Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Crew Gathering Examines 1967 Israeli Attack of USS Liberty
Associated Press ^ | May 22, 2004 | Jean Ortiz Associated Press Writer

Posted on 05/22/2004 6:14:25 AM PDT by OutSpot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Let the truth set you free.
1 posted on 05/22/2004 6:14:27 AM PDT by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OutSpot
Here we go. Again.


2 posted on 05/22/2004 6:21:37 AM PDT by rdb3 ($710.96... The price of freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

I still don't understand if this was deliberate, what point would it have served to attack the only country in the free world that keeps them alive? Not saying it wasn't deliberate, but what would be the reason for it...unless maybe the Liberty was providing Intel to the Arabs somehow.


3 posted on 05/22/2004 6:22:36 AM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; suekas; DeuceTraveler; BigSkyFreeper; luvbach1; wardaddy

Ping


4 posted on 05/22/2004 6:24:13 AM PDT by OutSpot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
I don't know, but I think that maybe they wanted to sink US ship and then say that Arabs have done it. USA would have attacked Arabs.
5 posted on 05/22/2004 6:29:10 AM PDT by Grzegorz 246
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot
"Let the truth set you free."

Don't hold your breath for the truth on this in our life time.

Even if we buy the lie that Israel did not know it was a USA ship, how do they explain the shooting of men in the life rafts? Regardless of what side of a conflict a person is on, shooting at life rafts is not permitted under civilized rules of war. (sort of an oxymoron isn't it)

The US government is just a guilty of a cover up and lies as Israel.

There must (I hope) come a time in everyones life when they stop believing the fairy tales that any government is there to protect you. It is about power and power only. Does not matter if it is left, right, center, the citizens are simply to be ruled.

6 posted on 05/22/2004 6:29:48 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (I have the biggest organ in my town {;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

"Let the truth set you free."


Someday soon "truth" will indeed set us all free.


7 posted on 05/22/2004 6:35:01 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

http://home.cfl.rr.com/gidusko/liberty/

USS LIBERTY Memorial

http://www.ussliberty.org/

Thirty-four men died and 172 were wounded.


The history of the race, and each individual's experience,
are thick with evidence that a truth is not hard to kill
and that a lie told well is immortal.


Mark Twain


8 posted on 05/22/2004 6:36:20 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT (Sane, and have the papers to prove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grzegorz 246

I thought that the "Arab Airforce" was pretty much destroyed, but so far, yours is the best plausible theory I've heard.


9 posted on 05/22/2004 6:43:48 AM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

Were the "reparations" for this atrocity paid by Israel out of US taxpayer aid funds?


10 posted on 05/22/2004 7:03:55 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

Right On!!I think Mr.Shafer's conclusion is reasonable.


11 posted on 05/22/2004 7:36:05 AM PDT by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot
The Attack on the USS Liberty Was A Mistake
12 posted on 05/22/2004 7:44:56 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

I believe Senator John McCain's Naval Officer father was involved in the coverup of that incident -- not sure at what level.


13 posted on 05/22/2004 8:02:18 AM PDT by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"Let the truth set you free."

Someday soon "truth" will indeed set us all free.

And since the post is not the truth CIA: USS "Liberty" hit was unintentional, then is the above post intended to enslave?

14 posted on 05/22/2004 8:45:29 AM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

All is not as it seems with the Liberty, but this is one hot putton you cannot push on Free Republic. On this subject FR is neither Free nor a Republic. Post at your own risk!


15 posted on 05/22/2004 8:55:11 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

The attack on the Liberty was to protect Israel's agents in the Pentagon (early day Michael Pollards). The Liberty was moving into a position to verify that Israel was acting on information they could only have gotten from undercover agents in the Pentagon.


16 posted on 05/22/2004 8:57:32 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bommer

I believe that Israel took a calculated risk and intentionally made multiple light attacks on the Liberty, which was in a very inconvenient place for them. They believed that they were fighting for the life of their nation which justified taking such risks. The gamble paid off, and we will never know if it was really necessary. My understanding is that Israel was afraid the US would step in and force them to stop if they had prior knowledge of what was going to happen. In the same circumstances I might well have made the same decision in their place. Extreme circumstances call for extreme measures. The Arab armies were massing for an attack to push Isreal into the sea.

What I found most disturbing was the recall of USN aircraft which had been scrambled to protect them. In all of the reports, that was never adequately explained. When your own side calls repeatedly for help, you don't call your planes home.


17 posted on 05/22/2004 9:02:35 AM PDT by Starwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot

Bttt


18 posted on 05/22/2004 9:06:09 AM PDT by DoctorMichael (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OutSpot; All

http://www.nsa.gov/liberty/index.cfm


19 posted on 05/22/2004 9:30:26 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf
My understanding is that Israel was afraid the US would step in and force them to stop if they had prior knowledge of what was going to happen. In the same circumstances I might well have made the same decision in their place. Extreme circumstances call for extreme measures. The Arab armies were massing for an attack to push Isreal into the sea.

That would suggest the attack to place before the war- the attack occured on june 8- on june 5 the IAF destroyed virtually the entire Egyptian airforce- by june 7, they'd swept through the sinai and destroyed the Egyptian formations stationed there.

I'm agnostic, leaning toward "accident" in my interpretation- but I don't think whatever it was had anything to do with hiding war preparations- the war had already begun, and was well in hand.

20 posted on 05/22/2004 2:38:31 PM PDT by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson