Skip to comments.
New Fossil Links Four-legged Land Animals To Ancient Fish
National Science Foundation ^
| 01 April 2004
| Staff
Posted on 04/02/2004 4:25:18 PM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-456 last
To: RobRoy
Answer the question. Can police tell whether a bone belongs to a human?
441
posted on
04/06/2004 12:50:22 PM PDT
by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: RobRoy
Nobody really "knows" what caused this feature in the Arizona landscape. No witnesses. Can't be reproduced in the lab. Therefore it's pure speculation:
442
posted on
04/06/2004 12:54:04 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: PatrickHenry
What feature? Al I see is a blurry image that could easily be faked in photoshop. Don't peddle your religion to me.
Besides, belief in computer screens is just a religion.
443
posted on
04/06/2004 12:57:44 PM PDT
by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: RobRoy
By your reasoning, Scott Peterson, OJ Simpson, and Kobe Bryant,cannot be guilty; there were no witnesses. It's the Johnny Cochran method of denying scientific investigation.
444
posted on
04/06/2004 1:20:29 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: js1138
Clearly someone dug it. You can see the highway which was used to transport the dirt away from there and later used to build Boulder Dam.
445
posted on
04/06/2004 1:23:24 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
No witnesses. Can't be reproduced in the lab. Therefore it's pure speculation:
446
posted on
04/06/2004 4:38:13 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Hic amor, haec patria est.)
To: Dimensio
[ I guess that you don't have any refutation to the information that Ichneumon provided? Why can't you just come out and say "I admit that I have absolutely no facts to back up my assertions"? ]
Had no intention of refuteing it. Mocking it is more like what I doing.. You not noticing that shows you might have missed other things.
To: js1138
[(ME) Everybody is preaching something more by what they do than by what they say.. ]
[(YOU) The Bill clinton argument: everybody's doing it.]
You have morphed what I said into a really strange brew..
Are you a DEMOCRAT..?
To: RobRoy
So you are not one of the Evolutionist religious zealots. Not all who study evolution are. Many are real scientists.No, I am not...but you must admit there are "zealots" on both sides of the argument, yes? Regardless of which camp a person is in, we still have a lot to learn. I don't think the theory of natural selection has it quite right, and certainly the folks who simply say that God waved His hand and all came into being don't have a lock on the facts either. A LOT more went into the creation of this Universe. Anyone who claims to know the "truth" is suspect in my mind.
To: VadeRetro
They say it's the thumbs that really tell the story.Ah, the measure of a man...and there is some science to back up the contention, statistically speaking. ;^)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Thanks! And good luck on your exam.T - 2h 10 mins...alas, between a sick husband, the kids, work, house, an aging father, and assorted pets there has been precious little time for study. Speaking of which, why am I here? Goodbye for now.
And thank you for the good wishes.
To: hosepipe
No, just responding to incoherence with incoherence. If you ever make an actual point, I'll try to respond in kind.
452
posted on
04/07/2004 7:23:04 AM PDT
by
js1138
(In a minute there is time, for decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. J Forbes Kerry)
To: js1138
[ No, just responding to incoherence with incoherence. If you ever make an actual point, I'll try to respond in kind. ]
This argument don't hold together..
To: Piltdown_Woman
I completely agree with every word of your post!
454
posted on
04/07/2004 10:47:42 AM PDT
by
RobRoy
(Science is about "how." Christianity is about "why.")
To: hosepipe
Had no intention of refuteing it. Mocking it is more like what I doing..
Well, at least you admit that you're resorting to childish tactics when you can't address the facts that you don't like.
You not noticing that shows you might have missed other things.
I did notice. I just wonder why you mock, when it makes you look foolish rather than your opponent.
455
posted on
04/07/2004 11:03:00 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
(I gave you LIFE! I -- AAAAAAAAH!)
Note: this topic was posted 4/2/2004. Thanks PatrickHenry.
456
posted on
04/22/2014 7:56:04 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440, 441-456 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson