Skip to comments.
Ban on Partial Birth Abortion Overturned
Fox News Alert
Posted on 06/01/2004 10:34:28 AM PDT by RWR8189
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-400 next last
1
posted on
06/01/2004 10:34:28 AM PDT
by
RWR8189
To: RWR8189
Will Earl Anthony's PBA titles be stripped?
To: RWR8189
To: RWR8189
Good. Now I won't have to worry about those annoying bowling shows on TV anymore.
4
posted on
06/01/2004 10:35:43 AM PDT
by
RonF
To: RWR8189
Sorry - brain fart (old folks disease) here - what's a PBA??
5
posted on
06/01/2004 10:36:01 AM PDT
by
steplock
(http://www.gohotsprings.com)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
To: Numbers Guy
Will Earl Anthony's PBA titles be stripped?LOL. And so quick.
7
posted on
06/01/2004 10:36:14 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(And I never see the IDF 'til it's way too late! Now I'm dyin' in the Gaza Strip in the blazin' sun.)
To: RWR8189
A ban on Police Benevolent Associations?
8
posted on
06/01/2004 10:36:14 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: RWR8189
PBA = Partial Birth Abortion???
There is no democratic republic anymore apparently....
9
posted on
06/01/2004 10:36:54 AM PDT
by
IFly4Him
To: RWR8189
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/01/national/01CND-ABOR.html
Ban on Type of Abortion Is Declared Unconstitutional
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 1, 2004
AN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge Tuesday declared unconstitutional the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, saying the measure infringes on a woman's right to choose.
U.S. District Judge Phyllis Hamilton's ruling came in one of three lawsuits challenging the legislation President Bush signed last year.
Advertisement
The ruling applies to Planned Parenthood clinics and their doctors, who perform roughly half the nation's abortions.
"The act poses an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion," Hamilton wrote.
Federal judges in New York and Nebraska also heard challenges to the law earlier this year but have yet to rule.
To: mewzilla
"How Have We Become a Nation of Dumbies?"
11
posted on
06/01/2004 10:36:58 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(And I never see the IDF 'til it's way too late! Now I'm dyin' in the Gaza Strip in the blazin' sun.)
To: RWR8189
12
posted on
06/01/2004 10:37:10 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: RWR8189
Which abusive federal court - Kalifornia's or New York's?
13
posted on
06/01/2004 10:37:24 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(When does it cease to be Freedom of the Press, and become outright sedition???)
To: Petronski
Too many acronyms for me to keep up with. So sorry.
14
posted on
06/01/2004 10:37:56 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Coleus
15
posted on
06/01/2004 10:38:41 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
(Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
To: alancarp
Okay, that figures - Sodom Francisco
16
posted on
06/01/2004 10:38:43 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(When does it cease to be Freedom of the Press, and become outright sedition???)
To: Sub-Driver
"The act poses an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion," Hamilton wrote. Why do the unborn have no rights? Are so many women in this country SO STUPID as to NOT know what actions result in pregnancy???
17
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:01 AM PDT
by
xrp
To: Sub-Driver
U.S. District Judge Phyllis HamiltonI am sure that she meets the Democratic seal of "being in the mainstream". Not even looking, I will bet she is a Toon appointee.
18
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:17 AM PDT
by
Corporate Law
(<>< -- Xavier Basketball - Perennial Slayer of #1 Ranked Teams)
To: Sub-Driver
woman's right to choose. Were in the Constitution is that? I can't find it!
To: RWR8189
20
posted on
06/01/2004 10:39:20 AM PDT
by
ECM
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-400 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson