Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arctic Temperatures Warming Rapidly - Polar Explorer
Yahoo! News ^ | 5/17/04 | David Ljunggren - Reuters

Posted on 05/17/2004 11:54:12 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: CWOJackson

well....
it's gone to Mars.
That's it.
Mars has our water.


121 posted on 05/17/2004 7:47:55 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I wonder if there is any data on temperatures on Mars or Venus? If they have also increased proportionately the same as the Earth... could it be something other than the methane from a cows butt?
122 posted on 05/17/2004 7:50:36 PM PDT by Porterville (Kerry has no gravitas!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Sun's Output Increasing in Possible Trend Fueling Global Warming By Robert Roy Britt Senior Science Writer posted: 02:30 pm ET 20 March 2003

article

123 posted on 05/17/2004 7:53:47 PM PDT by Porterville (Kerry has no gravitas!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The ozone hole over Antartica is largest during the Antartic Spring due to the polar vortex and certain clouds which form - causing ozone to decrease. Similar things happen in the Artic but not to as great of an extent except for certain times in the past due to unusual weather, mostly....at any rate, the main concern with the Artic region at the present time is that the 'hole' will 'move' and affect other, populated areas - so it is definitely something people should keep tabs on.
124 posted on 05/17/2004 7:55:56 PM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville

The space aliens are using chlorine as a fuel and dumping it in the stratosphere, perhaps?


125 posted on 05/17/2004 7:58:34 PM PDT by Born in a Rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I just did some search and calcs. If the arctic, antarctic and Greenland melted completely the Earth's water surface would raise about 250 feet. Hardly Waterworld.

126 posted on 05/17/2004 8:39:11 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Of course, it's a dry heat.

So's an oven.

127 posted on 05/17/2004 8:51:39 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell

The consequences of such melting are not easy to predict. Sometimes the eke-freaks seem to think that the whole world will become desert. This ignores evaporation; if more water is available at a warmer temperature, there will be more evaporation.

There are lots of possibilities: general warming with desert equator, tropical mid-latitudes and temperate poles is popular but probably not likely. More evaporation could lead more snowfall so we could have rainforest tropics and ice covered poles with no temperate zones. Too much evaporation could trigger widespread glaciation; lots of snow in Winnepeg; no melt during summer; even more snow the next year as the previous snow would reflect sunlight.

More clouds could reflect sun or hold in heat; can't really predict.

About the only prediction I would make is that changes will occure quickly (1-5 years) rather than slowly (100 years.)


128 posted on 05/17/2004 9:01:46 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What is not being reported is where the temperatures are a lot lower than normal. They only concentrate on the hot spots.


129 posted on 05/17/2004 9:04:50 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Take my advise, I'm not using it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
I just did some search and calcs. If the arctic, antarctic and Greenland melted completely the Earth's water surface would raise about 250 feet. Hardly Waterworld.

LOL! Tell that to all the *major* population centers that dot our coastlines....

130 posted on 05/17/2004 9:07:48 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
LOL! Tell that to all the *major* population centers that dot our coastlines....

You mean the blue areas on the political map?

131 posted on 05/17/2004 9:42:19 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
What is not being reported is where the temperatures are a lot lower than normal. They only concentrate on the hot spots.

Good point. The earth gets X amount of heat from the sun each year. Some years it gets X+y, some X-y. There's nothing constant about the sun's output nor our orbit around it.

How this heat is dispersed is interesting in that some years it may impact the northern hemisphere more than the southern and vise versa.

Sled-boy may just be out of sync with these perterbations. As to the lack of Polar bears: just what might a PB pelt be worth in a newly capitalized, formerly socialized society?

132 posted on 05/17/2004 9:47:09 PM PDT by budwiesest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest

The climate guys mostly look at global averages though. They average over (what little data they get) the globe then look for trend lines over time. Individual locations contribute only to the average. The point is to try to see how much net energy is being accumulated (or lost) over some years.


133 posted on 05/17/2004 10:03:20 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
LOL! Tell that to all the *major* population centers that dot our coastlines....

You mean the blue areas on the political map?

Well, uh yeah. Hehehe.

134 posted on 05/17/2004 10:12:53 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: alaskanfan
There's only a small patch of ice left in the backyard.

If summer falls on a weekend, maybe we can have a barbeque!!!

135 posted on 05/17/2004 10:17:39 PM PDT by alaskanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Want to rethink that! It's a matter of weight not volume.


136 posted on 05/17/2004 10:59:43 PM PDT by rock58seg (Character and integrity do count. BUSH/CHENEY 04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
"So where does the yellow go?"

Ummm.........you really don't want to know..........

137 posted on 05/18/2004 7:14:51 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: budwiesest
      Some years it gets X+y, some X-y. There's nothing constant about the sun's output nor our orbit around it.

Yes, and whenever it goes X+y, it may do so for a hundred years in a row
138 posted on 05/19/2004 8:21:06 PM PDT by Cheeeeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
I just did some search and calcs. If the arctic, antarctic and Greenland melted completely the Earth's water surface would raise about 250 feet. Hardly Waterworld.

Why would you count the ice floating in the arctic?
If a large chunk of ice floating in a glass of water melts, does the water level rise?

The ice had already sunk into the water to the point where the weight of the water displaced equalled the total weight of the ice.
139 posted on 05/19/2004 8:28:48 PM PDT by Cheeeeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Cheeeeze
I just listed the arctic becaue it is always included in the global warming fright list. Melting Greenland would account for 39 feet and Anarctic, 210 feet.

140 posted on 05/19/2004 8:39:49 PM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson