Skip to comments.
ITAA Report: NOT SO FAST
Computerworld ^
| 4/5/04
| Frank Hayes
Posted on 04/05/2004 9:26:29 AM PDT by ninenot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
04/05/2004 9:26:30 AM PDT
by
ninenot
To: Willie Green; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; hedgetrimmer; XBob; Elliott Jackalope; VOA; ...
Ping
2
posted on
04/05/2004 9:28:54 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: All
The Other Belly Girl
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
To: ninenot
The only solution is to secede from the world to protect American jobs.
To: ninenot
ITAA: founded by friends of Bill & Hill Clinton; run by friends of Bill & Hill Clinton; valuable arm of Clinton machine.
5
posted on
04/05/2004 9:54:43 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(The Kingdom of Heaven is taken by force - prayer)
To: xzins; Salem; dennisw; Jeff Head
ITAA is the organization pushing for electronic voting machines per previous thread on FR
6
posted on
04/05/2004 10:00:24 AM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam)
To: Reelect President Dubya
Frankly, I'd rather get Dubya to pay attention to these threads. He's taking a real beating in the Midwest on the manufacturing problem, and he doesn't need any more.
Of course, if he insists on calling everyone who brings up the problem as "isolationist protectionists" (translate neanderthal dummies), he may just not have ANY friends.
Rational discussion is good.
7
posted on
04/05/2004 10:20:04 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ninenot
There they go, trying to protect the jobs of the buggy-whip makers.
They should be thinking that if IT "professionals" hadn't demanded such obscene salaries in the past few years, companies might not have been quite so quick to "offshore" their jobs.
8
posted on
04/05/2004 11:46:18 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: Redbob
Do you s'pose that if so many damn fool companies had not OFFERED large sums to these folks that it would be different?
Still takes two to tango--or doesn't it?
9
posted on
04/05/2004 11:56:18 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: Redbob
You know, it always fascinates me when I see posts decrying "obscene salaries", demanded by 'IT "professionals"'.
Exactly at what point does a salary become "obscene"? The last company I worked for, the CEO got 660K, plus bonus, plus stock, plus car, plus driver, plus parking space (worth $26 a day in and of itself in SF) plus the usual other bennies. Yet, at about $120K MY middle managers salary was "obscene" and furthermore, with a BS in computer science, certifications in network and project management and continuous, self financed, training (about $1000 a year) to keep my skills current for the past 20+ years I am a "professional"
For the benefit of the rest of us, could you please express for us your definition of
(1) An "obscene salary" and
(2) An actual professional as opposed to a "professional"?
Thank you.
10
posted on
04/05/2004 2:40:13 PM PDT
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Where there is no vision, the people perish.)
To: ninenot
And that economic growth depends on the willingness of the foreign employees who get our offshored jobs to spend their paychecks on U.S.-made exports. Only two things wrong with this idea that I see.
(1)It assumes we will still be making stuff to export to those foreng workers
(2)It requires that they (the foreign workers in question) will double cross their fellow countrymen by buying American made goods (if there still are any) at higher prices than those made by their own neighbors (thereby putting them out of work the way we Americans put our fellow Americans out of work by buying duty free cheap foreign goods).
11
posted on
04/05/2004 3:00:10 PM PDT
by
templar
To: templar
Uhhh-it ALSO assumes that the folks earning 25 cents/hour in China can actually purchase a washing machine, e.g.
12
posted on
04/06/2004 7:59:04 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: InABunkerUnderSF; Willie Green; afraidfortherepublic; A. Pole; hedgetrimmer; XBob; ...
The President of the Catholic Knights' Insurance Company (located in Milwaukee) has raised this issue, rather forcefully stating that CEO emoluments are more than generous.
The following Companies paid their CEO MORE THAN 100X the comp of their lowest-level workers: Cendant, Compuware, Delta Air Lines, the El Paso Corp., International Paper, Sun Microsystems and Viacom.
Further, "In 2002 the average CEO of a public company made about 300 times more than the average worker at his or her concern, according to data compiled by the AFL-CIO.
"That is down from the 531 times posted in 2000, probably a reflection of the poor stock markets of 2001 and 2002 that devalued the options composing a large part of executive pay packets. Information for 2003 will not be available until proxy statements are sent out later this year."
FYI, Steininger is paid 7x the comp of his lowest-paid FTE.
13
posted on
04/06/2004 8:11:18 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: InABunkerUnderSF
Exactly at what point does a salary become "obscene"?
Way, way back in the 1970s, I remember the "obscene profits" epithet hurled
at oil companies (by liberals as they had their down-stairs help fill the
gas-tank of their limos).
This was brought into perspective by a chemical-engineer friend who said
"the losses from a failed oil-exploration project are obscene as well".
14
posted on
04/06/2004 10:09:42 AM PDT
by
VOA
To: templar
You are looking at these countries as they actually are, rather than how these free traders wished that they were.
Shame on you for spoiling the party.
15
posted on
04/06/2004 10:19:23 AM PDT
by
Mortimer Snavely
(Comitas, Firmitas, Gravitas, Humanitas, Industria)
To: ninenot
The difference in compensation between CEOs and line workers doesn't bother me a bit. What does bother me is the exportation of the production lines to Red China.
16
posted on
04/06/2004 10:21:30 AM PDT
by
Mortimer Snavely
(Comitas, Firmitas, Gravitas, Humanitas, Industria)
To: ninenot
I don't really care what anyone else makes. Charge what the market will bare.
I do object when someone like a Sumner Redsone of Viacom makes what he makes, then goes to China in 1999 to celebrate the founding of the PRC and declares himself to be a "Socialist At Heart". If he is a Socialist At Heart, why doesn't he show it by cutting his salary to the Viacom Mean and donating his wealth to the federal government to be redistributed?
I also object to people like Carly Fiorina, who send thousands of jobs off shore and bring in thousands more foreign contractors into the US to improve "competitiveness" and then rake in huge salaries with all the corporate bennies money can buy. If she and her board are so concerned about "competitiveness", why isn't she working for what HP pays their H1B and L1 contractors?
17
posted on
04/06/2004 11:31:03 AM PDT
by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Where there is no vision, the people perish.)
To: ninenot
Frankly, I'd rather get Dubya to pay attention to these threads. He's taking a real beating in the Midwest on the manufacturing problem, and he doesn't need any more. The Truth About Offshoring
To: Reelect President Dubya
Yeah, I saw the article.
And you likely saw the article from ComputerWorld in which the reporter absolutely SLAMMED the outsourcers, too.
As long as GWB insists on calling names "isolationist, protectionist" at ANYONE who dares to question the wisdom of the FreeTraders, he's losing support. Sorry--it's true.
He can do what he thinks is best. I can't vote Kerry, but...
19
posted on
04/08/2004 10:32:34 AM PDT
by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
To: ninenot
As long as GWB insists on calling names "isolationist, protectionist" at ANYONE who dares to question the wisdom of the FreeTraders, he's losing support. Sorry--it's true. I bet you voted for Ross Perot.
Mouthing nice words don't make it so.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson