Pentagon: Hersh report 'journalist malpractice'

CNN ^ | May 17, 2004 | CNN Staff

[tvn]

Pentagon official flatly denies existence of secret interrogation squad. Time to hear from Hersh's "fewer than half dozen sources...but more than two."

[okie01]

Time to hear from Hersh's "fewer than half dozen sources...but more than two."

Meaning that Hersh has 3, 4 or 5 sources making stuff up.

Or that he's making up 3, 4 or 5 sources...

[dirtboy]

Hersh, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his story on the My Lai massacre in Vietnam, said he had fewer than half a dozen sources for his report but more than two

Three, to be exact. His head. His a**. And his dog.

[Shermy]

to hear from Hersh's "fewer than half dozen sources

Here's a guess...Alan Foley, Mr. & Mrs. Wilson, ____________

[ken5050]

or, perhaps that Hershwas set up..(G).he was fed this by someone who knew he'd jump on it like a starving dog on a bone, without checking..

[Wild Irish Rogue]

" more than two.

David Hack
David Worth

[Oldsailor]

I wonder if Sy Hersh will site his sources and show us all how credible they are especially in view of the overwhelming number of news people who doubt the existence of WMD

[r9etb]

he was fed this by someone who knew he'd jump on it like a starving dog on a bone, without checking..

You mean, perhaps by somebody in the Senate who'd somehow received a copy of the report before Rumsfeld...?

[I'm ALL Right!]

Hersh's sources could be named "me, myself and I". That's more than 2 and less than 6.

[Wolfstar]

This is the most hysterical piece of journalist malpractice I have ever observed..."

The deeply unfortnately thing is that, unlike all other organizations in the country, only media organizations are all but totally immune from civil or criminal legal proceedings thanks to the overly generous interpretation by the courts of the First Amendment's freedom-of-the-press clause.

[etcetera]

Seymore Hersch = Seymore Butts

[Eric in the Ozarks]

What was Hersh writing about during the 8 years of the Clintons ?

[T'wit]

The only people who can be surprised that Hersh is pitching manure again are those who haven't seen him pitch it before.

[ravingnutter]

quotes a former intelligence official

And a FORMER official would be in the loop how? < sarcasm> "Former official" also implies a Clintonite, now there's areal good reliable source for ya, they would never stoop to lying, all the while putting our troops at risk, just to win an election !< /sarcasm>

[Zack Nguyen]

Hersch actually wrote an incredibly critical book about John F. Kennedy, if you can believe it. Called The Dark Side of Camelot. Contained a lot of new information. What if this story were true? The Sec Def wants special attention given to a group of prisoners. Information is needed. The soldiers respond by putting underwear on the prisoner's heads and walking them about naked. Does that make any sense? Do people actually think that Rumsfeld got on the phone and barked, "I want underwear on some heads before sundown, or I'll bump ya back down to private!" Even if it were true that they asked for "special attention" to be given, it hardly seems likely that Rumsfeld dictated the embarrassing coercion used.

[blackbag]

"set up"

You could be right ...Seymour Hersh, has published a large number of credible investgations over many years and I trust his writing more then most. Usually his sources in Mil and Intel are excellent. I doubt he has an agenda to politically slam Bush..

So in my mind either this story has some inkling of truth or he was setup royal....

[ken5050]

I believe you and I have different spins on the term "set up"..

[Ben Hecks]

"Here's a guess...Alan Foley, Mr. & Mrs. Wilson, ____________"

May I add Walter Pincus to your list?

[Edit35]

Meaning that Hersh has 3, 4 or 5 sources making stuff up ...

Hmmmm. Hersh claims to have current and past intelligence sources.

I bet two months pay that one of these so-called sources is Joe Wilson's wife, you know, the Clinton flacky who screamed bloody murder when Novak confirmed (everybody already knew) that she was in the CIA.

I am quite sure she would say ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to tarnish President Bush and Sec.Def Rumsfield, no matter how libelous or how much she had to make up.

Hersh will never reveal his source, so she is safe.

So that takes care of Hersh's "current intelligence source". As for the "past govt source," that could be any one of a thousand Clintonoids, every one of whom would make up phony claims about Sec. Rumsfield or President Bush in a Clinton-orgasmic minute.

[Edit35]

You could be right ...Seymour Hersh, has published a large number of credible investgations over many years

You mean "incredible", do you not?