Skip to comments.
Withholding Identity From a Law Officer: Your Right or Not?
Associated Press ^
| March 23, 2004
| Gina Holland
Posted on 03/23/2004 6:10:30 AM PST by wallcrawlr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 501-515 next last
To: GreatEconomy
2. My only agenda on this thread is to comment on another posters inflammatory statements. And to find out why you feel a need to be nasty and confrontational. I do not believe you when you say you are not involved in this case. You are way too emotional for that to make sense. I do not believe you. I believe your agenda is to silence the truth in this issue.
221
posted on
03/23/2004 10:40:53 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: Cap'n Crunch
Nice to see you're still around and haven't lost your sense of humor. I think it's inevitable that a national ID card is right around the corner, as things seems to get progressively worse.
To: GreatEconomy
cinFLA has got some serious issues don't he/she? Trying to silence me with personal attacks? What is your agenda?
223
posted on
03/23/2004 10:42:20 AM PST
by
cinFLA
Comment #224 Removed by Moderator
To: judgeandjury
I would imagine that this is asked of individuals by law enforcement personnel in just about every other country in the world.The USA used to be better than just about every other country in the world.
Comment #226 Removed by Moderator
To: cinFLA
Do you believe everything that an activist, liberal reporter writes? About as much as I believe everything a cop says. If you don't think that many cops lie, you are wrong.
From the article:Justice Sandra Day O'Connor pointed out that the court has never given police the authority to demand someone's identification without probable cause that they have done something wrong.
To: GreatEconomy
1. Today was the first time I heard of this case. I have no relation other than an interested citizen. For your information, this topic has a long history on FR and some of the posters on this thread have a long history with the topic. All is not as seen just on this thread.
You said stated your agenda on this thread but it is interesting that you only attacked one side. It is not your duty to personally insult others just because you feel like it. If you want to move the thread to a more factual discussion, then do so. It would be most welcome.
228
posted on
03/23/2004 10:54:20 AM PST
by
cinFLA
Comment #229 Removed by Moderator
To: GreatEconomy
I think it got too hot in here for cinFLA. Or maybe he/she stepped out to take that break they so desparately needed. Let's hope. It pays to hit refresh before posting.
230
posted on
03/23/2004 10:58:19 AM PST
by
cinFLA
Comment #231 Removed by Moderator
Comment #232 Removed by Moderator
To: GreatEconomy
Seems like you are NUMBER ONE in the number of personal attacks on this thread.
233
posted on
03/23/2004 11:01:39 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: American_Centurion
"It's been years since I met a young LEO who wasn't on a power trip. Something has changed in the training that manifests itself in the LEO being a A-hole."Yup, sure has; but, it ain't the training that's changed.
It's the screwed-up, hyper-vilolent, increasingly criminal and hellbent, mindlessly belligerent public.
That's what has changed.
A cop's not a shrink; which, apparently some [here] think they oughta be.
As a taxpayer-citizen I'm paying those guys to enforce the law.
Period.
If I were policing today an individual would be told *once* why we came into contact & what'd be needed for me to go away, not twice.
Putting on a badge these days just for the *privlege* of dealing with a near-psychotic public (& their warped sheisters) demands one rely on a base survival instinct, quickly; or, be eaten *alive*.
...*fact*.
234
posted on
03/23/2004 11:01:39 AM PST
by
Landru
(Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
Comment #235 Removed by Moderator
Comment #236 Removed by Moderator
Comment #237 Removed by Moderator
Comment #238 Removed by Moderator
To: GreatEconomy
I see you cannot leave gracefully but must leave a parting personal attack.
239
posted on
03/23/2004 11:08:13 AM PST
by
cinFLA
To: JackRyanCIA
If true, and I assume it was since you said there was a tapeThe alleged hitting is not on the tape.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 501-515 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson