Skip to comments.
Court Bars Release of Vince Foster Death Photos
Reuters ^
| 3-30-04
| By James Vicini
Posted on 03/30/2004 8:41:11 AM PST by johnny7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Damn shame.
1
posted on
03/30/2004 8:41:12 AM PST
by
johnny7
To: johnny7
One wonders why the government released the photos of the torched Davidians if familial privacy is supreme. One wonders further, why the television press or any photographer then will, in the future, be allowed on the scene of any accident or tragedy.
To: johnny7
A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that four death-scene photographs of Vince Foster, the deputy White House counsel who killed himself in 1993Reuters, which is usually so careful about coming to any conclusions, has often used the term "alleged terrorists" to describe what everyone else understands to be "terrorists." So, they should have considered adding the word "allegedly" right between "who" and "killed himself."
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
ALL WE WANT TO SEE IS A CASE OF ARKNCIDE.
4
posted on
03/30/2004 9:01:36 AM PST
by
jocko12
To: Sgt_Schultze
I was wondering the same thing. So does this mean that ANY family who's loved one is shown in a crime magazine or in a court room can sue for privacy reasons?
If so, the MSM better get ready for lots of lawsuits! And Chrissy Matthews who just went to Walter Reed to show maimed soldiers should be sued too.
To: johnny7
Makes me wonder how the Zapruder Film was allowed to be released.
Where is the reasoning here?
6
posted on
03/30/2004 9:09:41 AM PST
by
#1CTYankee
(Damn earthlings, there goes the neighborhood."Marvin the Martian")
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: johnny7
The judge wasn't apparently bothered by eyewitness testimony, the fact that there are no x-rays of the body, that Foster's keys were missing from the body and he supposedly drove himself to Fort Marcy Park, that neither bone fragments or the bullet were ever recovered from the scene.
No. The judge obviously thinks all of that makes sense. And as far as the photos? They would merely relfect that the entire death scene was as idiotic as the so-called investigation.
To: Reactionary
You're stuttering again ; )
16
posted on
03/30/2004 9:18:05 AM PST
by
#1CTYankee
(Damn earthlings, there goes the neighborhood."Marvin the Martian")
To: Alamo-Girl; Mia T
ping for your opinions...
17
posted on
03/30/2004 9:18:34 AM PST
by
netmilsmom
(Hugs to Conspiracy Guy & Laura Earl on their marriage-3/27/03)
To: Reactionary
No more coffee for you.
18
posted on
03/30/2004 9:19:09 AM PST
by
rabidralph
(Fear the Turtle next season.)
To: BushisTheMan
So does this mean that ANY family who's loved one is shown in a crime magazine or in a court room can sue for privacy reasons? No, this has to do with the Freedom of Information Act-- it applies only when the Government has photos in its possession and the media are trying to force them to be released.
To: Reactionary
The judge wasn't apparently Not one judge, but all 9-- this was a unanimous ruling.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson