Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarifications on the Case for Free Trade
Ludwig von Mises Institute ^ | 4/12/04 | Paul Craig Roberts

Posted on 04/12/2004 6:50:44 PM PDT by ninenot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-405 next last
To: RaceBannon
""""Easy. Let all these foreign countries develop technologies with their own money, not the money of American companies.""""

How about taxpayer funded research? Darpa, Universities, companies, Andy Grove did not invent the micro chip after all.

U.S. Taxpayer funded most of the Knowhow.
21 posted on 04/12/2004 7:53:25 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
Have Intel, AMD etc. close all foreign plants and bring the factories back home.

Nice, and have foreign companies do the same in a trade war... and the some 6 million US workers who work for foreign companies will be thrown out of work.
22 posted on 04/12/2004 7:53:42 PM PDT by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
I hope the people running the republican party have seen this. This is the one thing which could sink W. in November.
23 posted on 04/12/2004 7:54:56 PM PDT by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fooman
I do not know about that, %5OO bill deficit? you got to draw a line somewhere.

And hey, all they have to do is buy some our goods to open up the gates.
24 posted on 04/12/2004 7:58:16 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Seems they didn't want to speak to the ex-AOSmith Steelworkers, nor the ex-Evinrude IAMAW members, either.

Gutless, pasty-faced, and not too bright, either.
25 posted on 04/12/2004 7:58:56 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fooman
Why waive them? China steals them anyways.
26 posted on 04/12/2004 8:00:42 PM PDT by RaceBannon (VOTE DEMOCRAT AND LEARN ARABIC FREE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
Good insight. Our universities ( and England and PRussia before us) have paid enormous dividends in manufacturing and abosolute advantage in trade.
27 posted on 04/12/2004 8:01:29 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
Taxpayer profits are what made that research payout, not govt funds that HELPED research.

Also, any govt funds spent on research is usually done for a strategic advantage, not normal trade or commerce like China or India or Malaysia or Indonesia or European consortiums...
28 posted on 04/12/2004 8:02:40 PM PDT by RaceBannon (VOTE DEMOCRAT AND LEARN ARABIC FREE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
They can go to work for Intel or AMD Rather than Macdonalds's

No Pain , no gain
29 posted on 04/12/2004 8:02:46 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
PCR is right. I'm finishing my degree in Econ this May and I can tell you that no econ prof can tell you with a straight face that doors open free trade is the best strategy. It's an optimization problem like most things in econ. Based on what your criteria are, there are optimal city sizes, optimal tax rates, optimal interest rates, etc, and using horribly simplistic mathmatical models, and some programming, you can figure them out. Rarely, ie never, do such values come out to be zero. However that is what the current free traders argue our barriers to trade should be.

America has had a surplus of capital and scarcity of labor. Therefore returns to capital have been low and returns to labor high.

Free trade changes this. There is now a worldwide market, and capital is scare and labor cheap. Good if you have money to invest, bad if you make a wage.
30 posted on 04/12/2004 8:03:13 PM PDT by licenz2ill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
That is why this problem is tough...

We do NOT want to start a trade war with compatible countries. Many people would be worse off...
31 posted on 04/12/2004 8:03:18 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
I've spent a lot of good time with "union thugs." We disagree on almost everything--but they're good guys to quaff beer with, and there are SOME things on which we agree strongly....like the fact that, yes, those jerks ARE Traitors.
32 posted on 04/12/2004 8:07:35 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Sure it recycles. Microelectronics had it genesis in the space program along with hundreds of other products.

What about the billions funneled into biotechnology from the feds? think WE WOULD BE # 1 WITHOUT IT (caps OFF)
33 posted on 04/12/2004 8:11:59 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: underbyte
Sorry.

SAMNow (www.samnow.org) finance guru already came up with the concept.

We shaped it as "coupons." Country X gets a dollar coupon for every US manufactured good they import (dollar value.) THEY can ship goods here in the amount of coupons they have.

In addition, we will have a flexible tariff arrangement which accounts for cost-of-living/cost-of-doing-business--i.e., tax/reg/legal costs of US operations are hypothecated into tariffs on goods from China (e.g.)

Such a tariff would not affect Western European firms at all. Only 3-rd world sewers with no labor standards, no safety/enviro standards, etc.
34 posted on 04/12/2004 8:13:20 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Sinky, it's not just PJBuchanan. It's ALL those damn Reagan Administration types!!

Get with the program, Sink.
35 posted on 04/12/2004 8:14:28 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Paul Craig Roberts lost his mind five years ago.
36 posted on 04/12/2004 8:15:40 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Hardest thing is to have a truly original Idea, I guess a Nobel only goes to the Jimmy Carter's of the world, I am not sure I want to hang with that crowd anyway.

Point is there are solutions, not perfect but reasoble enough to work
37 posted on 04/12/2004 8:20:10 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ahban; Havoc
I wonder where all the Free Traitors are tonight?

They have a problem.

Both PJBuchanan AND Paul Craig Roberts worked for Ron Reagan, remember him?

So what are they going to say? That Reagan's advisers are crazy? Neanderthals? Buggy-whip, protectionist, isolationists?

Or Americans who just happen to be concerned about America?

38 posted on 04/12/2004 8:23:01 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Right now GM gives away the patent for a car design thinking that *only* china will benefit domestically.

But if they give up thier worldwide patent then Ford Chrysler, honda etc will also benefit.

In other words, if a company values its intellectual property at zero in China then the company loses property EVERYWHERE
39 posted on 04/12/2004 8:23:18 PM PDT by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Is that your Pastoral Response? Or your most intelligent one?
40 posted on 04/12/2004 8:24:46 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-405 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson