Skip to comments.
Beijing Threatens Taipei With Destruction
World Net Daily ^
| 5/17/04
| Staff
Posted on 05/17/2004 5:01:42 AM PDT by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
When it rains, it pours.
1
posted on
05/17/2004 5:01:42 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
To: kattracks; Alamo-Girl; buffyt; Travis McGee; Jeff Head; maui_hawaii; ALOHA RONNIE
2
posted on
05/17/2004 5:02:37 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(From the State Looking FORWARD to Global Warming!!)
To: Paul Ross; StriperSniper; Mo1; Peach; Howlin; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
"Chinese people will crush their schemes firmly and thoroughly at any cost." Yeah, Thems fightin' words.
3
posted on
05/17/2004 5:05:27 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: Paul Ross
US should threaten Beijing right back for even suggesting such a thing.
4
posted on
05/17/2004 5:05:30 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
To: Crazieman
We've got our hands full right now with Iraq. Let the mighy United Nations handle this one. I'm sure France and Spain will send troops immediately. Even though I am a die-hard conservative, I'm getting a little tire of being the guardian of the gate for the entire world.
What's wrong with those stupid Chinese. Good grief, they have a billion people they can't even take care of now. Well, at least if they do attack Taiwan, maybe that'll get the Iraqi Prisoner Scandal off of the lead story on every news network in the world.
5
posted on
05/17/2004 5:11:49 AM PDT
by
no dems
(Does the Bush/Cheney camp monitor the Freep website?)
To: no dems
They'll still blame it on us.
Either we somehow appeared to aggressive to China and they took out their frustration on Taiwan, or we should have seen it coming and should have done everything to protect them.
Course we won't hear anything about how vile and brutal the Chicom regime is. Or how they're attacking a nation with the intention of conquering rather than liberating.
6
posted on
05/17/2004 5:13:33 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
To: Paul Ross
I wonder if the Chinese are now too addicted on trade with the west to follow through. In a day, all telecommunications and ports would be shut (bombed) down in a war with Taiwan. Maybe even bring some jobs back to America...
7
posted on
05/17/2004 5:18:45 AM PDT
by
2banana
(They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
To: Paul Ross
It's too bad we've sent so much of our manufacturing base to China, isn't it? We've also sent so much business their way that they've got lots of money to fund a larger military budget.
If mainland China crushes the people of Taiwan, I do hope the free-traitors aren't bashful about accepting full credit for making China strong enough to be a threat.
That's OK - I'll be sure to remind them.
8
posted on
05/17/2004 5:23:18 AM PDT
by
neutrino
(Everybody, soon or late, sits down to a banquet of consequences. Robert Louis Stevenson.)
To: Paul Ross
Actually they ARE two separate countries, unless you consider the communist provinces to be in rebellion. But the PRC loses face if you say so. And all the savages in the eastern hemisphere have to kill everybody over face. The world will be much better off without 1 billion savages. Make our day. Buh-bye.
9
posted on
05/17/2004 5:29:22 AM PDT
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: Paul Ross
To: OXENinFLA
Thanks for the ping. Sounds like China made Chen an offer he just can't refuse....
Prairie
11
posted on
05/17/2004 5:43:21 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(So Hillary, how DID you know about the descriptions of the abuse before Rumsfeld did? Hmmmmmmmmm??)
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Wonder how well-armed the Tiawanese really are ?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Probably depends upon how well they'd hold off the surface-to-surface missle attack.
13
posted on
05/17/2004 5:58:42 AM PDT
by
dagar
To: Paul Ross
We're pulling 4,000 troops out of Korea to send them to Iraq. It must be obvious to China that we're totally strapped, and East Asia is way on our back burner. It must be very tempting to China.
14
posted on
05/17/2004 6:59:13 AM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee
To: Paul Ross
To: dagar
If the South Africa regeme could have a hydrogen bomb by 1964...
To: Travis McGee
Which begs the question: Can S. Korea stop the North, and can China get across the straights?
18
posted on
05/17/2004 4:00:54 PM PDT
by
Dead Dog
To: Dead Dog
19
posted on
05/17/2004 4:28:00 PM PDT
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Paul Ross
Beijing Threatens Taipei With Destruction I threaten Beijing with destruction.
20
posted on
05/17/2004 4:30:58 PM PDT
by
steve86
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson