Posted on 04/24/2004 11:10:29 PM PDT by hobson
More research is probably needed regarding the standing orders for operation of the watercraft which Kerry commanded. Violating such orders by beaching the boat would seem to be justified only when the lives of the crew or other friendly forces justify it.
The descriptions I have read seem to indicate that a beaching took place once for the sole purpose of pursuing one enemy combatant. That would not seem to justify disobeying standing orders which are themselves designed to preserve the lives of friendly forces.
If the enemy could expect a beaching as a response to appearance of a single combatant, then they have a perfect opportunity to set-up an ambush. That is probably why the orders were that the craft should not be beached. Kerry probably deserved to be relieved of command. I see no indication that the orders were changed to reflect Kerry's superior judgement in the matter.
It was my experience that military personnel stationed in VietNam were obligated to a twelve month tour of duty. I don't see how Kerry can justify not having fulfilled that obligation.
I omitted the Bronze Star Citation signed by Adm. Zumwalt.
http://www.johnkerry.com/about/Bronze_Star.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.