Skip to comments.
Senator: Report on Iraq Intelligence 'Damning'
Reuters ^
| 03/12/04
| Tabassum Zakaria
Posted on 03/12/2004 12:30:47 PM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Pikamax
I'm thinking the Clintons overstated the war with Iraq to Bush so Hill could pick it up in 2004.
He was well aware of how the country would react (or thought so any way) when he floated that balloon with Maddie and Cohen.
Yep. I'm pretty much sold on that - Clinton's lukewarm support for it speaks volumes.
21
posted on
03/12/2004 1:07:10 PM PST
by
mabelkitty
(A tuning, a Vote in the topic package to the starting US presidency election fight)
To: PISANO; familyofman
They were in POWER for only 7.5 months before 911 took place. That's true.
This article is about a report concerning pre-war intelligence with respect to Iraq.
Different subject.
(And you don't really think that a new administration sweeps out all the scumbags from the old administration, do you? If so, why is there civil service?)
To: Pikamax
Will we hear about this in the report?
Need Intelligence? Don't ask Kerry by Florida Comgressmen C.W. Bill Young, R-Largo, who chairs the House Appropriations Committee and Porter Goss, R-Sanibel, who chairs the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
23
posted on
03/12/2004 1:12:16 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(He says "Bring it on!!" Then when you do, he says, "How dare you!! ")
To: CasearianDaoist
The question is is why are GOP legislators aiding the Rats. They must know that this will harm Bush
A lot of people see this for what it is, typical Washington politics,I'll rub your back if you rub mine and they wonder why the public has little trust in anything that is said or done in Washington.
24
posted on
03/12/2004 1:40:13 PM PST
by
boxerblues
(Trolls...give em another brain and it would get lonesome as the one they got ain't worth a d@mn)
To: CasearianDaoist
The question is is why are GOP legislators aiding the Rats. Just as we ought not convene investigations for political reasons, we ought not avoid needed investigations for political reasons. IF our intelligence (and that of the whole world, apparently) was problematic, we need to find out what the problems are, where weaknesses are, and how to fix it.
The problem ISN'T that this is being investigated. The problem is that the media will only trumpet problems which point at Bush.
25
posted on
03/12/2004 1:47:06 PM PST
by
Dianna
To: Pikamax; dead
"Nobody is without blame." Well, I think, in all honesty, I am.
And I think dead was watching TV.
Dead?
Dan
26
posted on
03/12/2004 1:50:23 PM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I was sleeping on my couch the whole time.
27
posted on
03/12/2004 1:51:23 PM PST
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: OneTimeLurker
I think Chalabi knows that WMD is going to be found. He said something to a female reporter who smirked when Chalabi said the search for WMD wasn't over. He said (and I'm not quoting it exactly) "You shouldn't be smiling and shaking your head "no" because you are going to look very foolish when it is found.
There is going to be more on this story folks.
To: JohnGalt
Haven't finished it yet, but so far, no.
29
posted on
03/12/2004 2:35:07 PM PST
by
EEDUDE
(Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
To: PISANO
The LEAST blame should befall the GW administration due to one simple fact. They were in POWER for only 7.5 months before 911 took place.And it was the administration who finally did something about it, while the previous one did nothing serious about it.
30
posted on
03/12/2004 2:42:19 PM PST
by
Kaslin
(It is now more important then ever that we re-elect President Bush)
To: familyofman
Hold on now.......I said the LEAST amount of responsibility for the attack should rest on GW's shoulders. I did NOT hold him harmless. I simply quantified 'responsibility' for the attack as I believe it to actually be.
By the way George Bush is TAKING responsibility for 911. He has recognized the attack as an act of WAR and is replying in kind. But to PRIMARILY BLAME him for 911 because he was the POTUS at the time of the attack is not to gauge the whole truth.
31
posted on
03/12/2004 4:45:10 PM PST
by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson