From Russia With Terror

Front Page Mazine ^ | 3-1-04 | Jamie Glazov

[GOP_1900AD]

So by your logic, if some other country, say, Egypt, was buying lots of cheap stuff from, say, Saudi Arabia, then it would be OK for the USA to sell them our equivalent of Sovermenny ships and carrier destroying missiles; simply because it was Egypt who bought all the cheap stuff. Egypt would therefore be the bad guy, because they shopped at Al Walmart, not us for selling them arms?

[GOP_1900AD]

So by your logic, if some other country, say, Egypt, was buying lots of cheap stuff from, say, the Philippines, then it would be OK for the USA to sell the the Philippines our equivalent of Sovermenny ships and our equivalent of carrier destroying missiles; simply because it was Egypt who bought all the cheap stuff from the Philippines? Egypt would therefore be the bad guy, because they shopped at Al Walmart and bought lots of cheap stuff from the Philippines, not us for selling the Philippines the arms?

[RusIvan]

Egypt would therefore be the bad guy, because they shopped at Al Walmart and bought lots of cheap stuff from the Philippines, not us for selling the Philippines the arms? ==

I think that IF one guy against that another one buys some stuff form third guy then WHY then he himself provided all the money?
It is very strange for first guy to request that third guy won't sell stuff to second he gave money first to.

SO IF first guy is serious about stopping the buys of second guy then he may stop his own transaction with this second guy. Second guy will run out of money and everything will stop.
Otherwise it is not fair to ask third guy to do things which first guy refuses to do himself.

So I conclude to you. SHOW GOOD EXAMPLE FIRST. Or stop complains.