How the Mainstream Media Cover for Gay Activists

Men's News Daily ^ | 14 March 2004 | Nicholas Stix

[Travis McGee]

Just give it a few years, and the ACLU will sue to include "gay sex ed" in grade school. This WILL happen, in the name of "fairness."

"Little Johnny, how do you really know you're not gay, until you try? It only hurts for a little while. Don't you find Billy attractive? Are you going to marry a man or a lady when you grow up?"

That IS our children's future, if we don't shut down this abomination with a constitutional amendment.

[Travis McGee]

bttt

[yikes]

You're absolutely right. I saw two aged male homosexuals last year, and immediately thought to myself how lucky they were to still be alive.

[Trillian]

Were they both about 30?

[yikes]

Gays have proved the old adage that when figthing your cause ask for more than you expect to get. How many people are now willing to settle for civil unions among gays?

[yikes]

LOL! They were both in their 70s, believe it or not.

[Trillian]

Maybe they didn't choose to be gay until they were 65 ;)

[longtermmemmory]

It is really simple, the news media is dependent on advertising, advertisers want viewers and readers.

Damage advertisers and the media follows. Lexus advertises heavy on our local news programs.

[Uncle Hal]

Bernard Goldberg in his book "Arrogance" explained the reason for the PC in all of media. Each group that works for media outlets(newspapers, TV, radio) has their own group or association. Theses groups monitor what comes out of the individual newspapers or TV networks or stations. As an example there is an African American , and a Mexican American, and a gay and lesbian association of reporters that examines everything that is to be written or said. If one group or another does not like the way that particular group is portrayed in a story they will protest to management or the editor in charge. With out fail management will back down and take out anything that is offensive to the group that is protesting. This is how the world we live works as far as the elite media is concerned. This is why we have so much PC or BS, however you want to look at it.

[knarf]

"Just give it a few years, and the ACLU will sue to include "gay sex ed" in grade school. This WILL happen, in the name of "fairness."

We home school, so what the government screwels do have no immediate effect on us (except taxes), and we've taught our children to replicate their educations in their own children (yet to be conceived).

Queers, socialists and the like have no power without a following, no matter how small, and I personally believe that by witholding our children from the government, they'de have no voice.

Pull your kids out of screwel..,
Lower your living standards/expectations (you can no longer afford two cars),
Bite the bullet, teach your own kids,
Retire, if you can, knowing you really, really have provided a posterity for our nation ... and it wasn't retorical.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Examples of how the media are the minions of the "gay" agenda.

As if we didn't know this.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.

[KC_Conspirator]

The Post has a leading editorial by some American hating professor proclaiming that filthy gay marraige is good and anyone who opposes it is "intolerant" and a bigot. Thats the whole liberal argument - if you don't like this garbage being shoved down your throat by a few degenerates, then they call you names.

[Travis McGee]

You may home school your kids, but they will have to go out and live in the world created by homo sex ed, enforced gay pride weeks, etc.

[EdReform]

Bump

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

The Stamp of Normality

[knarf]

"You may home school your kids, but they will have to go out and live in the world created by homo sex ed, enforced gay pride weeks, etc."

To a point, I agree, but their education included a comprehension of what is going on and who is involved (politically) and the admonition to learn, think and act (vote) wisely.

We can only do so much and, thanks to places like FreeRepublic, we can digest for ourselves the information we receive and teach it back to our kids.

We didn't get here overnight and, I dare say, many of us came out of liberal life-styles/mindsets.

Well, I did anyway.

The day will come when the beached whales and Satanic power grabbers will be dead.

Maybe that's un-PC to say, but the truth is ... our enemies, the enemies of personal liberty and freedom will be dead.

Hopefully we can hang on to the semblance of a representative Republic long enough to give our kids a fair shot at turning back the tide.

[mrustow]

The Mainstream Media is the propaganda tool of the enemy within.

The mainstream media are the shadow government.

[mrustow]

hmmmmm ...This would lead you to think that there was a bunch of homosexuals working in and/or controling the news media and that they were allowing the sexual orientation to taint their news coverage. And we all know that could never happen in America because that would be like ... propaganda.

Impossible! It could never happen here.

[mrustow]

When will PravdABDNC report the facts about homosexuality? Homo men are 2000 times more likely to get AIDS than heteros. Their lifespans are 25 years less than normal. They are generally unhealthy and so is their lifestyle.

Oh, but haven't you heard? Heterosexuals are just as much at risk as homosexuals. There's a coming epidemic of heterosexual AIDS. Gays have been announcing (and hoping for it) it for at least 15 years ... and destroying anyone (like Michael Fumento) who dared to prove otherwise.

[mrustow]

Just give it a few years, and the ACLU will sue to include "gay sex ed" in grade school. This WILL happen, in the name of "fairness."

"Little Johnny, how do you really know you're not gay, until you try? It only hurts for a little while. Don't you find Billy attractive? Are you going to marry a man or a lady when you grow up?"

That IS our children's future, if we don't shut down this abomination with a constitutional amendment.

What I'd like someone to explain to me, is why, if our sexuality is biologically hard-wired (as gay activists insist), why are these guys obsessively involved in institutionalized proselytizing?

[mrustow]

The Post has a leading editorial by some American hating professor proclaiming that filthy gay marraige is good and anyone who opposes it is "intolerant" and a bigot. Thats the whole liberal argument - if you don't like this garbage being shoved down your throat by a few degenerates, then they call you names.

For the past four months, the New York Times has run dozens of editorials and op-eds which have repeated the same talking points. No arguments, just ad hominems. I'm starting to think that gays are physiologically incapable of rational argument.