Skip to comments.
Consenting Adults: Responding to a Cannibal
BreakPoint with Charles Colson ^
| 19 March 04
| Charles Colson
Posted on 03/19/2004 10:11:45 AM PST by Mr. Silverback
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
To: Mr. Silverback
"Why is he headed to jail?"
Hopefully headed to jail. Probably a mental institution though. He is going because he is clearly an insane cannibal. Insane cannibals are a menace to society whither their victims want to be eaten or not. Killing and eating another human under normal circumstances is far enough outside the bounds of acceptable behavior as to be declared insane.
21
posted on
03/22/2004 8:18:55 AM PST
by
monday
To: Mr. Silverback
Blackstone, in response to the notion that a man can sell himself into slavery, said, "Every sale implies a price, a
quid pro quo, an equivalent given to the seller in lieu of what he transfers to the buyer; but what equivalent can be given for the life and liberty, both of which, in absolute slavery, are held to be in the master's disposal? His property also, the very price he seems to receive, devolves
ipso facto to his master the instant he becomes a slave. In this case the buyer gives nothing, and the seller receives nothing. Of what validity, then, can a sale be which destroys the very principles upon which all sales are founded?"
22
posted on
03/22/2004 9:14:55 AM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: monday
Killing and eating another human under normal circumstances is far enough outside the bounds of acceptable behavior as to be declared insane. You must be a fundamentalist to make such a judgemental statement based on your own self-righteous, intolerant opinion. :-)
BTW, homosexuality used to be considered a mental illness, but then it became just a matter for two consenting adults...
23
posted on
03/22/2004 12:22:19 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Your ultraconservativen click-gorilla.)
To: monday
Unless Armin has video tape showing Brandes stating his wish to be eaten and a couple of psychiatrists who had examined Brandes and found him to be of sound mind, what Armin says Brandes wanted shouldn't matter. I believe that was the exact defense used in court. There were several videotapes, several self-declarations of intent to be killed and eaten by Brandes, and the filming of the act itself.
There are people who kill themselves, and have flown to Holland and Switzerland to be assisted in killing themselves, for things such as "chronic depression" and this has been validated as legitmate reason for ending your own life.
Brandes was of clear mind when he answered the ad, was of clear mind when he made his statements on video, and was crystal clear in giving consent. This case is a choice of society deciding what two consenting adults wish to do is not acceptable.
For those who hate society (because they view it as "socialism"), this is an indication that Germany does not share their "What anyone wants to do is OK as long as consenting adults are doing it" idea of Utopia.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-24 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson