Clinton, Gore Not Slated to Give 9/11 Testimony Under Oath

Newsmax ^ | 3-29-04 | Carl Limbacher

[ravingnutter]

Cause they are on a witch hunt against Condi .. That's why

Exactly...they are trying to destroy Condi's credibility in the public eye now, they are afraid she is going to run for President in 2008 against Hitlery.

[TC Rider]

Oath only means something to someone that values their character and their word. In other words, no use putting them under oath, they'd just lie anyway.

Exactly

[AMNZ]

So, what's your point. We all know they're going to lie anyway.

[Choose Ye This Day]

Miniter's book should be REQUIRED reading for every pundit, flak and shill that opens his pie hole about Clarke's "impeccable" credentials.

[daybreakcoming]

Just spit coffee on the keyboard. These two under OATH???
LOL Just means their lies would only have to be a little more clever amd bubba will have to work on his lip biting. The media will take care of the rest.

[My2Cents]

Bingo. I think that's pretty clear. From what I understand, the White House and Condi have been pretty accessible and cooperative in executive session, so the only "advantage" to public testimony is the aforementioned "grandstanding".

[My2Cents]

Is there any way to write or email the Commission? It's obviously a political entity; they should be willing to take the heat from the public.

[My2Cents]

Why has John Lewis Gaddis appeared on "Today," "60 Minutes," "GMA," "Hardball," et al, unlike Clarke? (Don't bother answering; I already know why.)

[mewzilla]

Have you read his book, though? Read his book.

[My2Cents]

Last night Drudge said Woodward has a book coming out in two weeks that is supposed to be more explosive than Clark's.

Woodward...Oh, you mean the guy who lied about "Deep Throat"?

[bornintexas]

Maybe that is why they are coming after Condi so hard.....they know the President will not let her testify in public....so the dims can use this as a excuse for the impeachedone/algore not to testify....makes you go ummmm

Also, on being sworn/not sworn in when they give their testimony......heard Lehman on the Today show this morning say that it doesn't matter......it is illegal to lie to their commission.....whether they are sworn in or not. He told LIARMatt that it didn't matter if Condi was sworn in or not......it is illegal either way. I wondered at the time if he was sending a message to Clarke about his private testimony.

[freeperfromnj]

He's the one. It seems like all the rats were holding off putting their books out until the time period between the 9/11 hearings and the election. The fact that we have a commission that cites lies from newly released books is an outrage.

[My2Cents]

I guess this is their strategy to get around Campaign Finance Reform -- publish a critical book, make the rounds of the major news magazine shows, and then getting your day before a commission tops it all off.

[antivenom]

The Republicans should practice something the LEFTISTS have down to a fine science.

GET CONDI to scream from the rooftops that she is being PERSECUTED because she is BLACK and a WOMEN...that everyone else "excused" are WHITE MEN!

[Irish Eyes]

This is a circus and shouldn't be treated as such by the Bush administration.

Say what??

[BigSkyFreeper]

info@9-11Commission.gov

[BigSkyFreeper]

drag it out until CBS can run another 60 minutes hit piece hawking Woodward's book.

Woodward will be interviewed on 60 Minutes. His book is also being published by the same publishing house of Paul O'Neil and Richard Clarke's book. Yep, you guessed it, Simon & Shuster. The same publishing house owned by Viacom, which owns SeeBS.

[madison10]

Methinks "someone" is waiting for Bob Woodward's book to come out for Round #2 of the smear campaign or until an "event" occurs. What was the next step in that blasted Democrat memo anyway?

This commission is a joke. Could've guessed it would turn into an anti-Bush fest.

[BigSkyFreeper]

You could go one step further with that. The Liberals are going after Condi because she may become a VP nominee in the not-so-distant future, the Democrats will lose that election, and they know it.

[Stultis]

Cause they are on a witch hunt against Condi .. That's why

<'RAT MODE>Let us burn her!</'RAT MODE>