Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA News Conference on Mars ~~~~ Live Thread

Posted on 03/23/2004 10:58:01 AM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
To: Diogenesis
"Large amounts of bromine, heterogeneously distributed."

Interesting. That sounds like just a few localized spots here on Earth. Bromine compounds aren't all that common as naturally-occurring minerals here on this planet.

Sounds like a poisonous sort of pool.
41 posted on 03/23/2004 11:16:54 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Regolith under the water bodies would have been saturated and might still be. Bedrock might also have cracks filled with ice, and that ice would be pure water by now. They will have to send drillbot, and then if it taps a vein of ice they can start designing the marsbase.
42 posted on 03/23/2004 11:18:44 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
If Mars had oceans, where's the water now? Is it frozen at the poles, captured in rocks, etc? Also, how much warmer must Mars have been to support an ocean? How did it first gain the warmth then lose it???
43 posted on 03/23/2004 11:19:02 AM PST by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K; craig_eddy
Try here if you're still having problems. I'm listening to it there myself. Sound works. Comcast stinks.
44 posted on 03/23/2004 11:19:05 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: craig_eddy
Oh yes. Probably pretty shallow but covered much of the planet (My guess)

"Life" advanced to maybe the single cell or even primitive organisms but then the water "evaporated" into space and it was curtains for the little critters. (Also my guess)

45 posted on 03/23/2004 11:20:23 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
And of course, the implication of finding fossiles is that there would have to have been a food chain to sustain them.
46 posted on 03/23/2004 11:20:36 AM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
Lost into space, most of it. Mars is just too small.
47 posted on 03/23/2004 11:21:01 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
This was a habitable environment on Mars based upon texture and morphology of rocks.


48 posted on 03/23/2004 11:21:39 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
How did it first gain the warmth then lose it???

Just blind guessing here, but it is possible that Mars wasn't always as far from the sun as it is now?

49 posted on 03/23/2004 11:22:15 AM PST by mitchbert (Facts are Stubborn Things)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Cool explanation of cross-bedding. Never heard it before.
50 posted on 03/23/2004 11:22:20 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
No, it had enough atmopshere to retain heat, but lost the atmosphere. Orbit hasn't changed radically or anything.
51 posted on 03/23/2004 11:22:41 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
How did it first gain the warmth then lose it???

During initial formation it would have been very warm, perhaps molten. Then it cooled, but asteroidal debris would have added energy to the system for quite a while. Now it has cooled to ambient temperature and the mass is much smaller than earth's mass, so it wouldn't have as much internal heating by radioactive decay. Mars is going to stay cold until we do certain public works projects there.

52 posted on 03/23/2004 11:23:21 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mitchbert
I wonder if a process related to the creation and stabilization of the asteroid field between Mars and Jupiter may have expanded Mars' orbit?
53 posted on 03/23/2004 11:25:06 AM PST by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Concave Martial "smiles" as evidence of crossbedding
based upon terrestrial sand-water models (MIT).

"Smiles" have a size ~ 1cm.

Open upward concave geometries declare the previous running water.

54 posted on 03/23/2004 11:26:58 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Zappas rule. But the cooking show is kind of lame. They did an entire show on pancake breakfasts and never played "Electric Aunt Jemima".
55 posted on 03/23/2004 11:27:03 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
They have discovered Mars is gay!

Nope, it must be that Mars wants to get married to Mercury in a civil ceremony..

56 posted on 03/23/2004 11:28:53 AM PST by threat matrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; mikegi
If the ocean was shallow, it probably drained into the bedrock, just like the earth is doing as we speak. In another few million years, the ocean beds will be mostly empty.
57 posted on 03/23/2004 11:29:20 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All
Martial water flow rates ~ 1-2 klicks per hour

Seems that those who considered the possibility of Martian artifacts were correct to do so.
NASA owes them a very big apology.

58 posted on 03/23/2004 11:30:09 AM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
It also means the ASU-built Phoenix landers (which will be launched in 2007) and the 2009 Mars Science Laboratory rover (which will be about the size of a sub-compact automobile!) will likely carry very advanced spectrometers to look specifically for chemical signals for life in the past, just like we look the chemical makeup of fossilized rocks on Earth with spectrometers.

It'll be interesting to see if the European Space Agency will want to launch its own larger-sized rover to look for signs of life (past and present); they certainly have a powerful enough rocket with the Ariane V to launch a rover almost the size of a sub-compact automobile.

59 posted on 03/23/2004 11:30:10 AM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
The total mass of all the asteroids is far short of another planet, so the gravitational interchange effects would have been minor to Mars. Jupiter would be the major influence on the Asteroid Belt, but probably Mars swept up a few asteroids, and some of the collisions were monstrous. By the time the energy exchanges were mostly over, Mars would have begun to cool and would be in its present orbit.
60 posted on 03/23/2004 11:30:32 AM PST by RightWhale (Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson