going to depend on whether the therapy works on lesbians.
To: genefromjersey
>Emory University's National Primate Research Center have been doing genetics experiments on meadow voles (whatever they are)
To: Clara Lou
To: genefromjersey
A "Cure" for Promiscuity ??
Lorena Bobbit.
9
posted on
06/19/2004 7:38:00 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: genefromjersey
"How long do you think it will take before NOW makes such a gene transplant mandatory for men??"
NOT SOON ENOUGH. ;)
To: Redcoat LI
Interesting, but with humans I think its a little more complex.Logic alone may tell you not to pass up a free lunch especially when its looks like such a nutritious and tasty free lunch and the special on it may run only for today.
Stupid scientists,what they should really be doing is trying to splice a gene onto a pack rat so it stops collecting trash and shiny metal objects. I'd volunteer my wife for testing on that one. LOL
11
posted on
06/19/2004 7:51:08 AM PDT
by
foto
To: genefromjersey
|
|
How's this for a cure? |
12
posted on
06/19/2004 7:56:29 AM PDT
by
Fintan
(Someday we'll look back on this moment and plow into a parked car.)
To: genefromjersey
NOW (National Organization of Women) has NEVER advocated monogamy. I rather suspect they will shortly demand an expansion of the research so the gene for monogamy can be REMOVED!
Remember, it's hard to tell the difference between a NOW member and your typical neighborhood hooker.
13
posted on
06/19/2004 7:59:05 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: genefromjersey
If monogamy is so good, why doesn't NOW support it already?
14
posted on
06/19/2004 8:01:14 AM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
("This house is sho' gone crazy!")
To: genefromjersey
15
posted on
06/19/2004 8:12:55 AM PDT
by
Servant of the 9
(We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
To: genefromjersey
Oh, MAN!!! The second the 'endangered species' people see that the meadow voles aren't cross-pollinating like they're supposed to, they'll have them on the endangered list.
16
posted on
06/19/2004 8:50:35 AM PDT
by
Maria S
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."George W. Bush 1/20/01)
To: genefromjersey
transferring a single gene - the vasopressin receptor- into the brain of a normally
promiscuous vole will make the critter monogamous.
I wonder if any of the scientists involved will have the cojones to give the gene one
of those cutesy names, like the PW gene.
But probably all the researchers involved are female, gay or of
ambiguous sex-identity.
17
posted on
06/19/2004 8:53:28 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: muawiyah
"Remember, it's hard to tell the difference between a NOW member and your typical neighborhood hooker."
Luckily we don't have all that many hookers in our neighborhood, but if we did, I can't believe they'd be mistaken for NOW gals. The actual gender of some of those 'ladies' is sometimes questionable...appearance-wise.
18
posted on
06/19/2004 8:56:50 AM PDT
by
Maria S
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."George W. Bush 1/20/01)
To: Fintan
To: Servant of the 9
Stepford Husbands! I just watched that movie this week. I don't want a robot, so I think that's going a little too far, but having a husband that's faithful would be nice. So, I think they should give all men this gene. LOL! In all fairness, I suppose there are lots of women who cheat, so I guess women should take the gene too. I don't need it because I would never cheat but I'd take it, if it would give a man peace of mind that I would be faithful.
20
posted on
06/19/2004 9:20:28 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Life is not about how fast you run, or how high you climb, but how well you bounce.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson