Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In a Sprawling Memoir, Clinton Cites Storms and Settles Scores (NYT Spin on Clinton's "My Lies")
New York Times ^ | 06/19/04 | JOHN M. BRODER

Posted on 06/18/2004 8:38:02 PM PDT by conservative in nyc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: conservative in nyc
He said he spent the several days immediately after his confession alternately begging for forgiveness and plotting a retaliatory strike against Mr. bin Laden and Al Qaeda for the August 1998 bombings of United States embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Aides warned him that such a strike might be seen as an effort to change the subject from his personal and legal woes.

Is he trying to claim it was the right wing cabal who allowed bin Laden to escape?

21 posted on 06/18/2004 9:04:29 PM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

Bubba doesn't hold a candle to the greatest writer of the 20th Century.


22 posted on 06/18/2004 9:06:02 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Enablers. This no review, it's a promotional press release. NO perspective, no distance, taking known habitual liar's word for everything. Who ever doubts that Monica was not the only bimbo during those years? And yet the Slimes treats the whole episode as something out of the ordinary. Let's wait for the reviews in the conservative press...


23 posted on 06/18/2004 9:11:37 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
... can't bring myself to read this poisonous swill.

I will not, of course, purchase the book. I already know enough about the great forgotten one.

I am, however, awaiting one left-leaning review which I will get a kick out of reading. He is probably drilling through the self-congratulatory tome as we post.

Guess who?

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.That's right. Christopher Hitchens.

24 posted on 06/18/2004 9:15:50 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Too true. The only thing they have in common is the lengthiness of their books.
25 posted on 06/18/2004 9:16:36 PM PDT by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Amazing!

Nothing is ever his fault.

26 posted on 06/18/2004 9:16:49 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The real tragedy is a man of such political skill and charm might have been able to make something of himself had he not been so poll-dependent. In the end for all his grandiose ambitions he achieved little,

Our current president embodied the potential of a generation -- so many talents, so much charm, such great skill. But in the end, to what end? So much promise to no great purpose.
--- George W. Bush acceptance speech, 8-03-04

27 posted on 06/18/2004 9:20:48 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

this should be about as exciting as Hitler's Mein Kampf


28 posted on 06/18/2004 9:37:02 PM PDT by arly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

In all of the posts of articles about Clinton's book or his 60-Minutes interview, he conveniently omits the fact that his impeachment was not about the sex with Monica, but about LYING UNDER OATH. If any one of us were found guilty of this, we would most certainly be doing time.

Slamming Kenneth Starr and the VWRC for his troubles is a classic Rat tactic.


29 posted on 06/18/2004 9:37:24 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (BUSH/CHENEY 2004!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"he achieved little and was able to finish his term in office only because the American people thought removing him from office for lying about a personal matter was too harsh a punishment for a moment of human weakness. That must be little solace for a man who won't be remembered as one of the presidential "greats" in the history books."

Most of the American people did not fall for that lie. He was impeached because he lied under oath and obstructed justice - plus a few more legal goodies - NOT for lying about his personal life!!!!!

30 posted on 06/18/2004 9:50:54 PM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

"He said the affair was personally humiliating and almost cost him his presidency"

It wasn't the affair Billy, it was lying under oath. You never can bring yourself to admit that, can you?

I remember the contrived photo ops used to really irritate me: All the little minority children gathered around his feet as if he were their benevolent uncle. It seemed like he had one of those at least once a week. Remember Ron Brown's funeral when he was yukking it up with his cronies until he saw the camera was on him, the he went into head-hanging lower-lip-biting mode? Just happening to come across the little pile of stones during his solitary, reflective walk on the beach during the '94 D-Day memorial and then stopping and arranging them into the shape of a cross. Everything about him reeked of the fallacious.


31 posted on 06/18/2004 9:52:03 PM PDT by dandi ("No nation ever taxed it's way into prosperity." - R.L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
They cannot be serious. Have they no decency?

The vaunted New York Times falls for the sleeping on the couch lie. We are being treated to what we had to endure during the years this thing held office: He states obvious lies and the media can't be bothered to insert even a hint of a qualifier indicating they have any doubt their Bill is telling anything but the truth.

As to this:

But he devotes only a sentence to the harrowing moments when he sent a Navy carrier near the Taiwan strait to stop China from missile tests meant to intimidate the island's voters before a crucial election.

Could it be he didn't want to dwell on the area where his activities are really suspect?

'Dear Charlie'

At the request of several Opinion, Inc. readers, we offer the complete text of the letters between Charlie Trie, fugitive Clinton fundraiser, and President Clinton about U.S. fleet movements in response to military pressure aimed at democratic Taiwan by the Chinese communist military.

The nature, text, and context of these letters have been virtually ignored by the Big Media.

The following letter to President Clinton from Charlie Trie was faxed by former White House aide Mark Middleton to the Oval Office on March 21, 1996 with a handwritten cover notation reminding the White House that "Charlie Trie is a personal friend of the President from LR (Little Rock). He is also a major supporter. The President sat beside Charlie at the big Asian fundraiser several weeks ago." Hours before this letter was faxed, Trie hand-delivered $460,000 in checks to the Clinton's legal defense trust fund. All these checks, plus an additional $122,000 in additional Trie-directed donations, were returned three months later because of evidence that they were forged and funneled to Clinton's slush fund by a Taiwan-based Buddhist cult.

~snip~

32 posted on 06/18/2004 10:12:10 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Is it just me, or does everyone else find this "sleeping on the couch" business a bit much?

It's been getting commented about here as well as our noticing the fatuous media reporting it with a straight face, just as they always do with "him".

Brit Hume will probably wryly mention it with the appropriate cocked eyebrow and droll tone indicating he knows there's a big fat lie sitting there.

33 posted on 06/18/2004 10:15:02 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LADY J

I do agree with you. But the truth remains the American people didn't want to see another President forced out of office. People did come to agree with the Democrats it was about sex and they thought impeachment was overkill. And didn't help Republicans that Starr's report seemed to focus more on Clinton's lurid sexual exploits than on his abuse of power.


34 posted on 06/18/2004 10:17:39 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Mr. Clinton has surprisingly little to say about his opponent in the 1996 election, Bob Dole

Bob Dole was one of the best things that ever happened to clinton.

35 posted on 06/18/2004 10:23:00 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Thanks for highlighting this, I was going to remark on this amazing line of clintonian logic:

He explained the sudden appearance of Mrs. Clinton's legal billing records in the White House residence as the product merely of sloppy record-keeping in Arkansas.

And again, the New York Times doesn't blink an eye. Why that sloppy record-keeping transported those records by invisible transponder waves and they landed smack dab in the living quarters of the WH. I'm glad that's cleared up!

36 posted on 06/18/2004 10:23:11 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: fso301

With a better candidate, its possible Bubba might have been beaten. But no, Bob Dole had to insist it was his turn. To most Republicans, he was a representative of a time when the party's ideology could be summed up in getting along with the New Deal. And Clinton's appeal was he was gun shy and wouldn't rock the boat. The rest as they say, was history.


37 posted on 06/18/2004 10:27:08 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
But Dan Rather said that, as a presidential memoir, it's second only to Grant.

I saw Danny said that, too. Five stars out of five for a presidential memoir, said Dan.

Do ALL the presidential memoirs talk about their first "sexual stirrings"?

He describes his youth as "a fat band boy" and recalls that in junior high school, as he began to learn more about his mind and body, some of it scared him, including his first sexual stirrings

It does not strike me as presidential in the least.

38 posted on 06/18/2004 10:30:04 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
"Todd S. Purdom, who contributed to this, is married to Dee Dee Myers."

Makes me wonder if Dee Dee was helping Todd pen this review, while they lounged on the bed, laptop at er...hand:

The book pulses with Mr. Clinton's own voice and is bursting with a typical profusion of anecdote and detail...

Instead of "profusion", I would have used "proSPEWtion".
39 posted on 06/18/2004 10:59:41 PM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
...and his acquittal on impeachment charges in the Senate....

I thought he was not removed from office. I don't think that's an acquittal. Remember, doesn't rise to the level of blah blah blah.
40 posted on 06/18/2004 11:06:52 PM PDT by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson