Skip to comments.
Rolling Back Government: Lessons from New Zealand
Hillsdale College ^
| 4/15/04
| Maurice P. McTigue
Posted on 04/16/2004 12:32:48 PM PDT by jfreif
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
04/16/2004 12:33:09 PM PDT
by
jfreif
To: jfreif
When we started this process with the Department of Transportation, it had 5,600 employees. When we finished, it had 53. When we started with the Forest Service, it had 17,000 employees. When we finished, it had 17. When we applied it to the Ministry of Works, it had 28,000 employees. I used to be Minister of Works, and ended up being the only employee. Somebody needs to go hire these guys and put them to work in this country. Ministry of Works starts of with 28,000 employees and finishes with one - thats my kind of Minister.
2
posted on
04/16/2004 12:43:53 PM PDT
by
Timocrat
(I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
To: jfreif
Yes, Ronald Reagan was right: lower tax rates do produce more revenue. Memo to Lurch.
3
posted on
04/16/2004 12:45:33 PM PDT
by
Timocrat
(I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
To: shaggy eel
Hi there long time no talk to-*PING!*
4
posted on
04/16/2004 12:49:57 PM PDT
by
kstewskis
("Political correctness is intellectual terrorism..." M.G.)
To: jfreif
I love how they handled the driver license thing.
Think we could get them to invade us?
To: Timocrat
Since foreigners cannot become president lets just make this guy Dictator-for-a-Decade.
6
posted on
04/16/2004 1:06:11 PM PDT
by
azcap
To: jfreif
Wow, there might actually be hope for mankind after all.
7
posted on
04/16/2004 1:10:11 PM PDT
by
SpyGuy
To: jfreif
bump!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To: jfreif
The bad news is that New Zealand is now governed by socialists who are no doubt now working busily to reverse much of this.
To: Graymatter
Same thing happens in the UK. It beats standing in line at the MVD every year.
10
posted on
04/16/2004 3:21:26 PM PDT
by
Timocrat
(I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
To: jfreif
Bump for later study. This sounds like a dream. If Hillary ever manages to get elected, I'm moving to NZ!
11
posted on
04/16/2004 5:48:37 PM PDT
by
Marie
(My coffee cup is waaaaay too small to deal with this day.)
To: Timocrat
Somebody needs to go hire these guys and put them to work in this country. Ministry of Works starts of with 28,000 employees and finishes with one - thats my kind of Minister. But notice from the article that there had to be a financial crisis before anything positive got done. The same thing will have to happen in this country before the Republican led government growth and spending will end.
To: jfreif
What government programs have we cut or ended here? Every time someone wants to cut a program, some lib screams and froths that it will cut benefits.
13
posted on
04/17/2004 12:09:28 AM PDT
by
katz
( Rush is Right)
To: kstewskis
,,, thanx for the ping K. I took the week after easter off. I'll read thru this one now. Hope all is well = J
14
posted on
04/18/2004 2:12:54 PM PDT
by
shaggy eel
(www.rodneyhide.com)
To: Timocrat
Ministry of Works starts off with 28,000 employees and finishes with one ,,, it's crap. The restructurings didn't pan out that way at all. Take the example of the Ministry of Transport... 5600 employess that covered eight different occupational classes, all working under different terms and conditions under various awards. You had meteorologists, traffic cops, clerks and managers, lighthouse keepers and technicians thru to air traffic controllers. All those jobs didn't disappear from the face of the planet, they were restructed into three agancies - Maritime, Civil Aviation and Land Transport (for road and rail) - the 53 remaining employees that appear to be the pillars of transport for all New Zealand, are actually exist to serve the Minister of Transport and that's all there is to it.
15
posted on
04/18/2004 2:24:27 PM PDT
by
shaggy eel
(www.rodneyhide.com)
To: AMNZ
~
To: jfreif; Congressman Billybob
I just received my copy of this in the mail and was surprised it was posted with virtually no notice on Free Republic. Will someone please ping the White House and the Bush Administration?
Best regards,
17
posted on
05/02/2004 2:29:25 PM PDT
by
Copernicus
(A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
To: JohnHuang2
Will someone ping the White House and the Bush Administration? Best regards,
18
posted on
05/03/2004 2:27:24 PM PDT
by
Copernicus
(A Constitutional Republic revolves around Sovereign Citizens, not citizens around government.)
To: Graymatter
Better yet, give them Canada and then it would be closer to home and people will start wanting it for our country.
19
posted on
05/03/2004 2:29:54 PM PDT
by
Liberatio
(Please forgive my misspelling)
To: shaggy eel
"The restructurings didn't pan out that way at all". Thanks for that, uh, clarification. Was clearly too good to be true. Probably were some legitimate improvements. Beautiful country by the way.
20
posted on
05/03/2004 2:37:25 PM PDT
by
steve86
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson