Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Legalize Incest' Suggestion Shocks Lawmakers
Crosswalk ^ | May 21st, 2004 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 05/21/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT by missyme

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2004 4:18:01 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: missyme; Torie; AntiGuv; Sabertooth
Perfectly consistent with Justice Kennedys majority ruling in Lawrence v Texas.

Polygamy, polyamory, incest, marriage of convenience? No way?

LOL.

2 posted on 05/21/2004 4:21:12 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme
SANTORUM WAS/IS RIGHT
--summing up how well Santorum fortold the future with a bumpersticker slogan
3 posted on 05/21/2004 4:22:12 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Right to privacy. Right to do what you want with your own body. Why not?


4 posted on 05/21/2004 4:22:34 PM PDT by gitmo (Thanks, Mel. I needed that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Up next on today's Oprah: Bestiality, and what breeds are the best to mate with...


5 posted on 05/21/2004 4:22:53 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Extremer than any Extremist!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Right to privacy. Right to do what you want with your own body.

Right to murder your baby on the way out? Why not indeed.

6 posted on 05/21/2004 4:24:44 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Anybody remember the "Flowers in the Attic" series?

(ick)


7 posted on 05/21/2004 4:25:28 PM PDT by cyncooper (There's a RAT line in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

You laugh now. But the truth is that legally after Lawrence vs. Texas Pandora's box is now open.


8 posted on 05/21/2004 4:26:46 PM PDT by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: missyme

Oh, PERFECT. That didn't take long, did it?


9 posted on 05/21/2004 4:28:22 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (JUST SAY NO TO SIMS' CITY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

"Wa'll shucks...hepn's alla tyme up he'ya."
"My muthr wuz tellin' me just 'tuther day hows her and Unc'le Enius had a "special" party ..just them two, after ev'ry body went on home on her 12th birthday."
"I allay's a wundered how a'come brother Elmer looks alot like Unc'le Enius."
"Sissie-Mae's 12th a'comin next week and boy have I got a present for her!"

Does this MORON (the "Professer" mentioned in the article) even have a branch in his own family tree? There are VERY good reasons for preventing insest. Both genetic and Biblical.


10 posted on 05/21/2004 4:38:21 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Response times: My 12 gauge - 30 seconds / my .45 - 4 seconds/ Local police - ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Oh NO, after Massachusettes we have anything goes when it comes to sexual relationships, I have heard Man with animals, sodomizing horses, marrying more than 1 person and now marry your family members, I am sure pedophiles will want in on the action next....


11 posted on 05/21/2004 4:39:39 PM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

You are correct, my friend. It seems to me that the MA state constitution does not SPECIFICALLY prohibit incest. That is how those MA supreme court judges foisted gay marriage on that state. I can see incest as the next taboo to fall in MA.


12 posted on 05/21/2004 4:40:05 PM PDT by Conservative Infidel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: missyme

And they said this wasn't possible.


13 posted on 05/21/2004 4:41:20 PM PDT by BriarBey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel

Ping


14 posted on 05/21/2004 4:46:07 PM PDT by null and void (The owls are not what they seem...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Infidel
You can also expect polygamy as well.

Following the same doctrine, why is marriage limited to two individuals?

Group marriage? Polygamy? Polygyny?

15 posted on 05/21/2004 4:51:30 PM PDT by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: missyme
Humor break:

Oedipus: [walking around blind, collecting donations] Give to Oedipus! Give to Oedipus! [Becomes aware of Josephus and greets him]
Oedipus: Hey, Josephus!
Josephus: Hey, m*****f*****!

16 posted on 05/21/2004 4:53:02 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Perfectly consistent with Justice Kennedys majority ruling in Lawrence v Texas. Polygamy, polyamory, incest, marriage of convenience? No way? LOL.

So, can we marry our brothers and our sisters at the same time.........as long as we are all consenting adults?

17 posted on 05/21/2004 4:54:48 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cavtrooper21
There are VERY good reasons for preventing insest. Both genetic and Biblical.

Good biblical reasons. It's not as clean cut on genetic grounds.

What incest will do is to bring out recessive genes. These genes can be either bad or good, depending upon the particular allele.

18 posted on 05/21/2004 5:00:19 PM PDT by curmudgeonII (Time wounds all heels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: missyme

No doubt Princeton University will soon be hiring this guy to work alongside Professor Singer, their high-paid advocate of bestiality and infanticide.


19 posted on 05/21/2004 5:02:27 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII

"...or good"
Not "or", but try instead "bad and good". I realize that with the technology avalible in the next few years we may be able to "weed out" some of the bad recessives, it still strikes me as a good idea to do our best to prevent incest/inbreeding in humans.
Remember the last bunch that went for "selective trait breeding"??? They walked really close to the inbreeding line in their attempt to create the "Master Race".
On the other end of the spectrum is the unrestricted and random inbreeding that has/does occured in isolated populations or in populations with little moral/sexual restraint.
That rarely brings out anything but bad.


20 posted on 05/21/2004 5:14:15 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 (Response times: My 12 gauge - 30 seconds / my .45 - 4 seconds/ Local police - ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson