Skip to comments.
Blix: Sarin gas used in Iraq attack not likely sign of WMDs... (Drudge)
Drudge Report
| 5/17/04
| Drudge
Posted on 05/17/2004 11:12:42 AM PDT by The South Texan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 last
To: Dianna
Hmmm, where's the story now, can't even find mention of it, oh wait, Rumsfeld did say it might not have even been Sarin gas, oh well, the truth travels slow doesn't it, who was on the better side of judgement, the over-reactors or dear ol' Scythian?
To: Scythian
Hmmm, where's the story now, can't even find mention of it, oh wait, Rumsfeld did say it might not have even been Sarin gas, oh well, the truth travels slow doesn't it, who was on the better side of judgement, the over-reactors or dear ol' Scythian? I believe the sarin was confirmed today, was it not?
142
posted on
05/19/2004 10:01:37 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: jpsb
Yes, he or she is sure. This is a binary weapon that maintains two relatively harmless chemicals in a separate state that only create Sarin when they are mixed. that is, in fact, how most chemical weapons are built so they are less dangerous to store in a stockpile.
143
posted on
05/27/2004 8:06:35 PM PDT
by
Texagun
(Nothing changes if nothing changes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-143 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson