Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rewrite the Second Amendment?
Magic City Morning Star ^ | Jun 2, 2004 | Richard D. Skidmore

Posted on 06/02/2004 12:44:36 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-488 next last
To: RKV

The Incorperation Myth is one that has caused us a lot of damage over the years. That is all it is as well, a MYTH. It has no basis beyond what liberal activist judges have dreamed up.


61 posted on 06/02/2004 2:30:15 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
The Incorperation Myth is one that has caused us a lot of damage over the years. That is all it is as well, a MYTH. It has no basis beyond what liberal activist judges have dreamed up.

Agreed. They certainly have no limitations in weilding the "supremacy clause" when they want to. This incorporation crap is nothing but a rubric to enforce a "glass is half empty" interpretation.

62 posted on 06/02/2004 2:41:43 PM PDT by Woahhs (America is an idea, not an address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

The state law is very much affected by the second amendmant. It is not like the first amendment which says "Congress shall make no law..." It says "...shall not be infringed". It doesnt say who shall not infringe. It says shall not be infringed which means nobody can infringe it.


63 posted on 06/02/2004 2:41:47 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs

Exactly. This is the same mechanism they are using to expand the so-called "commerce clause" to mena anything that happens anywhere. Even if it is only inside ONE State, or even over seas.


64 posted on 06/02/2004 2:44:20 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

The regulating commerce clause does NOT trump everything else. It would be an infringement. The 2nd says "...Shall Not Be Infringed. It is the only universal application amendment. It does not specify which agency or government shall not infringe. There shall be no talking means something different in a group from "There shall be no talking by short people."


65 posted on 06/02/2004 2:47:31 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RKV

The wording of the 2nd amendment is such that it needs no other amendment for it to be applicable in every jurisdiction in the United States.


66 posted on 06/02/2004 2:50:04 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Why have we never sought to limit "judicial review?" It's not like it's codified in the Constitution, and there's nothing in that same Constitution that gives ANY branch of government a "magic wand" such as the court has given itself.


67 posted on 06/02/2004 2:50:32 PM PDT by Woahhs (America is an idea, not an address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs

All I ask for is a strict scrutiny test with respect to the 2nd Amendment. The governmental purpose, objective, or interest must be "compelling." The means to achieve the purpose, objective, or interest must be "narrowly tailored" to the accomplishment of the governmental purpose, objective, or interest. Under this standard, almost no federal or state gun laws measure up. You could lose your rights only as a result of due process (e.g. conviction for a violent felony).


68 posted on 06/02/2004 2:51:22 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

The 2nd amendmendmant is absolute. It does not say Congress Shall make no law...". It says"...shall not be infringed." That means by everybody, even California.


69 posted on 06/02/2004 2:51:52 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Exactly. This is the same mechanism they are using to expand the so-called "commerce clause" to mena anything that happens anywhere. Even if it is only inside ONE State, or even over seas.

Seen it. "Strict Constructionist" Supremacy Clause arguments in support of "Living Document" New Deal Commerce Clause legislation. It's quite a dance.

70 posted on 06/02/2004 2:53:11 PM PDT by tacticalogic (I Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

For my part, I agree with you completely, however, it is the judges and legislators who have proven that they need clarification.


71 posted on 06/02/2004 2:53:20 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Few of the federal judges in the PRK would agree with you - more is the pity.


72 posted on 06/02/2004 2:54:10 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

WRONG. The 2nd needs NO "incorporation". The wording is universal, unlike the others. It does not forbid Congress or any other unit from an action. It just flat forbids it."Shall not be infringed." Nobody can do it.


73 posted on 06/02/2004 2:54:45 PM PDT by arthurus (Better to fight them over THERE than over HERE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Seen it. "Strict Constructionist" Supremacy Clause arguments in support of "Living Document" New Deal Commerce Clause legislation. It's quite a dance.

You'd think they would avoid setting the stage such that we have to kill them to redress a grievence against rulings they KNOW are disingenuous.

74 posted on 06/02/2004 2:58:12 PM PDT by Woahhs (America is an idea, not an address)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
The regulating commerce clause does NOT trump everything else.

All we have to do is convince everyone who supported, voted for, or signed the AWB of that.

75 posted on 06/02/2004 2:59:20 PM PDT by tacticalogic (I Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

Thanks for the clarification.


76 posted on 06/02/2004 3:09:53 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any time. ;-)


77 posted on 06/02/2004 3:13:51 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Any attempt to rewrite the 2nd Amendment is cause to USE the 2nd Amendment.

Limosine liberals and judicial activists had damn well better know this fact.


78 posted on 06/02/2004 3:25:44 PM PDT by spodefly (This post meets the minimum daily requirements for cynicism and irony.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The Ninth Circus uses magical thinking.

There are problably more threads on FR defending 9thCC decisions than criticizing them.

79 posted on 06/02/2004 3:28:47 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

I like the line - "Any attempt to rewrite the 2nd Amendment is cause to USE the 2nd Amendment." I don't think it is going to be that simple. We already are pretty far down the line toward confiscation. It happened when the NFA was enacted in the 1930s. Downhill ever since. We are going to have to work for it. CC laws are changing and that is a good start. Kill the AWB next. On to bigger things after that. For my part, I would like to see the re-introduction of local militias. I don't mean a bunch of liquored up yahoos. I do mean something along the Swiss model - every man a soldier.


80 posted on 06/02/2004 3:32:33 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-488 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson