Skip to comments.
Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race
From New Scientist Online News ^
| 19:00 13 August 03
| By David Hambling
Posted on 03/29/2004 4:44:36 PM PST by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Very interesting.
1
posted on
03/29/2004 4:44:38 PM PST
by
vannrox
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: AllenBarraIsRight
Wonder if that baby nuke will fit in the 20mm round of the OICW?
To: AllenBarraIsRight
Arms race with which country?
4
posted on
03/29/2004 4:56:18 PM PST
by
The Raven
To: vannrox
In 20 years the public school graduates of today will make their way into the workforce. Any such programmes are doomed. We'll be lucky to have a catapault and a rock.
5
posted on
03/29/2004 4:57:26 PM PST
by
blackdog
(I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
To: vannrox
Wow. I can't wait to get me some hafnium M-80s!
6
posted on
03/29/2004 4:58:53 PM PST
by
Sender
(You're it.)
To: vannrox
If they can control the release of this energy, it would permit power packs of extraordinary density. The idea of storing the energy equivalent of 50 tons of explosive in a single gram means batteries of stupendous power. There are less than about 500 grams to a pound.
7
posted on
03/29/2004 4:59:42 PM PST
by
wretchard
To: vannrox
Sorry, not 50 tons, but kilograms. Still that is a lot of punch.
8
posted on
03/29/2004 5:00:27 PM PST
by
wretchard
To: vannrox
Great. If you don't shoot your eye with it, it'll turn you into the Incredible Hulk. :-)
To: vannrox
A few years back, there was talk about the russians having a very small form of tac nuke, about the size of a baseball.
I'm wondering if it might have been this. If 1 gram has the explosive force of 5 kilos of TNT, a kilo would be 5 metric tons, which is a pretty impressive blast. It probably would not set off radiation alarms, making it a good terrorist weapon.
As an energy-storage medium, it's also impressive, particularly since you can "recharge" it
10
posted on
03/29/2004 5:02:11 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
To: wretchard
Gamma rays aren't exactly easy to efficiently convert to electricity on a small scale. "Killing those all around" provides a hint.
11
posted on
03/29/2004 5:03:16 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: SauronOfMordor
5=50, even more impressive (when I get the right numbers off the silly article)
12
posted on
03/29/2004 5:05:00 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
To: vannrox
I thought we already had this weapon, i.e., the neutron bomb.
13
posted on
03/29/2004 5:05:13 PM PST
by
kabar
To: vannrox
The energy is stored in atomic nucleii, and so would be "nuclear weapons" under any reasonable definition of the word. They are not fission nor fusion, however.
14
posted on
03/29/2004 5:05:54 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: wretchard
Might be of use in outer space applications such as a moon or Mars base.
15
posted on
03/29/2004 5:06:15 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: kabar
Nope, those are fission or bombs adjusted to emit lots of neutrons, which are fatal. You have to make a supercritical mass to do this. This weapon, however, does not rely on fission, and releases gamma rays, not neutrons. There is no lower threshold like a critical mass that must be assembled for the weapon to work.
16
posted on
03/29/2004 5:08:50 PM PST
by
coloradan
(Hence, etc.)
To: vannrox
The Isomer State of HF-178(16+) Authors: Zajac, Taras M.; UZHGOROD STATE UNIV (UKRAINE) DEPT OF PHYSICS
Abstract: This report results from a contract tasking Uzhgorod State University as follows: The contractor will investigate the nuclear levels of the 178Hf isomer and the transition probabilities between the levels as described in his proposals.
Pages: 25
Report Date: 1997
17
posted on
03/29/2004 5:10:42 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
To: vannrox
All together now...
Doc Bruce Banner, belted by gamma rays,
turns into the Hulk, ain't he unglamorous?
Wreckin' the town with the power of a bull,
Ain't no monster clown, who is that lovable?
It's ever lovin' Hulk! HULK! HULK
18
posted on
03/29/2004 5:10:53 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
A gamma-ray arms race could lead to a real showdown:


19
posted on
03/29/2004 5:13:10 PM PST
by
Fedora
To: HitmanNY
You beat me to it by one post :)
20
posted on
03/29/2004 5:13:41 PM PST
by
Fedora
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson