Syria ready to 'defend' itself against U.S.

WorldNetDaily ^ | 5/11/04 | Aaron Klein

[BritExPatInFla]

OK, sounds good, Oh, just a sec, we're going to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan and finish that part of the war on terror when? Before or after we start a new front in the war?

[wagglebee]

Yeah, the more troops we put into combat, the more crap we get from the left. Bomb the hell out of them and just leave the whole mess to get covered up by a sandstorm or something.

[Feckless]

To the spider holes!

[Bluemember]

Indulge me a moment, but does anyone else out there see a geographical strategy at work? More specically, that when Dubya wins in November, this plan will be in place. We have Iran flanked via Afghanistan and Iraq. We also have Syria flanked via Iraq and Israel. Is my reasoning sound? Wonder if Assad can say Mark-77 ??

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/08/08/1060145828249.html

[Brilliant]

Now, why would Syria think that we would want to invade? It couldn't be because they have WMD, could it?

[rebel_yell2]

The chemical weapons intercepted in Jordan were TOTALLY LOST in the news cycle with the breaking of the "prison torture" pictures. Where did they come from? Syria. We need to drain that swamp, but W can't do that until he is re-elected. If we get Kerry, we will get WMD on U.S. soil. Count on it. This is not about politics. It is about the future of our safety here in the U.S. How sad.