Skip to comments.
Iraq Arms Inspector Says Search Is a Tangle
NY Times ^
| March 31, 2004
| DOUGLAS JEHL
Posted on 03/30/2004 7:09:24 PM PST by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Levin and Duelfer are basically calling each other liars. I'll go with the guy who's lying is the one whose surname can make an alliteration with liar.
1
posted on
03/30/2004 7:09:26 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
What buried Iraqi MiGs look like:



2
posted on
03/30/2004 7:13:52 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Holder of an M.A. degree in The Obvious)
To: martin_fierro
100 tons of what we are looking for could be stored in a small garage. Assuming everything was kept together, and not scattered, it will be a long time before anything is found.
3
posted on
03/30/2004 7:16:01 PM PST
by
oolatec
To: neverdem
Mr. Duelfer, who took charge of the search in January, said at a news conference on Capitol Hill that the picture of Iraq's suspicious activities "is much more complicated than I anticipated going in."Duelfer went in as a WMD skeptic. He's apparently not skeptical anymore.
4
posted on
03/30/2004 7:17:15 PM PST
by
alnick
To: martin_fierro; Amelia
When was that found?
5
posted on
03/30/2004 7:17:41 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: neverdem
Which country does Levin work for?
To: neverdem
conditions at the prison where they are being held are obviously too good. they should be on chain gangs, digging up suspected WMD sites 10 hours a day with shovels. a couple of weeks of that - they'll talk.
7
posted on
03/30/2004 7:19:42 PM PST
by
oceanview
To: Howlin
8
posted on
03/30/2004 7:28:21 PM PST
by
ntnychik
To: oceanview
-"conditions at the prison where they are being held are obviously too good. they should be on chain gangs, digging up suspected WMD sites 10 hours a day with shovels. a couple of weeks of that - they'll talk."
Amen to that!
9
posted on
03/30/2004 7:33:03 PM PST
by
firebug01
(Support Bush!...THE MEDIA LIES!!)
To: Howlin
10
posted on
03/30/2004 7:43:40 PM PST
by
martin_fierro
(Holder of an M.A. degree in The Obvious)
To: neverdem
We shouldn't allow this WMD stuff to sidetrack us. Yes, it would have been great if we'd found a bunch of nukes and nerve gas lined up in clearly-labelled stainless steel cannisters like in some James Bond movie.
But let's not forget why we're really in Iraq: The middle-east is a swamp of dysfunctional regimes that produces suicide bombers intent on killing us. The US is over there because somebody needs to start draining that swamp. I'm thankful that we have a president who has the vision and the guts to take the job on.
11
posted on
03/30/2004 7:51:29 PM PST
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: neverdem
They wont talk? put a gun to thier head(empty chamber & clip... pull trigger)! Still wont talk put a live gun to thier wives head!
To: Starve The Beast
I agree with your assessment, but there's nothing written in stone saying we'll succeed and have an intact Iraq that's some sort of democratic republic, ideally. That's why it would be so nice to stick it in the faces of the rats. BTW, I read today on NRO, IIRC, that it was the Germans who told us that Iraq had mobile chem and bio production facilities.
13
posted on
03/30/2004 8:02:18 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: martin_fierro; ntnychik
Some were found on April 16, 2003. More found on July 6, 2003.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1036015/posts
http://cryptome.org/iraq-mig.htm
15
posted on
03/30/2004 8:11:56 PM PST
by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: neverdem
...there's nothing written in stone saying we'll succeed and have an intact Iraq that's some sort of democratic republic... You are certainly correct, unfortunately. Our effort to bring democracy to Iraq as a start to stabilizing the Middle East is a huge undertaking, and may easily fail. But we need to do something. Hats off to Bush for this bold attempt, and let's hope it's a success.
16
posted on
03/30/2004 8:18:05 PM PST
by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
To: Howlin
Another reason there are spastic democrats:
APRIL 2003 late : (LONDON TELEGRAPH UNEARTHS DOCUMENTS LINKING AL QAEDA & IRAQI INTELLIGENCE) The unearthing of documents directly linking Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda organization to Saddam Hussein this weekend may have hermetically sealed the Bush administration's case that dismantling Iraq's Baathist enterprise was in part necessary to undo terrorism's dynamic duo. But closing that case may reopen a Pandora's box for ex-Clinton administration officials who still believe their policy prescriptions protected U.S. national interests against the growing threat of terrorism during the past decade.
The London Telegraph's weekend revelations raise deeply disturbing questions about the extent and magnitude to which President Clinton, his national-security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, and senior terrorism and State Department officials including Assistant Secretary of State for East Africa, Susan Rice politicized intelligence data, relied on and even circulated fabricated evidence in making critical national-security decisions, and presided over a string of intelligence failures during the months leading up to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.
Analysis of documents found in the rubble of Iraq's intelligence headquarters show that contrary to conventional wisdom, Iraqi military and intelligence officials sought out al Qaeda leaders, not the other way around, and ultimately met with bin Laden on at least two occasions. They also show that channels of communication between al Qaeda and Iraq were created much earlier and were wider ranging in scope than previously thought. The timing of the meetings sheds important new light on how grave the Clinton administration's intelligence failures may have been. On February 19, 1998, about six months prior to the attacks in Dar Es Salaam and Nairobi, Iraqi intelligence officials set in motion a plan to bring a senior and trusted bin Laden aide to Baghdad from Khartoum. One of the key Mukhabarat intelligence documents shows that a recommendation was made for "
the deputy director general to bring the [bin Laden] envoy to Iraq because we may find in this envoy a way to maintain contacts with bin Laden." The meetings took place in March 1998. "The Clinton Intel Record Deeper failures revealed. ," by Mansoor Ijaz, National Review Online, 4-29-2003
17
posted on
03/30/2004 8:24:08 PM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: neverdem
There were more than 3 reportsfrom different sources the sighting of large caravans of trucks originating in Iraq and headed for Syria, and ultimately Lebanon's Bekaa Valley... before the war. Saddam hid his Aces under the table, and he still plans on using them. The reason we have not found WMD's in Iraq, is because they have been moved from Iraq. That should be obvious by now. So, what to do? Perhaps we need much, much more intelligence presence on the ground in Syria and Lebanon? Seems logical, eh?
To: Richard Axtell
So, what to do? Perhaps we need much, much more intelligence presence on the ground in Syria and Lebanon? Definitely, the question is how to get native Arabs to get under cover for us and not be double agents. That took a long time with the commies.
19
posted on
03/30/2004 8:46:23 PM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi min oi)
To: neverdem
Let the Israli's interrogate them!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson