Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medicare analyst threatened by White House
The Washington Times ^ | March 13, 2004

Posted on 03/13/2004 2:17:37 PM PST by MikeJ75

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:41:27 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2004 2:17:37 PM PST by MikeJ75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
Another Clinton appointee?
2 posted on 03/13/2004 2:21:04 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
We are headed for hitlary care like the frog in the luke warm pan of water, soon to be a boiled noodle.
3 posted on 03/13/2004 2:22:45 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
Another Clinton appointee?

What a typical BushBOT answer. They are talking about today's White House and this administrations Medicare drug benefit. Congress gets lied to almost as much as we are lied to.

Does anyone still believe that GWB is a conservative?

4 posted on 03/13/2004 2:24:04 PM PST by Mike4Freedom (Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
"He said Thomas Scully, then administrator of the HHS agency that oversees Medicare, repeatedly told him last spring and summer he would be fired if he complied with requests from Republican and Democratic lawmakers to provide cost estimates."

Are these bureaucrats members of AFSME {sp?} or some other union, or what?

In any event, I wouldn't fire this guy.

What I *would* do is borrow an idea from the motion picture "Walking Tall" as to where he'd find his office located come Monday morning, though & if ya seen the movie, you know where that'd be.

In the end given his *new* office surroundings & *new* assignments tracking the funding for new lock washers?

...it'd behove him if he just quit his job.

5 posted on 03/13/2004 2:27:30 PM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeJ75
What the HELL??!!

So we have a Republican congress that can't do it's job (STOP SOCIALISM) because Bush is threatening to fire anybody who tells them how much he's OVERSPENDING ON WELFARE PROGRAMS? (like medicare)??

Staying home election day looks better all the time
6 posted on 03/13/2004 2:31:35 PM PST by Soundman4x4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
Read the article Mikey: "Richard Foster, a Department of Health and Human Services official who has been Medicare's chief actuary for nine year..."

NINE YEARS tells me Mr. Foster got his job during the Clinton Administration.

7 posted on 03/13/2004 2:33:58 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
What a typical BushBOT answer. They are talking about today's White House

It's getting worse all the time. Nothing is blamed on Bush, the neos have been kissing his backside since he lied about CFR.

8 posted on 03/13/2004 2:35:26 PM PST by steve50 (“Let me . . . warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom; mass55th


Richard S. Foster
Chief Actuary, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Mr. Foster is recognized for his dynamic leadership and exceptional technical expertise in what has been described as "the toughest actuarial job in the country."

Mr. Foster has contributed to measurable results in programs essential to the nation's social and economic well being.

For instance, in 1995, he identified adverse financial trends that would have exhausted the Medicare Hospital Insurance trust fund by 2001.

He alerted the appropriate leaders in the Administration and Congress and played a key role in developing legislation to slow Medicare cost growth.

This effort culminated in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 with 5-year Medicare savings of $150 billion.

He continues to develop innovative and effective means of addressing long-range reforms and modernization of Medicare.
9 posted on 03/13/2004 2:36:48 PM PST by Drammach (44 Automag.. where are you??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
What a typical BushBOT answer.

And what a typical Bush-hater response to something like this. You automatically take sides and assume that someone who worked for Clinton is telling the truth? And that's better than giving this White House staff the benefit of the doubt how, exactly?

10 posted on 03/13/2004 2:39:00 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Lashing out" at Democrats since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
What a typical BushBOT answer.

What a typical Liberaltarian response.

11 posted on 03/13/2004 2:40:32 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
No link? Where did this information come from?
12 posted on 03/13/2004 2:40:41 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Soundman4x4
Staying home election day looks better all the time

You're Mobyist sugestion is duely noted and roundfiled.

13 posted on 03/13/2004 2:42:40 PM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
Everything is Bush's fault. When an accusation is made, the burden is on him to exonerate himself. Surely you must realize that by now.

Anyone who doesn't believe that is a "Bushbot", marching in "lockstep".
14 posted on 03/13/2004 2:43:25 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Lashing out" at Democrats since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Soundman4x4
For a while, a brief while, I thought I could count on the President to not be just another politician. No such luck. Even the good guys are still politicians at heart, and I've yet to see a good one. But I can't sit out the election even though Illinois is probably a lost cause.
15 posted on 03/13/2004 2:43:28 PM PST by LandOfLincolnGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LandOfLincolnGOP
What did President Bush do?
16 posted on 03/13/2004 2:44:35 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Lashing out" at Democrats since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
Let's put it this way...bub ... I do not believe a word or a whimper out of the mouth attached to a being who was appointed by clinton.... ALL his appointees were HACKS... slick-sleazy, democRAT hacks.

WHY DO YOU BELIEVE THEM???

: ^ (

17 posted on 03/13/2004 2:46:39 PM PST by Lion in Winter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike4Freedom
Do you always base your opinions on unverified charges like the one in this article?
18 posted on 03/13/2004 2:52:02 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Drammach; Mike4Freedom; mass55th
Can we conclude fromt he timelines that this guy was the genius behind the "Clinton Surpluses"?
19 posted on 03/13/2004 2:54:16 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Actually, this is a follow up article, and the story is not good. This guy estimated in June 2003 that the cost of the bill would be $551 billion. He emailed several colleagues contemporaneously that he was being pressured to shut up, and toe the $398 billion line being given out by the admin.

A group of 13 conservative republican house members told the White House that they would vote no on any bill over $400 billion. The White House assured them that the bill would be under the cap, and the bill passed by 5 votes, including those 13 hardline deficit hawks.

A few weeks after the bill passed, the White House announced that they "recalculated" the costs, and it was now going to be $538 billion, almost right in line with Foster's estimate.

This absolutely sucks. The bill would have been killed, by the White House BS'ed it's own members. Democrats weren't the ones balking on cost here, it was budget conscience republicans.

20 posted on 03/13/2004 2:58:30 PM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson